BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

142 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80P(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai884Bangalore655Pune410Cochin339Chennai275Delhi169Panaji158Kolkata150Ahmedabad142Surat90Visakhapatnam90Nagpur85Raipur80Rajkot66Jaipur64Hyderabad61Chandigarh57Lucknow44Indore41Karnataka23Amritsar18Jodhpur16Jabalpur14Varanasi10Telangana7Kerala7SC4Ranchi4Allahabad2Agra2Patna2Dehradun2Cuttack2Calcutta2Guwahati1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(d)235Section 80P178Section 80P(2)(a)102Deduction97Section 143(3)70Disallowance64Section 143(1)56Addition to Income55Section 26345

INDUSTRIAL CO. OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,,KHEDA vs. THE PR. CIT-2,, VADODARA

In the result, the tax appeals are dismissed

ITA 1064/AHD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Jan 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1064/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Industrial Co-Operative Credit Vs. The Pr.Cit-2 Society Ltd. Vadodara. At-Kanjari, Anand-Nadiad Road Ta. : Nadiad, Dist: Kheda Pan : Aaaai 7424 B

For Appellant: Shri Aseem L. Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Mohd Usman,CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

4), and whether the ld.Pr.CIT can exercise revisionary power in view of Explanation 1(c) to section 263 of the Act. The fact is that the assessee is a cooperative credit society engaged in business of providing financial assistance to its members, and also accepting deposits from the members, and surplus funds available with it deposited with banks in FDRs

Showing 1–20 of 142 · Page 1 of 8

...
Section 25041
Section 14736
Revision u/s 26313

DHANLAXMI CREDIT CO. OP. SOCIETY LTD.,MEHSANA vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, PATAN

In the result, Ground Number 3 of the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1870/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri M. K. Patel, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V K Mangla, Sr. DR
Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

section 80P of the Act. Accordingly, the assessing officer made an addition of ₹38,56,732/- to the total income of the assessee. 4. In appeal, Ld. CIT(Appeals) confirmed the additions made by the assessing officer. Ground Number 1: Ld. CIT(Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance

SHRI VAJAPUR PATIDAR CO. OPARATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,MEHSANA vs. THE ITO, WARD-5, PATAN

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 27/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 May 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddharatha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 27/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2017-2018 Shri Vajapur Patidar Co. Operative Credit I.T.O., Society Limited, Vs. Ward-5, At. Vijapaur Po. Sanghpur, Patan. Ta. Vijapaur, Dist. Mehsana

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Agarwal, Sr.D.R
Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act with respect to the interest income from the co-operative banks. 6. The facts in brief are that the assessee in the present case is a co-operative society and engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members

THE BAVLA GROUP SEVA SAHAKAR MANDALI LTD,BAVLA, AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(5), AHMEDABAD, AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2165/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri P D Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ravindra, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of claim the deduction of Rs. 4,01,607/- under section 80P of the Act and therefore you Honors

BALASINOR ROAD TRANSPORT CO. OP. SOCIETY LTD.,,MAHISAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, LUNAWADA

In the result appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 40/AHD/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddharatha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 39-40/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: (2014-2015 & 2015-2016) Balasinor Road Transport Co-Op. Income Tax Officer, Society Ltd., Vs. Lunawada. Rajpuri Gate, Balasinor, Dist. Mahisagar-388255. Pan: Aaaab5121G

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Agarwal, Sr.D.R
Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

4. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend any ground of appeal. 3. The only issue raised by the assessee is that the learned CIT-A erred in confirming the order of the AO by sustaining the disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P

BALASINOR ROAD TRANSPORT CO. OP. SOCIETY LTD.,,MAHISAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, LUNAWADA

In the result appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 39/AHD/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddharatha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 39-40/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: (2014-2015 & 2015-2016) Balasinor Road Transport Co-Op. Income Tax Officer, Society Ltd., Vs. Lunawada. Rajpuri Gate, Balasinor, Dist. Mahisagar-388255. Pan: Aaaab5121G

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Agarwal, Sr.D.R
Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

4. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend any ground of appeal. 3. The only issue raised by the assessee is that the learned CIT-A erred in confirming the order of the AO by sustaining the disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P

THE BANAS DAIRY EMPLOYEES CREDIT & SUPPLY CONSUMERS CO.,OP. SOCIETY LTD.,,BANASKANTHA vs. THE ACIT,B.K.CIRCLE,, PALANPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 May 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddharatha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 3/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2017-2018 Banas Dairy Employees Credit & Supply A.C.I.T., Consumers Co-Op. Society Limited, Vs. B.K. Circle, Banas Dairy, Palanpur. Palanpur, Banaskantha-385001. Pan: Aaaab0631R

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divetia, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Agarwal, Sr.D.R
Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act with respect to the interest income from the Nationalized banks/co-operative banks. 4

MEHSANA TALUKA MADHYAMIK TEACHERS CREDIT & CONSUMERS SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD,MEHSANA vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, PRESENT WARD-1, MEHSANA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Ms. Madhumita Roy (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Hasmukh V. Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-D.R. &
Section 57Section 80Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act with respect to the interest income from the co- operative banks. 4

SHREE UTKARSH CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,MEHSANA vs. THE ITO, WARD-4, PATAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 315/AHD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 May 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddharatha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 315/Ahd/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2017-2018 Shree Utkarsh Co-Op Credit Society I.T.O., Limited, Vs. Ward-4, Nani Shop No.35, Patan. Gate No.2, Unjha, Mehasana-384170. Pan: Aalas9670G

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr.D.R
Section 8Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

4. The only issue raised by the assessee is that the learned CIT-A erred in confirming the order of the AO by sustaining the disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P

SOHAMNAGAR CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY VIBHAG-III,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2147/AHD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Samir Vora, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ravindra, Sr. DR
Section 194A(3)(v)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the deduction u/s 80P of Rs. 2,80,904/-. 3.1 Without prejudice to above and in the alternative, the ld. AO has failed to appreciate that real income arising from the receipts and expenses of the society was chargeable to tax.” 3. The issue for consideration before us is whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section

M/S. LAXMI BACHAT SHARAFI SAHKARI MANDALI LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 963/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Smt. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Thakkar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Alokkumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

section 80P(2) (d) of the Act. Para 4 of the Hon'ble ITAT Hyderabad in case of Metrocity Criminals (supra): "4. After considering the rival contentions, we do not see any reason to interfere with the order of Ld.CIT(A). Obviously, assessee is a cooperative society engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its Members. There

BARODA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,VADODARA, GUJARAT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for Asst

ITA 417/AHD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble

Section 14Section 14ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(iv)

4. According to the ld.counsel for the assessee expression “whole of such income” has been employed in section 80P(2)(d), and therefore, for the purpose of computing deduction admissible under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, income which is to be excluded is the gross income of interest mentioned in section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Thus

BARODA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,VADODARA, GUJARAT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for Asst

ITA 416/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble

Section 14Section 14ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(iv)

4. According to the ld.counsel for the assessee expression “whole of such income” has been employed in section 80P(2)(d), and therefore, for the purpose of computing deduction admissible under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, income which is to be excluded is the gross income of interest mentioned in section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Thus

NAVJIVAN (KALYAN) CO.OP. HOS. SCO. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 70/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.B.R.R. Kumarms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri B T Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Adjournment Application filed
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(f)Section 80P(4)

section 80P(2) (f) instead of 80P(2)(d) of the I.T. Act, without considering facts of the case. 2. The CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in confirming disallowance of deductions amounting to Rs. 2,10,583/-, interest received from Co-Op. Bank which is exempt U/s 80P

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. THE GUJARAT STATE CO. OP. HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION LTD, AHMEDABAD

The appeals of the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 923/AHD/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Aarsi Prasad, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Pritesh Shah, CA
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowing the interest income earned by the assessee by way of FD investment in other Co-op. Society, i.e. Gujarat State Co-op. Bank Ltd. (GSCB) and the rental income from HUDCO and SHARK Systems, which were claimed by the assessee u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. THE GUJARAT STATE CO. OP. HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION LTD, AHMEDABAD

The appeals of the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 925/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Aarsi Prasad, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Pritesh Shah, CA
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowing the interest income earned by the assessee by way of FD investment in other Co-op. Society, i.e. Gujarat State Co-op. Bank Ltd. (GSCB) and the rental income from HUDCO and SHARK Systems, which were claimed by the assessee u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. THE GUJARAT STATE CO. OP. HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION LTD, AHMEDABAD

The appeals of the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 924/AHD/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Aarsi Prasad, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Pritesh Shah, CA
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowing the interest income earned by the assessee by way of FD investment in other Co-op. Society, i.e. Gujarat State Co-op. Bank Ltd. (GSCB) and the rental income from HUDCO and SHARK Systems, which were claimed by the assessee u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before

RATNESHWARI CO.OP.CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,,MEHSANA vs. THE ACIT., PATAN CIRCLE,, PATAN

The appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1409/AHD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-

For Appellant: Shri SN Divatia, AR & Shri Samir Vora, ARFor Respondent: Ms. Neeju Gupta, Sr DR
Section 194A(3)(v)Section 250Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short], for Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14. 2. The Assessee has taken following grounds of appeal:- “1.1 The order passed by U/s.250 passed on 24-05-2024 by NFAC [CIT(A)], Delhi (for short "CIT(A)" upholding the disallowance of deduction u/s 80P

SHREE SARVODAYA SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,VADODARA vs. NFAC, DELHI PRESENT JURISDICTION THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1349/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr.Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Viranch Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Ketaki Desai, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowing the interest income earned by the assessee by way of FD investment in other Co-op. Society, i.e. Gujarat State Co-op. Bank Ltd. (GSCB) and the rental income from HUDCO and SHARK Systems, which were claimed by the assessee u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before

SHREE SARVODAYA SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,VADODARA vs. NFAC, DELHI PRESENT JURISDICTION THE DY. CIT, CICLE-2(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1348/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr.Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Viranch Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Ketaki Desai, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowing the interest income earned by the assessee by way of FD investment in other Co-op. Society, i.e. Gujarat State Co-op. Bank Ltd. (GSCB) and the rental income from HUDCO and SHARK Systems, which were claimed by the assessee u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before