Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5,049 results for “disallowance”+ Disallowanceclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai27,434 Delhi19,712 Chennai8,309 Kolkata7,626 Bangalore6,656 Ahmedabad5,049 Pune4,721 Hyderabad3,287 Jaipur2,489 Cochin1,760 Chandigarh1,754 Surat1,501 Indore1,423 Visakhapatnam1,067 Cuttack949 Raipur875 Karnataka815 Rajkot735 Amritsar726 Nagpur723 Lucknow571 Panaji375 Agra352 Jodhpur343 Ranchi317 Guwahati295 Telangana238 Patna232 Calcutta219 Dehradun201 Jabalpur165 SC158 Allahabad149 Kerala83 Varanasi68 Punjab & Haryana47 Orissa24 Rajasthan12 Himachal Pradesh8 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN7 Gauhati2 Andhra Pradesh2 Uttarakhand2 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1 RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 J&K1 Tripura1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1 Bombay1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 14A83 Addition to Income80 Disallowance67 Section 143(3)64 Section 14835 Deduction34 Section 14731 Section 6830 Section 54F28 Section 271(1)(c)

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, BARODA

ITA 1782/AHD/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Dec 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowed, and the disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) as well. Therefore, the AO disallowed the interest

Showing 1–20 of 5,049 · Page 1 of 253

...

22

Section 143(1)18

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, VADODARA vs. AMBALAL SARABHI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,, VADODARA

ITA 2066/AHD/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Dec 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowed, and the disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) as well. Therefore, the AO disallowed the interest

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, VADODARA vs. AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,, VADODARA

ITA 1594/AHD/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Dec 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowed, and the disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) as well. Therefore, the AO disallowed the interest

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1)(1),, BARODA

ITA 1291/AHD/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Dec 2024AY 2006-07

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowed, and the disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) as well. Therefore, the AO disallowed the interest

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, BARODA

ITA 1783/AHD/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Dec 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowed, and the disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) as well. Therefore, the AO disallowed the interest

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

ITA 1773/AHD/2015[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Dec 2024AY 2003-04

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowed, and the disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) as well. Therefore, the AO disallowed the interest

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

ITA 1772/AHD/2015[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Dec 2024AY 2002-03

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowed, and the disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) as well. Therefore, the AO disallowed the interest

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, VADODARA vs. AMBALAL SARABHI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,, VADODARA

ITA 2067/AHD/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Dec 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowed, and the disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) as well. Therefore, the AO disallowed the interest

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1(1)(1),, BARODA

ITA 1290/AHD/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Dec 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं/ िनधा"रण वष"/ Sl. Appeal(S) By :

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT-DR &

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 40A(7)Section 43B

disallowed, and the disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) as well. Therefore, the AO disallowed the interest

THE ACIT,GNR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR vs. M/S. GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD., GANDHINAGAR

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2556/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Surendra Kumar, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.R

Section 115Section 14A

disallowed u/s 14A of the Act, the disallowance confirmed by CIT (A) at Rs. 25,00,000/- is highly

M/S. GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT.,GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1170/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Surendra Kumar, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.R

Section 115Section 14A

disallowed u/s 14A of the Act, the disallowance confirmed by CIT (A) at Rs. 25,00,000/- is highly

THE ACIT,GNR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR vs. M/S. GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD., GANDHINAGAR

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 419/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Surendra Kumar, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.R

Section 115Section 14A

disallowed u/s 14A of the Act, the disallowance confirmed by CIT (A) at Rs. 25,00,000/- is highly

M/S. GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD.,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE JT.CIT.,GNR RANGE,, GANDHINAGAR

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2473/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Surendra Kumar, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.R

Section 115Section 14A

disallowed u/s 14A of the Act, the disallowance confirmed by CIT (A) at Rs. 25,00,000/- is highly

M/S. GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD.,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ADDL.CIT.,GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 208/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Surendra Kumar, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.R

Section 115Section 14A

disallowed u/s 14A of the Act, the disallowance confirmed by CIT (A) at Rs. 25,00,000/- is highly

THE DCITGANDHINAGAR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR vs. M/S. GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, GANDHINAGAR

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1115/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Sept 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Surendra Kumar, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.R

Section 115Section 14A

disallowed u/s 14A of the Act, the disallowance confirmed by CIT (A) at Rs. 25,00,000/- is highly

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ANANYA FINANCE FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1186/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT-DR & Shri

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

disallowance disallowance disallowance disallowance Disallowance 20,76,038/- 11,81,635/- 4,57,189/- 25,24,619/- u/s 14A Decision

ANANYA FINANCE FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

ITA 2275/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT-DR & Shri

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

disallowance disallowance disallowance disallowance Disallowance 20,76,038/- 11,81,635/- 4,57,189/- 25,24,619/- u/s 14A Decision

ANANYA FINANCE FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

ITA 1744/AHD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT-DR & Shri

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

disallowance disallowance disallowance disallowance Disallowance 20,76,038/- 11,81,635/- 4,57,189/- 25,24,619/- u/s 14A Decision

ANANYA FINANCE FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

ITA 960/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT-DR & Shri

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

disallowance disallowance disallowance disallowance Disallowance 20,76,038/- 11,81,635/- 4,57,189/- 25,24,619/- u/s 14A Decision

ANANYA FINANCE FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

ITA 2276/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT-DR & Shri

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

disallowance disallowance disallowance disallowance Disallowance 20,76,038/- 11,81,635/- 4,57,189/- 25,24,619/- u/s 14A Decision