BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 29Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi61Mumbai6Ahmedabad3Jaipur2Nagpur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 80G8Section 13A4Deduction3Addition to Income3Section 69C2Section 1472Section 1322Section 1482Section 29C2Exemption2Search & Seizure2

RHV ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1441/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Tej Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 13ASection 147Section 148Section 29CSection 69CSection 80G

29C of the Representation of People Act, 1951. More ITA Nos. 1440&1441/Ahd/2025 RHV Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO Asst.Years–2019-20 & 2020-21 - 3– specifically, SVPP had not filed the mandatory contribution report in Form 24A with the Election Commission of India for the relevant year, which is a prerequisite for claiming exemption under section 13A. Further, statements

RHV ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1440/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Sept 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Tej Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 13ASection 147Section 148Section 29CSection 69CSection 80G

29C of the Representation of People Act, 1951. More ITA Nos. 1440&1441/Ahd/2025 RHV Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO Asst.Years–2019-20 & 2020-21 - 3– specifically, SVPP had not filed the mandatory contribution report in Form 24A with the Election Commission of India for the relevant year, which is a prerequisite for claiming exemption under section 13A. Further, statements

SHAH RAKESH BHIKHABHAI (HUF),AHMEDABAD vs. THE PCIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 415/AHD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri T.R Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Vivek Chavda, ARFor Respondent: Shri A P Singh, CIT. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 80G

disallowed and added to the total income." From the above notice of the assessing officer, issued under section 142 (1) of the Act, it is vivid that assessing officer had conducted enquiry only in respect of deduction under section 80D of the Act amounting to Rs.25,000/-, We note that assessee had paid donations