SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

D” BENCH (Conducted Through Virtual Court) Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member Sl. Appeal ITA A.Y. Appellant Respondent No. 1 1029/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward-9(2), PAN: ATFPS6366M A’bad 2 1030/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADIT(EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

D” BENCH (Conducted Through Virtual Court) Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member Sl. Appeal ITA A.Y. Appellant Respondent No. 1 1029/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward-9(2), PAN: ATFPS6366M A’bad 2 1030/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADIT(EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

D” BENCH (Conducted Through Virtual Court) Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member Sl. Appeal ITA A.Y. Appellant Respondent No. 1 1029/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward-9(2), PAN: ATFPS6366M A’bad 2 1030/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

D” BENCH (Conducted Through Virtual Court) Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member Sl. Appeal ITA A.Y. Appellant Respondent No. 1 1029/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward-9(2), PAN: ATFPS6366M A’bad 2 1030/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

D” BENCH (Conducted Through Virtual Court) Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member Sl. Appeal ITA A.Y. Appellant Respondent No. 1 1029/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward-9(2), PAN: ATFPS6366M A’bad 2 1030/Ahd/2013 2003-04 Shri Pavan M. Sharma, A’bad The ITO, Ward

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), GUJARAT vs. PRIYA BLUE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., GUJARAT

In the result the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

disallowing [c] Unexplained rental expenses of Rs. 5,00,000/= [d] Unaccounted profit of. Rs.11,29,61,022/= [e] Suppression of sale - Gas turbine Rs. 3,41,34,100/=. 2.3. Ld TPO, while passing the order u/s 92CA(3) has accepted the underlying transactions to be at Arms Length Pricing [ALP] and therefore not made any adjustment in relation

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT vs. PRIYA BLUE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., GUJARAT

In the result the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

disallowing [c] Unexplained rental expenses of Rs. 5,00,000/= [d] Unaccounted profit of. Rs.11,29,61,022/= [e] Suppression of sale - Gas turbine Rs. 3,41,34,100/=. 2.3. Ld TPO, while passing the order u/s 92CA(3) has accepted the underlying transactions to be at Arms Length Pricing [ALP] and therefore not made any adjustment in relation

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRIYA BLUE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., GUJARAT

In the result the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

disallowing [c] Unexplained rental expenses of Rs. 5,00,000/= [d] Unaccounted profit of. Rs.11,29,61,022/= [e] Suppression of sale - Gas turbine Rs. 3,41,34,100/=. 2.3. Ld TPO, while passing the order u/s 92CA(3) has accepted the underlying transactions to be at Arms Length Pricing [ALP] and therefore not made any adjustment in relation

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PRIYA BLUE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD, GUJARAT

In the result the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

disallowing [c] Unexplained rental expenses of Rs. 5,00,000/= [d] Unaccounted profit of. Rs.11,29,61,022/= [e] Suppression of sale - Gas turbine Rs. 3,41,34,100/=. 2.3. Ld TPO, while passing the order u/s 92CA(3) has accepted the underlying transactions to be at Arms Length Pricing [ALP] and therefore not made any adjustment in relation

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT vs. PRIYA BLUE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., GUJARAT

In the result the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

disallowing [c] Unexplained rental expenses of Rs. 5,00,000/= [d] Unaccounted profit of. Rs.11,29,61,022/= [e] Suppression of sale - Gas turbine Rs. 3,41,34,100/=. 2.3. Ld TPO, while passing the order u/s 92CA(3) has accepted the underlying transactions to be at Arms Length Pricing [ALP] and therefore not made any adjustment in relation

PARULBEN VIJAYKUMAR PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

271A(8) of the Act. 11. Section 270A provides for penalty for “under-reporting of income” [penalty at fifty per cent, of tax payable on such under-reported income, under sub Section (7)] and “misreporting of income” [under sub Section (8) and (9), Parulben Vijakumar Patel vs. ITO Asst.Year –2017-18 - 5– penalty at two hundred per cent