Search: disallowance

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 54Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai19 Delhi18 Bangalore14 Kolkata8 Jaipur7 Agra6 Pune5 Karnataka5 Indore5 Chennai5 Ahmedabad4 Rajkot4 Visakhapatnam2 Hyderabad2 Jodhpur2 Chandigarh1 Cochin1 Cuttack1 Raipur1 SC1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 2638 Section 54G8 Section 143(3)6 Section 54B4 Deduction3 Addition to Income3 Section 54F2 Section 142(1)2 Disallowance2 Exemption

REJESHRI OMPRAKASH MALVIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1) (PREVIOUSLY WARD-4(1)(3)), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1053/AHD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 10(37)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 54BSection 54G

Section 54G of the Act. The assessee was called upon to furnish various details but the assessee did not make any compliance. On 09.07.2016, the assessee’s Written Submission was taken on record and the Assessing Officer made addition of Rs.1,27,21,724/- in respect of income from capital gain thereby disallowing

REJESHRI OMPRAKASH MALVIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1) (PREVIOUSLY WARD-4(1)(3)), AHMEDABAD

REJESHRI OMPRAKASH MALVIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1) (PREVIOUSLY WARD-4(1)(3)), AHMEDABAD

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1) (1),, BARODA vs. M/S THE SPUNPIPE & CONSTRUCTION CO. (BARODA) PVT. LTD.,, BARODA

SAHEB INDUSTRIES,ANKLESHWAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1)(1), VADODARA

BHOGILAL BHAILALBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA