BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

19 results for “house property”+ Section 12A(1)(aa)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi41Mumbai38Ahmedabad19Karnataka15Bangalore14Lucknow11Chandigarh8Chennai7Indore5Kolkata5Agra4Telangana4Amritsar3SC3Pune2Jaipur2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 80I133Section 271(1)(c)38Section 36(1)(iii)19Deduction19Penalty19Disallowance19Set Off of Losses19

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2201/AHD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2202/AHD/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 118/AHD/2009[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2489/AHD/2009[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 722/AHD/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADDL.CIT., RANGE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3254/AHD/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 441/AHD/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 442/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT.CIT.,(OSD)CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1385/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1966/AHD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3126/AHD/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2334/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2765/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1281/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 199/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2706/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2916/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2917/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1499/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

AA” contractor with Government of Gujarat for construction and development of infrastructure projects. The assessee has submitted tender documents bearing contract No.483/AMC/NRCP in respect of “Sabarmati River Action Plan” under the National River Conservation Directorate, Ministry of Environment & Forests, which was awarded to the assessee by the AMC. It can be seen from pages 28 to 33 of the said