BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 8Oclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12Bangalore9Cuttack7Hyderabad4Delhi4Ahmedabad3Chennai3Jaipur3Kolkata3Telangana2Cochin2Dehradun1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 10A6Section 14A5Section 1473Section 234B2Section 234C2Section 2712Section 10A(5)2Section 143(3)2Penalty2Disallowance

SUN PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES LTD. ( ERSTWHILE RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED),BARODA vs. THE ACIT,CENT.CIRCLE-1, BARODA

ITA 702/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Apr 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mohd Usman, CIT-D.R
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 37(1)Section 92C

disallowance of entire deduction under sections 8O-IB and 80-1C of the Act. 5.2 The AO grossly erred

2
Deduction2

NAYAB INTERNATIONAL,,VADODARA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(3),, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1068/AHD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2019AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Bhavin Marfatia, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Smiti Samant, Sr.DR
Section 10ASection 10A(5)Section 147Section 1OSection 234BSection 234CSection 271

disallowance in the given facts and circumstances can be made due to non-filing of the report in the form 56F within the time as prescribed for the deduction under section 10A of the Act. 8.4 We also find guidance from the order of Delhi Tribunal the case of Xavient Software Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. versus

M/S. UNIVERSAL MEDICAP LTD.,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BARODA

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 155/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed)

For Appellant: Shri Nimit Mehta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Lalit P. Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 14Section 14ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271

section 14 A envisage that when such expenses related to exempt income cannot be quantified incurred on administrative such as salary, bank charges, office expenditure & ancillary expenses grouped under such administrative cost shall be quantified by way of formula laid down under Rule 8D of I. T. Rules 1962. Hence, the reply of the assessee is not acceptable in view