M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADDL.CIT., RANGE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT.CIT.,(OSD)CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This bunch of appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are directed against the orders passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad on different dates. Since issues involved in these appeals are identical and in respect of the same assessee, entire bunch of appeals are heard analogously and are being disposed

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-6,, AHMEDABAD vs. VISHAL ENGINEERING & GALVANIZERS,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

4. 2008-09 The ACIT Vishal Engineering & Circle – 3(2), Galvanizers, Ahmedabad. ` Appellant by : Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.R. Respondentby: Shri Tushar Hemani, A.R. Date of Hearing 12.06.2019 25.06.2019 Date of Pronouncement O R D E R PER Ms. MADHUMITA ROY - JM: The first appeal and Cross Objection filed by the Revenue and assessee are directed against