BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

36 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80P(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai393Bangalore260Pune199Chennai137Cochin77Panaji66Delhi58Nagpur54Kolkata52Jaipur49Visakhapatnam42Chandigarh37Ahmedabad36Raipur35Lucknow34Hyderabad34Rajkot24Indore21Surat16Jodhpur12Amritsar9Varanasi6Jabalpur5SC4Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(d)100Section 80P72Deduction35Disallowance28Section 143(1)26Section 14726Section 80P(2)(a)24Section 14821Addition to Income21

BARODA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,VADODARA, GUJARAT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for Asst

ITA 417/AHD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble

Section 14Section 14ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(iv)

B (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee by Shri Manish J. Shah, and Shri Rushin Patel, ARs. : Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr.DR Revenue by सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 13/05/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 08/07/2025 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER All the three appeals are filed by the same assessee against separate

Showing 1–20 of 36 · Page 1 of 2

Section 25020
Section 26316
Exemption6

BARODA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,VADODARA, GUJARAT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for Asst

ITA 416/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble

Section 14Section 14ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(iv)

B (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee by Shri Manish J. Shah, and Shri Rushin Patel, ARs. : Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr.DR Revenue by सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 13/05/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 08/07/2025 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER All the three appeals are filed by the same assessee against separate

MEHSANA TALUKA MADHYAMIK TEACHERS CREDIT & CONSUMERS SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD,MEHSANA vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, PRESENT WARD-1, MEHSANA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Ms. Madhumita Roy (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Hasmukh V. Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-D.R. &
Section 57Section 80Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act with respect to the interest income from the co- operative banks. 4. The facts in brief are that the assessee in the present case is a co-operative society and engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members. The assessee

GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT CO.OP.MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE GANDHINAGA, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 513/AHD/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Oct 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.513/Ahd/2023 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2020-21 Gandhinagar District Co- The Asst.Cit बनाम/ Op.Milk Producers Union Ltd. Circle, Gandhinagar V/S. K. Road, Gidc Electronics Estate Sector-25, Gandhinagar Gujarat – 382 024 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aaajg 1061 B (अपीलाथ%/ Appellant) (&' यथ%/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr.Advocate & Shri Parimalsinh B. Parmar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Rignesh Das, Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 25/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03/10/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr.Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

disallowed the deduction by treating cooperative banks as distinct from cooperative societies. 5.1. The AR relied on several judicial pronouncements that support the eligibility of income from cooperative banks for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d), as listed below: a. The Khedbrahma Taluka Primary Teachers Co. Op. Society Ltd., ITA 115/Ahd/2023. b

DHANLAXMI CREDIT CO. OP. SOCIETY LTD.,MEHSANA vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, PATAN

In the result, Ground Number 3 of the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1870/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri M. K. Patel, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V K Mangla, Sr. DR
Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowed against the assessee on merits, by way of an alternate claim, the assessee is eligible for claim of basic deduction of ₹ 50,000/- under section 80P(2)(c) of the Act. 12. A reading of section 80(P)(c) of the Act states that when the society is engaged in “activities” other than those specified in clause (b

THE BAVLA GROUP SEVA SAHAKAR MANDALI LTD,BAVLA, AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(5), AHMEDABAD, AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2165/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri P D Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ravindra, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of claim of deduction for a sum of Rs. 4,01,607/- on interest income earned by the assessee on funds parked with and dividend income earned from the Ahmedabad District Cooperative Bank Ltd. under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. 4. In appeal, Ld. CIT(A) held that interest income and dividend income earned by the assessee

NAVJIVAN (KALYAN) CO.OP. HOS. SCO. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 70/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.B.R.R. Kumarms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri B T Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Adjournment Application filed
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(f)Section 80P(4)

B T Thakkar, AR Respondent by: Adjournment Application filed Date of Hearing 11.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement 02.04.2025 O R D E R PER: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT: The captioned appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi Ahmedabad, vide order dated

SOHAMNAGAR CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY VIBHAG-III,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2147/AHD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Samir Vora, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ravindra, Sr. DR
Section 194A(3)(v)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of the deduction u/s 80P of Rs. 2,80,904/-. 3.1 Without prejudice to above and in the alternative, the ld. AO has failed to appreciate that real income arising from the receipts and expenses of the society was chargeable to tax.” 3. The issue for consideration before us is whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section

MEHSANA TALUKA MADHYAMIK TEACHARS CREDIT AND CONSUMERS SAHAKARI MANDALI,MEHSANA vs. ITO, WARD-2, MEHSANA PRESENTLY WARD-1, MEHSANA, MEHSANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1923/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr.Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Mehal Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)(a)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR.BRR KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. Nos.1728 & 1923/Ahd/2025 (Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2020-21) Mehsana Taluka Madhyamik Vs. Income Tax Officer, Teachers Credit and Consumers Ward-2, Sahakari Mandali, Mehsana. 15 to 18 Krushna Complex, (Present Ward-1, Mehsana) 3rd Floor Radhanpur Cross Roads, Mehasana-384002. [PAN No.AAAJM0991 N] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant ( ""यथ

MEHSANA TALUKA MADHYAMIK TEACHARS CREDIT AND CONSUMERS SAHAKARI MANDALI,MEHSANA vs. ITO, WARD-2, MEHSANA PRESENTLY WARD-1, MEHSANA, MEHSANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1728/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr.Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Mehal Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)(a)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR.BRR KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. Nos.1728 & 1923/Ahd/2025 (Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2020-21) Mehsana Taluka Madhyamik Vs. Income Tax Officer, Teachers Credit and Consumers Ward-2, Sahakari Mandali, Mehsana. 15 to 18 Krushna Complex, (Present Ward-1, Mehsana) 3rd Floor Radhanpur Cross Roads, Mehasana-384002. [PAN No.AAAJM0991 N] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant ( ""यथ

THE ITO, WARD-5(3)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. AHMEDABAD DISTRICT CO.OP.MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 533/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.533 & 666/Ahd/2023 Assessment Years: 2017-18 & & 2014-15 respectively The Income Tax Officer, Ahmedabad District Co-op. Ward – 5(3)(1), Milk Producers Union Limited, Ahmedabad. Gomtipur, Sukhram Nagar, Vs. Ahmedabad City, Ahmedabad – 380 021. [PAN – AAAJA 0783 E] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee

ITO, WARD-5(3)(1), VEJALPUR vs. AHMEDABAD DISTRICT CO OP MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 666/AHD/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.533 & 666/Ahd/2023 Assessment Years: 2017-18 & & 2014-15 respectively The Income Tax Officer, Ahmedabad District Co-op. Ward – 5(3)(1), Milk Producers Union Limited, Ahmedabad. Gomtipur, Sukhram Nagar, Vs. Ahmedabad City, Ahmedabad – 380 021. [PAN – AAAJA 0783 E] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee

GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT CO.OP.MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE GANDHINAGA, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 512/AHD/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Mar 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate & ShriFor Respondent: Dr. DArsi Suman Ratnam, CIT D.R. & Shri
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80PSection 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance of entire deduction under Section. 80P(2) of the Act of Rs. 40,84,182/-. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating the bifurcation of deduction under Section. 80P of Rs. 40,84,182/- into Section 80P(2)(c) at Rs. 50,000/- and Section 80P(2)(d) at Rs. 40,34,182/-. The Ld. CIT(A) ought

MUSHAHID VIKAS CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,MAHESANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, PATAN, PATAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 960/AHD/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Ms. Madhumita Roy (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Mangla, Sr. D.R
Section 50Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(2)(i)

80P(2)(c) (c) in the case of a co- operative society engaged in activities other than those specified in clause (a) or clause (b) (either independently of, or in addition to, all or any of the activities so specified), so much of its profits and gains attributable to such activities as 1 does not exceed,- (i) where such

SHREE VIVEKANAND CO.OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,UNJHA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 (PREVIOUSLY WARD-4), PATAN

The appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1003/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Biren Shah, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Mamta Singh, Sr DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 1003/Ahd/2024 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Shree Vivekanand Co-op. Credit Income Tax Officer, Vs. Society Limited, Ward 1, Patan Gandhi Chowk, Opp. Town Hall, (Previously Ward 4, Station Road, Unjha-384170 Patan) Gujarat PAN : AABTS 3562 J (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Biren Shah

THE SHUKAN LOTUS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SERVICE SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 589/AHD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad06 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Parin S Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri B. P. Makwana, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 234BSection 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

B. P. Makwana, Sr. DR 16.07.2025 Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement 06.08.2025 O R D E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), ADDL/JCIT (A)-2, Pune vide order dated 13.03.2024 passed

SAVLI TALUKA SECONDARY AND HIGHER SECONDARY EMPLOYEES CO OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1772/AHD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.1772/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2019-20 Savli Taluka Secondary & The Income Tax Officer बनाम/ Higher Secondary Employees Ward-1(2)(2) V/S. Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd. Vadodara – 390 007 18, Rayakaka Park Savli Desar Road Vadodara – 391 770. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aafas 6647 D (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) ("" यथ"/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sanket Bakshi, Ar Revenue By : Shri Abhijit Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12/08/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 04/11/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Siddhartha Nautiyal, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri Sanket Bakshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Sr.DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 272(1)(d)Section 68

b) of the Act were issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer ("JAO") and not the faceless assessing officer ("FAO"). Addition of Rs.96,82,541/- u/s. 68 of the Act. 4. The learned CIT(A) and the AO erred in fact and in law in making addition of Rs.96,82,541/- u/s. 68 of the Act. 5. The learned

RETHAL DUDH UTPADAK SAHKARI MANDALI LTD,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(2)(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result appal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 209/AHD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2020-21

Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(b)Section 80P(2)(d)

b) at Rs.2,52,571/-, 80P(2)(c)(ii) at Rs.12.597/- and 80P(2)(d) at Rs.4,58,425/- and aggregating to Rs.7,23,593/-. The income tax return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Act on 25.11.2021 thereby disallowing

ITO MEHSANA WARD 5 KADI, KADI vs. THE GOZARIA PEOPLES CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED, GOZARIA

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA 1820/AHD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2020-21 Ito, Mehsana Ward-5 The Gozaria Peoples Co-Operative Kadi. Vs Credit Society Ltd. 2, Main Bazar At Gozariya Ta. Mehsana 383 825 Gujarat. Pan : Aaajt 1283 G (Applicant) (Responent) : Shri B.K. Patel, Ar Assessee By Revenue By : Shri Durga Dutt, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02/04/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 22/05/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

For Respondent: Shri Durga Dutt, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 40A(7)Section 68Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowed in iv. the return filed by the assessee. The deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was allowable as the income arose v. from credit facilities provided to members, and interest from co- operative banks qualified under section 80P(2)(d). 4. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), the Revenue is in appeal before us raising following grounds

KOTH GROUP CO.OP. URBAN CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 628/AHD/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: The Appellate Authority & Therefore, The Addl/Jcit(A) Ought To Have Deleted The Adjustment Made U/S 143(1)(A)(V) By Ao.Cpc & Allowed The Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Of Rs.5,20,000/-.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divetia &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

b) to condone the delay, that does not deprive the appellant to pursue the remedy by way of appeal before the appellate authority and therefore, the Addl/JCIT(A) ought to have deleted the adjustment made u/s 143(1)(a)(v) by AO.CPC and allowed the deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of Rs.5,20,000/-. 5. That in the facts