BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 801B(10)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai95Delhi36Rajkot34Indore20Pune14Jaipur8Ahmedabad7Chennai7Lucknow6Hyderabad5Nagpur4Surat3Amritsar3Cochin3Guwahati3Jodhpur3Dehradun2Ranchi2Jabalpur1Raipur1Chandigarh1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 80I11Section 3510Section 801B(10)10Deduction7Section 143(3)5Section 80J5Section 80A4Depreciation4Addition to Income4Section 32

SHRI UMANG H. THAKKAR,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,WARD-7(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 796/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Feb 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble (Judicial Member), Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Ahilendra Pratap Yadaw, CIT-D.R
Section 145Section 40Section 69CSection 801B(10)Section 80ASection 80I

section 80AC was not intentional or willful. 4. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the disallowance made u/s 801B(10

3
Set Off of Losses3
Section 69C2

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-11,, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI UMANG HIRALAL THAKKAR, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 760/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Feb 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble (Judicial Member), Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Ahilendra Pratap Yadaw, CIT-D.R
Section 145Section 40Section 69CSection 801B(10)Section 80ASection 80I

section 80AC was not intentional or willful. 4. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the disallowance made u/s 801B(10

JOSHI TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL INC INDIA PROJECTS,AHMEDABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE(INT.TAXN.)-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 244/AHD/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleita Nos. 80, 81 & 244/Ahd/2022 (Assessment Years 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 143(3)Section 32Section 80I

section 801A(8) and 801A(10) even though the same are not applicable. It is submitted it be so held now. 2.6 The learned AO, without requiring appellant to furnish any details in assessment proceedings, erred in observing that apportionment of expenses has been done on mechanical basis & no actual expenses are accounted on wells. It is submitted that

JOSHI TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL INC INDIA PROJECTS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT (INT. TAXA-1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 81/AHD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleita Nos. 80, 81 & 244/Ahd/2022 (Assessment Years 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 143(3)Section 32Section 80I

section 801A(8) and 801A(10) even though the same are not applicable. It is submitted it be so held now. 2.6 The learned AO, without requiring appellant to furnish any details in assessment proceedings, erred in observing that apportionment of expenses has been done on mechanical basis & no actual expenses are accounted on wells. It is submitted that

JOSHI TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL INC INDIA PROJECTS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT (INT. TAXA-1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 80/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleita Nos. 80, 81 & 244/Ahd/2022 (Assessment Years 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 143(3)Section 32Section 80I

section 801A(8) and 801A(10) even though the same are not applicable. It is submitted it be so held now. 2.6 The learned AO, without requiring appellant to furnish any details in assessment proceedings, erred in observing that apportionment of expenses has been done on mechanical basis & no actual expenses are accounted on wells. It is submitted that

ROTOFILT ENGINEERS LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1628/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: This Tribunal. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Company

Section 143(3)Section 35

disallowed by the appellant during the course of the set aside proceedings. The appellant had also submitted a list of plant and machinery duly classifying identifying it between R&D and non R&D assets, as can be seen from the Annexure-12 being submitted herewith this submission. The said annexure was already submitted before the learned AO vide

ANALYTIX BUSINESS SOLUTION (I) PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 646/AHD/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jun 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rohan Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Hargovind Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 234Section 234CSection 250Section 80J

10. The above decision of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Versus M/S Surya Merchants Ltd. (2016) 5 TMI (All HC) has also been upheld by Hon Supreme Court in PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) KANPUR VERSUS M/S SURYA MERCHANTS LTD. (2017) 3 TMI 94 (SC). 11. The wordings of section 801A or 801B or 80JJAA so far as furnishing