BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

110 results for “depreciation”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai430Delhi315Jaipur115Ahmedabad110Chennai105Bangalore87Kolkata80Hyderabad62Chandigarh51Indore39Pune39Visakhapatnam31Cochin28Guwahati28Raipur27Nagpur23Amritsar21Lucknow20Rajkot18Surat18Agra11Cuttack11Jodhpur9Allahabad7Varanasi6Patna5SC4Ranchi3Panaji3Karnataka3Jabalpur2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Telangana1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 6889Addition to Income89Section 143(3)61Disallowance56Depreciation40Section 143(2)33Section 14733Unexplained Cash Credit25Section 14423Section 148

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. STHAPATYA SHILP CONSTRUCTION, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 907/AHD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 907/Ahd/2019 With C.O.No.170/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-2011 D.C.I.T., M/S. Sthapatya Shilp Construction, Central Circle-1(2), Vs. 2, Abhiraj Complex, Ahmedabad. 68-B, Swastic Society, Ahmedabad. Pan: Abffs2922P

For Appellant: Ms Nupur Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT,D.R
Section 147Section 148Section 68

unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act in the hands of the assessee. 4.1 Based on the above, the AO analyzed the bank statements for the period beginning from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2015 of different persons whose names were appearing in such excel sheet. As per the AO, all the names of the persons appearing

Showing 1–20 of 110 · Page 1 of 6

22
Penalty22
Section 153A21

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-(1)(2), AHMEDABAD vs. SHREYASI DHARMEN SUTARIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 797/AHD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 797/Ahd/2019 With C.O.No.173/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-2011 D.C.I.T., Shreyasi Dharmen Sutaria, Central Circle-1(2), Vs. 16-B, Jadav Chamber, Ahmedabad. Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380009. 2Nd Address: 8, Amrashagun Bunglows, Nr. Hathisingh Park, Satellite, Ahmedabad-380015. Pan: Awops1881R

For Appellant: Ms Nupur Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT,D.R
Section 143Section 147Section 148

credit under section 68 of the Act in the hands of the assessee. 3.2 Based on the above, the AO analyzed the bank statements for the period beginning from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2015 of different persons whose names were appearing in such excel sheet. As per the AO, all the names of the persons appearing

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S.DHARMEN MARBLE & STONE, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 794/AHD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 794/Ahd/2019 With C.O.No.171/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-2011 D.C.I.T., M/S. Dharmen Marble & Stone, Central Circle-1(2), Vs. 16-B, Jadav Chamber, Ahmedabad. Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380009. Pan: Aabfd5172B

For Appellant: Ms Nupur Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

credited from city union bank and Prism Cement, thus the corresponding income of Rs. 1,68,970 also remain unexplained and escaped assessment. Therefore, the AO initiated the proceedings under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Act. With C.O.No.171/Ahd/2019 Asstt. Year 2010-11 5 4.3 However, the assessee before

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD vs. DHARMENBHAI MAHENDRABHAI SUTARIA -HUF, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 795/AHD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 795/Ahd/2019 With C.O.No.169/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-2011 D.C.I.T., Dharmenbhai M. Sutaria, Huf Central Circle-1(2), Vs. 16-B, Jadav Chamber, Ahmedabad. Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380009. Pan: Aafhd1653K

For Appellant: Ms Nupur Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT,D.R
Section 147Section 148Section 68

credit under section 68 of the Act in the hands of the assessee. With C.O.No.169/Ahd/2019 Asstt. Year 2010-11 4 4.1 Based on the above, the AO analyzed the bank statements for the period beginning from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2015 of different persons whose names were appearing in such excel sheet

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD vs. SHRENA S SUTARIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 796/AHD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 796/Ahd/2019 With C.O.No.172/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-2011 D.C.I.T., Shrena S. Sutaria, Central Circle-1(2), Vs. 8, Amrashagun Bunglows, Ahmedabad. Nr. Hathisingh Park, Satellite, Ahmedabad-380015. Pan: Asqps7606E

For Appellant: Ms Nupur Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT,D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act in the hands of the assessee. With C.O.No.172/Ahd/2019 Asstt. Year 2010-11 4 3.2 Based on the above, the AO analyzed the bank statements for the period beginning from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2015 of different persons whose names were appearing in such excel sheet

SHRI HAJI MOHMMADSAFI ABDULREHMAN SHAIKH,BARODA vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3 (1),, BARODA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1690/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 Apr 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Mukund Bakshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri/Ms. Sonia Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 of the act. Ground No. 3 (Disallowance of interest paid on unsecured loan) 7. During the course of assessment on verification of confirmation of unsecured loan in the cases of Dinaben Jajeda & Sweta B Jadeja, the assessing officer has noticed that assessee has paid interest @ 24%, however, the assessee has paid interest on unsecured loan

SHRI TEJAS ARVINDBHAI RAVAL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (OSD) WARD-7(1), NOW WARD-3(3)(5),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 336/AHD/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Jan 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 336/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09) Shri Tejas Arvindbhai Raval, Ito(Osd), बनाम/ 803, Anand Hari Tower, Ward – 7(1), Vs. Opp. Chanakya Tower Ahmedabad. Bodakdev, Ahmedabad – 380 015. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Afupr 7933 J .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri S.N. Divatia, A.R. अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri N. J. Vyas, Sr. D.R.

For Respondent: Shri N. J. Vyas, Sr. D.R
Section 250Section 68

unexplained cash credit, we rely on the order of Apex court in case of Kale Khan Mohammad Hanif (50 ITR 1) wherein it was held as under: “The first question that arises for discussion is question No. 4, which was in these terms: "Whether the burden of proving the source of the cash credits is on the assessee ?" It seems

FIREFLY ENERGY LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 2871/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Mar 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Tr Senthil Kumarआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 2871/Ahd/2016 धििाधरणवरध/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 Firefly Energy Limited, Income Tax Officer, 14. Pahelgaon Bunglow, Vs. Ward-2(1)(3), Judges Bungalow Road, Ahmedabad. Vastrapura, Ahmedabad. C/O. Mehta Lodha & Co. Chartered Accountants, 105, Sakar-1, Near Gandhi Gram Rly. Station, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380009. Pan: Aabca6692E

For Appellant: Shri PD Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT. DR
Section 143(2)Section 68

unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. The Ld. AR to this effect relied on the judgement of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of the PCIT v/s Aditya Birla reported in 178 taxman 418. 19. On the other hand, the Ld. DR vehemently supported the order of the authorities below. 20. We have heard

SHRI ALTAFHUSEN MAHEMUDUL HASAN SIDDIKI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,RANGE-9,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee i

ITA 577/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.577/Ahd/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.969/Ahd/2015 { "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Altafhusen M. Siddiki, Prop Dcit, Circle-9 Of Sunmoon Roadways 6/D/1, Vs Ahmedabad Pursottam Estate, Nr. Cozy Hotel, Ranipur Patia, Sarkhej Road, Narol, Ahmedabad-382405 Pan No.Arsps3765P

For Appellant: Shri Tej Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, CIT- DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 234ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 44ASection 68

unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of the Act. 4. That the CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts of the case in sustaining the addition of Rs.27,050/- being 10% of the interest on vehicle loan and depreciation

SHRI ALTAFHUSEN M. SIDDIKI,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee i

ITA 969/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.577/Ahd/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.969/Ahd/2015 { "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Altafhusen M. Siddiki, Prop Dcit, Circle-9 Of Sunmoon Roadways 6/D/1, Vs Ahmedabad Pursottam Estate, Nr. Cozy Hotel, Ranipur Patia, Sarkhej Road, Narol, Ahmedabad-382405 Pan No.Arsps3765P

For Appellant: Shri Tej Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, CIT- DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 234ASection 40Section 40A(3)Section 44ASection 68

unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of the Act. 4. That the CIT(A) erred in law and on the facts of the case in sustaining the addition of Rs.27,050/- being 10% of the interest on vehicle loan and depreciation

SHRI PRAVINCHANDRA R PATEL,VADODARA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA

ITA 299/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jan 2022AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69BSection 69C

unexplained expenses after providing adjustment of amount already recorded in the books of accounts and added separately in hands of directors. To our mind the approach adopted by the authorities below is not justifiable for the reason that it is Page : 28 Shri Pravinchandra R. Patel and Anrs Vs. DCIT, Cent.Cir.2, Vadodara ITA No.299/Ahd/2019 and Other 20 appeals settled

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA vs. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION, VADODARA

ITA 195/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jan 2022AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69BSection 69C

unexplained expenses after providing adjustment of amount already recorded in the books of accounts and added separately in hands of directors. To our mind the approach adopted by the authorities below is not justifiable for the reason that it is Page : 28 Shri Pravinchandra R. Patel and Anrs Vs. DCIT, Cent.Cir.2, Vadodara ITA No.299/Ahd/2019 and Other 20 appeals settled

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA vs. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION, VADODARA

ITA 194/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jan 2022AY 2014-15
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69BSection 69C

unexplained expenses after providing adjustment of amount already recorded in the books of accounts and added separately in hands of directors. To our mind the approach adopted by the authorities below is not justifiable for the reason that it is Page : 28 Shri Pravinchandra R. Patel and Anrs Vs. DCIT, Cent.Cir.2, Vadodara ITA No.299/Ahd/2019 and Other 20 appeals settled

M/S.KOLET RESORTS CLUB PVT.LTD.,,HYDERABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-4(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3473/AHD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad)

For Appellant: Shri Laxmikanth Rathi, ARFor Respondent: Shri L.P. Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 24Section 271

unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 of the Act. 5. Since the assessee has not used the capital assets for the business purpose during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2009-10, no depreciation

GOLD FINCH JEWELLERY LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 273/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Aseem Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: 01/08/2022
Section 131Section 133Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148

credit worthiness and genuineness cannot be established. However, on verification of acknowledgement, it is noticed that the party was having loss of Rs.3,75,915/-. It is very much clear that if the person is having loss in its business he will not proceed for investment in other companies. Also Shri Rupang R. Shah, Director of Dhanvidhya Impex

GOLD FINCH JEWELLERY LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1074/AHD/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Aug 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Aseem Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: 01/08/2022
Section 131Section 133Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148

credit worthiness and genuineness cannot be established. However, on verification of acknowledgement, it is noticed that the party was having loss of Rs.3,75,915/-. It is very much clear that if the person is having loss in its business he will not proceed for investment in other companies. Also Shri Rupang R. Shah, Director of Dhanvidhya Impex

M/S. SOUTH SHOURNE CORPORATION (INDIA),,BARODA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCEL-2(2),, BARODA

ITA 269/AHD/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Jan 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.269/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2004-2005 M/S South Shourne Corporation(India) Acit, 931, Gidc Estate, Circle-2(2), V Makarpura, Baroda. S. Baroda.

For Appellant: Shri Parimal Parmar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Apoorva Bhardwaj, Sr.DR
Section 234ASection 271Section 36Section 68

unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act. Accordingly, we set aside the order of Ld. CIT(A) and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed. 10. The second ground raised by the assessee is that Ld.CIT (A) erred in confirming the addition

M/S. SHREE SAGAR INDUSTRIES,,MEHSANA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3,, HIMATNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 1256/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1256/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2012-13) बनाम/ M/S.Shree Sagar Industries The Ito C/O. Patel Rajubhai M Ward-3, Vs. A-45, Shakuntala Society Himanatnagar Vijapur,Dist.Mehsana 384002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Abmfs1529F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri M.S. Chhajed, Ar ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Mudit Nagapal, Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing 09/07/2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement 25/09/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed: The Captioned Appeal Has Been Filed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)–7, Ahmedabad [Cit(A) In Short] Vide Appeal No.Cit(A)-7/446/14-15 Dated 20/02/2017 Arising In The Assessment Order Passed Under S.143(3) R.W.S.144 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(Hereinafter Referred To As "The Act") Dated 13/01/2015 Relevant To Assessment Year (Ay) 2012-13. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

For Appellant: Shri M.S. Chhajed, ARFor Respondent: Shri Mudit Nagapal, DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 41(1)Section 68

unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act. The 1st issue before us arises for our adjudication whether the impugned sundry creditors for the purchases and the expenses are liable to be taxed under section 41 (1) of the Act or 68 of the Act. Regarding the applicability of the provisions of section

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD vs. SHIVAM WATER TREATERS PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1447/AHD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad06 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Revenue by Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT DR with Shri Urjit Shah, A.R
Section 40ASection 68

unexplained cash credit merely on the basis of individuals who lend fund to the directors were not able to explain the sources of funds in their hand. Therefore, we are of the view that assessee had A.Y. 2009-2010 with others 19 been able to explain the sources of credit of share capital and premium in its books of account

SHIVAM WATER TREATERS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-8, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 187/AHD/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad06 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Revenue by Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT DR with Shri Urjit Shah, A.R
Section 40ASection 68

unexplained cash credit merely on the basis of individuals who lend fund to the directors were not able to explain the sources of funds in their hand. Therefore, we are of the view that assessee had A.Y. 2009-2010 with others 19 been able to explain the sources of credit of share capital and premium in its books of account