BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

144 results for “disallowance”+ Section 4Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi570Mumbai490Chennai181Bangalore166Ahmedabad144Jaipur115Cochin111Kolkata102Hyderabad75Pune65Indore55Chandigarh36Surat35Lucknow29Cuttack27Allahabad26Nagpur20Rajkot16Amritsar14SC12Visakhapatnam11Raipur10Guwahati7Karnataka7Varanasi7Agra6Jodhpur5Jabalpur5Kerala2Punjab & Haryana2Patna2Panaji1Dehradun1Telangana1Calcutta1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 14A75Section 143(3)64Addition to Income60Section 15459Section 80I56Disallowance56Section 2(15)54Section 1153Deduction28Exemption

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 285/AHD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

section !4A disallowance of Rs. 137,53,16,0061- under both general and ', MAT provisions. (3) The ld. CIT('A) has erred

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 336/AHD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022

Showing 1–20 of 144 · Page 1 of 8

...
25
Section 115J22
Section 12A17
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

section !4A disallowance of Rs. 137,53,16,0061- under both general and ', MAT provisions. (3) The ld. CIT('A) has erred

THE DCIT CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ADANI ENTERPRISE LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 472/AHD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

section !4A disallowance of Rs. 137,53,16,0061- under both general and ', MAT provisions. (3) The ld. CIT('A) has erred

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ADANI ENTERPRISE LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 523/AHD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

section !4A disallowance of Rs. 137,53,16,0061- under both general and ', MAT provisions. (3) The ld. CIT('A) has erred

SHRI DINESH MILLS LTD.,BARODA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE -2(1)(1), BARODA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 781/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.R. Soni, CIT-DR &
Section 10Section 11Section 115JSection 12Section 14ASection 154ASection 194HSection 40(1)(ia)

section 36 1(iii) of the Act. 34. At the outset we note that the impugned issue has already been restored back to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication as per the provision of law in its own case pertaining to the assessment year 2012- 13 in ITA No. 781/AHD/2016. Please refer the relevant paragraph bearing number

SHRI MAHUDI MADHUPURI JAIN NSM BHOJANSHALA & PRASHADI BHAVAN,,MAHUDI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2, EXEMPTION,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 184/AHD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jun 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Aarsi Prasad, CIT- DRFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12A(1)(b)Section 12A(1)(ba)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250

disallowance of exemption u/s.11 of the Act was correctly made. 6. We have carefully considered the rival submissions. The provision of Section 12A of the Act stipulates that the provision of section 11 & ITA No.184/Ahd/2024 (Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala& Prashadi Bhavan vs. ITO) A.Y.– 2020-21- 4 – section 12 of the Act will not be applicable in relation

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. AIA ENGINEERING LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, ITA Appeals 1766/Ahd/12, 2342/Ahd/15, 2343/Ahd/2015,

ITA 1766/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jan 2021AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri T.P. Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

Section 92(1) provides that, "(a)ny income arising from an international transaction shall be computed having regard to the arm's length price". In order to attract the arm's length price adjustment, therefore, a transaction has to be an 'international transaction' first. The expression 'international transaction' is a defined expression. Section 92 B defines the expression 'international transaction

AIA ENGINEERING LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, ITA Appeals 1766/Ahd/12, 2342/Ahd/15, 2343/Ahd/2015,

ITA 1757/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jan 2021AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri T.P. Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

Section 92(1) provides that, "(a)ny income arising from an international transaction shall be computed having regard to the arm's length price". In order to attract the arm's length price adjustment, therefore, a transaction has to be an 'international transaction' first. The expression 'international transaction' is a defined expression. Section 92 B defines the expression 'international transaction

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1208/AHD/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

4A of the I.T. Act. 13. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of interest expenses of Rs.2,05,49,614/- u/s.36(l)(III) of the I.T, Act, 14. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of business

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1209/AHD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

4A of the I.T. Act. 13. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of interest expenses of Rs.2,05,49,614/- u/s.36(l)(III) of the I.T, Act, 14. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of business

NIRMA CHEMICAL WORKS PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1190/AHD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

4A of the I.T. Act. 13. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of interest expenses of Rs.2,05,49,614/- u/s.36(l)(III) of the I.T, Act, 14. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of business

NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1057/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

4A of the I.T. Act. 13. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of interest expenses of Rs.2,05,49,614/- u/s.36(l)(III) of the I.T, Act, 14. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of business

NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1056/AHD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

4A of the I.T. Act. 13. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of interest expenses of Rs.2,05,49,614/- u/s.36(l)(III) of the I.T, Act, 14. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of business

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1600/AHD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

4A of the I.T. Act. 13. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of interest expenses of Rs.2,05,49,614/- u/s.36(l)(III) of the I.T, Act, 14. The Ld. Commissioner of Income tax (A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of business

THE DCIT,GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR vs. M/S. GUJARAT STATE PETRONET LTD., GANDHINAGAR

In the result appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 273/AHD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 272-273/Ahd/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2014-2015 & 2015-16 D.C.I.T, M/S. Gujarat State Petronet Ltd., Gnr Circle. Vs. Plot No.E-18, Jamnagar Gidc Electronics Estate, Sector-26, Gandhinagar.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT. D.R with Smt. Neeju Gupta, Sr.D.R
Section 14A

disallowance u/s.!4A applying Rule 8D amounting to Rs. 1,51,46,813/- . 2. Whether the Id.CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in allowing depreciation of Rs.30,90,866/- on WDV of certain Administrative Expenses capitalized in earlier years. 3. Whether the Id.CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in allowing ESOP Compensation Expenses

THE DCIT,GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR vs. M/S. GUJARAT STATE PETRONET LTD., GANDHINAGAR

In the result appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 272/AHD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 272-273/Ahd/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2014-2015 & 2015-16 D.C.I.T, M/S. Gujarat State Petronet Ltd., Gnr Circle. Vs. Plot No.E-18, Jamnagar Gidc Electronics Estate, Sector-26, Gandhinagar.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT. D.R with Smt. Neeju Gupta, Sr.D.R
Section 14A

disallowance u/s.!4A applying Rule 8D amounting to Rs. 1,51,46,813/- . 2. Whether the Id.CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in allowing depreciation of Rs.30,90,866/- on WDV of certain Administrative Expenses capitalized in earlier years. 3. Whether the Id.CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in allowing ESOP Compensation Expenses

SHRI PRAVINCHANDRA R PATEL,VADODARA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA

ITA 299/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jan 2022AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69BSection 69C

4A) of the Act refers to the books of accounts inter-alia, found during the course of search that these belongs to the assessee and the contents of such books of accounts are true. It does not deal with respect to the loose paper found during the course of search. Accordingly, there cannot be any inference against the assessee based

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA vs. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION, VADODARA

ITA 194/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jan 2022AY 2014-15
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69BSection 69C

4A) of the Act refers to the books of accounts inter-alia, found during the course of search that these belongs to the assessee and the contents of such books of accounts are true. It does not deal with respect to the loose paper found during the course of search. Accordingly, there cannot be any inference against the assessee based

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA vs. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION, VADODARA

ITA 195/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jan 2022AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69BSection 69C

4A) of the Act refers to the books of accounts inter-alia, found during the course of search that these belongs to the assessee and the contents of such books of accounts are true. It does not deal with respect to the loose paper found during the course of search. Accordingly, there cannot be any inference against the assessee based

SUN PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES LTD.,,VADODARA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, VADODARA

In the result the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1237/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Mar 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S.N.Soparkar, Shri Vartik Chokshi and Shri Parin Shah, ArsFor Respondent: Shri N.R. Soni, CIT-DR
Section 92B

4A read with rule 8D, without appreciating that: ITA Nos.922 & 1234/Ahd/2017 (By Revenue) and ITA Nos.929 & 1237/Ahd/2017 (By Assessee) DCIT vs. Sun Pharmaceuticals Inds.Ltd.vs. DCIT Asst.Years – 2010-11 & 2012-13 1 The income earned by the appellant on its investment in partnership firm was not exempt andhence was not to be considered for disallowance under section