Search: disallowance

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 13Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi23 Mumbai12 Pune9 Cuttack8 Ahmedabad6 Indore5 Bangalore5 Dehradun5 Hyderabad5 Kolkata3 Jaipur2 Chandigarh2 Patna2 Visakhapatnam2 Amritsar1 Raipur1 Rajkot1 Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 80G10 Deduction6 Section 13A5 Addition to Income5 Section 143(3)3 Section 69A3 Exemption3 Section 69C2 Section 1472 Section 132

RHV ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1441/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Tej Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 13ASection 147Section 148Section 29CSection 69CSection 80G

13A. Further, statements of certain key persons associated with SVPP, namely Shri Kalpesh Dashrath Parekh and Shri Jigar Kothiya, showed that the party was engaged in the racket of providing accommodation entries by way of bogus donations. The modus operandi involved routing the donation amounts through shell entities under the garb of political or social expenditure, with funds eventually returning

RHV ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, GANDHINAGAR

RHV ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, GANDHINAGAR

RHV ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, GANDHINAGAR

SHRI NEERAV SHAILESH PAREKH,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11,, AHMEDABAD

MITULKUMAR AJITKUMAR DESAI,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-4(1), VADODARA

SHAH RAKESH BHIKHABHAI (HUF),AHMEDABAD vs. THE PCIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

SAURABH PRAVINBHAI PATEL AND BRIJESH PRAVINBHAI PATEL AOP,ANAND vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI