Search: disallowance

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore18 Delhi17 Kolkata17 Chennai14 Hyderabad14 Jaipur11 Agra9 Pune7 Cochin5 Ahmedabad4 Visakhapatnam3 Bangalore3 Mumbai3 Chandigarh2 Raipur2 Panaji1 Jabalpur1 Lucknow1 Rajkot1 SC1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D16 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 260A4 Section 269S4 Penalty4 Addition to Income4

M/S. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. THE JT.CIT, CENTRAL RANGE, VADODARA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 108/AHD/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 260ASection 269SSection 271(1)(c)Section 271D

271D are not lawful as the appellant did not have taken at all any unsecured loans from its Directors. The CIT(A) has also not considered the legality of the case and disposed the appeal by dismissing appeal which is not reasonable. 3. As the penalties imposed were void, illegal or inoperative since inception of the proceedings

M/S. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. THE JT.CIT, CENTRAL RANGE, VADODARA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

M/S. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. THE JT.CIT, CENTRAL RANGE, VADODARA

M/S. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. THE JT.CIT, CENTRAL RANGE, VADODARA

M/S. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. THE JT.CIT, CENTRAL RANGE, VADODARA

M/S. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. THE JT.CIT, CENTRAL RANGE, VADODARA

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA vs. M/S. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION, VADODARA

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA vs. M/S. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION, VADODARA