SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE LTD,VADODARA vs. THE ADD./JT. DCIT/ITO NATONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 64/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Dec 2022AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Year : 2017-18 Schneider Electric Infrastructure D.C.I.T, Limited, Vs Circle-2(1)(1), Milestone 87, Vadodara Halol Vadodara. Highway, Village Kotambi, Po Jaroad, Vadodara-391510 Pan : Aapcs 6078 Q
For Appellant: Shri Rohit Tiwari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Alok Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(13)Section 92D
section 92D read with rule 10DA of the Income Tax Rules.
6.9. The AO/TPO, thus, in the absence of data and other details of AEs, proposes to treat the assessee itself as tested party and required the assessee accordingly to benchmark the transactions to determine the ALP.
6.10 The assessee, therefore, during the assessment proceedings has submitted the fresh search