Search: disallowance

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 29Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi61 Mumbai25 Bangalore14 Indore9 Pune7 Jaipur6 Chennai6 Kolkata4 Surat2 Rajkot2 SC2 Ahmedabad2 Ranchi1 Hyderabad1 Nagpur1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 80G4 Section 35D3 Section 2502 Section 1472 Section 144B2 Section 148A2 Section 270A2 Deduction2

GUJARAT GAS LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, we are of the considered view that Ld

ITA 969/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri A. P. Singh, CIT DR

Section 2Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35DSection 80

29A) of the Act requires a transformation into a new and distinct product, which was not the case here. The PCIT was of the view that the assessee had not provided sufficient details during original assessment proceedings to substantiate the claim for additional depreciation amounting to Rs. 18.89 crores and therefore, the A.O. had failed to properly examine or verify

GUJARAT GAS LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-3, AHMEDABAD

GUJARAT GAS LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-3, AHMEDABAD

SUNIL PIYUSH SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. NFAC, DELHI PRESENT JURIS. -THE ITO, WARD-5(3)(2), AHMEDABAD