BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 197A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi39Bangalore15Mumbai10Cochin8Kolkata8Hyderabad6Chennai6Cuttack6Jaipur4Jodhpur3Nagpur3Ahmedabad3Pune2Chandigarh1Surat1Lucknow1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 4012Section 194C6Section 197A5Deduction3Disallowance3TDS2

EAGLE STEEL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 2871/AHD/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P. K. Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri James Kurian, Sr. D.R
Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 197Section 197ASection 40

2. Write "B" if no deduction is on account of declaration under section 197A. 3. Write "C" if deduction is on higher rate on account of non-furnishing of PAN by the deductee. 4. Write "Y" if no deduction is on account of payment below threshold limit specified in the Income-tax Act, 1961. Write "T" if no deduction

GLOBAL FABRICS PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2959/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Bhadresh Gandhakwala, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 40

2 of 4 4. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) and submitted that the assessee had filed prescribed Form No.26Q with the prescribed authority as contemplated under Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1962 read with Section 194C of the Income Tax Act 1961. It was contended that in view of the fact that the prescribed information

SHRI HARIBHAI P. UTTAMCHANDANI,,BARODA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2),, BARODA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 2656/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Nov 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri S. S. Godara)

For Appellant: Shri M.J. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Prajna Paramita, Sr. D.R
Section 197ASection 40

disallowed Rs. 2,57,040/-. 6. Assessee carried the matter before the ld. CIT(A) but without any success. 7. Before us, the ld. counsel for the assessee stated that the assessee has furnished the declarations in Form No. 15G/15H from the recipient of interest and, therefore, was not liable to deduct tax at source