MAHESHKUMAR RAJKARANBHAI SHAH,DEESA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, PALANPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2014-15

disallowance of deduction claimed under Chapter VI A i.e. Section 80C of Rs.1,00,000/- and Section 80D of Rs.5

SHRI ASHISH HARIBHAI PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Ms. Madhumita Roy

sections 80C. 80D and 80G of the Act which is also reflected at page-6. of the assessment order. As per the appellant he informed the A.O. that the house hold expenses are at Rs.15.000/-per month while the A.O.. has estimated it at Rs.20.000/-. according to which it comes to Rs.2.40,000/-. Considering this, the A.O. added with

M/S. PRAVIN RATILAL SHARE AND STOCK BROKERS LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

80D. 3.0 The CIT(A) erred in upholding disallowance of Rs. 1,66,730/- as bad debts. The appellant submits that all the conditions of section

THE ITO, WARD-11(4),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SHAMSHENDER LOHIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is allowed

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Mahavir Prasad

section 80D of the Act, the net income worked out to Rs.7,31,198/-. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee has furnished confirmation from the following depositors:- S. Name of the Opening Addition Addl. Payment Closing N. Party Balance (Rs.) Interest (Rs.) Balance (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) 1. Amresh

PRAGNESH AMRUTLAL GAJJAR,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(3)(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2019-20

80D of the Act I.T.A No. 2207/Ahd/2025 Pragnesh Amrutlal Gajjar, A.Y. 2019-20 (iv) Disallowance of Loss from house property 66,264 TOTAL 4,85,607 Accordingly, the total income of appellant was assessed at Rs. 9,61,427/- as against the returned income of Rs. 4,75,820/-. The assessee filed appeal before