BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Section 80P(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore52Delhi40Visakhapatnam32Hyderabad21Chennai17Pune16Mumbai15Surat14Kolkata12Jaipur9Karnataka8Ahmedabad7Jodhpur6Chandigarh6Rajkot4Nagpur2SC2Allahabad2Lucknow2Indore2Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(d)15Section 143(3)5Section 115Section 80P5Deduction5Addition to Income5Depreciation4Section 573Section 143(2)3Section 12A

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SABARKANTHA CIRCLE,, HIMATNAGAR vs. THE SABARKANTHA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO.-OP. MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD.,, HIMATNAGAR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1905/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Rajpal Yadavआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1905/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Dcit, Sabarkantha Circle Vs. Sabarkantha District Co-Op. Himatnagar. Milk Producers Union Ltd. Sabar Dairy, Sub Post Boriya Himatnagar 383 006. Pan : Aaaas 5265 L

For Appellant: Shri Y.H. Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Singh, Sr.DR
Section 14ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

80P(2)(d) of the Act. Respectfully following the order of the ITAT, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble High Court in the assessment year 2009-10, we do not find any merit in this ground of appeal. It is rejected. 8 9. Ground No.2: In this ground, grievance of the Revenue is that the ld.CIT

3
Section 80I3
Exemption3

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SABARKANTHA CIRCLE,, HIMATNAGAR vs. THE SABARKANTHA DISTRICT CO.-OP. MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD.,, HIMATNAGAR

Appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2401/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Jan 2021AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Aarsi Prasad, CIT-D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80Section 80P(2)(d)Section 8O

80P(2(d) of the Act. Therefore, we feel no need to interfere with the order passed by Ld. CIT(A) and the same is hereby upheld.” During the year as submitted by the assessee in its submission before the ld. CIT(A) discussed at page no. 15 of the CIT(A)’s order that assessee was having

THE DY. CIT., ANAND CIRCLE,, ANAND vs. M/S. KAIRA DIST. CO.-OP. MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD.,, ANAND

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2218/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2218/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 D.C.I.T, M/S. Kaira District Co-Op. Milk, Anand Circle, Vs. Producers Union Ltd., Anand. Amul Dairy Road, Anand-388001. Pan: Aaaak8694F

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Shah A.R
Section 143(3)Section 15Section 32(1)Section 36Section 80P(2)(d)

80P(2)(d) held that assessee cannot borrow the money for temporary investment. He has also submitted that even Gujarat High Court in assessee's own case while dealing with issue of re-opening u/s. 148 for disallowing the deduction of interest observed that AO is conscious about the claim made by the assessee and the position of interest earned

GUJARAT FISHERIES CENTRE CO .OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABDA vs. ITO, WRAD-5(2)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 232/AHD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jun 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Jignesh Parikh, A.RFor Respondent: Shri James Kurian, CIT-D.R
Section 263Section 271Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)

B” BENCH Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice President And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member ITA No. 232 /Ahd/2018 Assessment Year 2012-13 Gujarat Fisheries Central Pr. Commissioner of Co. Operative Association Income Tax-5, Ltd. Sakar-S 2 to 4, Nehru Vs Ahmedabad Bridge Corner, Ashram (Respondent) Road, Ahmedabad PAN: AABAG5675M (Appellant) Assessee by: Shri Jignesh Parikh, A.R. Revenue

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), AHMEDABAD vs. KOTA BARAN TOLLWAY PVT. LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 2025/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Jaimin Shah, A.R
Section 80I

B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.2025/Ahd/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Deputy Commissioner of Vs. Kota Baran Tollway Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, 222, Advait Complex, Nr. Circle-2(1)(2), Sandesh Press Road, Ahmedabad Vastrapur, Ahmedabad [PAN No.AAECK2595B] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR Respondent by: Shri

SOHAMNAGAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. VIBHAG II,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(6), AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 177/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad , Which Has Arisen From The Appellate Order Dated 17-01-2023 In Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022-23/1048850676(1)

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Balani, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Trupti Patel, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234Section 250Section 37Section 56Section 57

2) and u/s. 142(1) were issued by the AO to the assessee, which were claimed by the AO to have been duly served on the assessee. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed submissions before the A.O. It was observed by the A.O. that the assessee is Co-operative Housing Society. The assessee’s main activity

M/S. ISCON MEGACITY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION ,,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMP. ), BHAVNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1290/AHD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1290/Ahd/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11)

For Appellant: Shri Tushar P.Hemani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Lalit P. Jain, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

depreciation. The other expenses of Rs.13,18,256/- were disallowed to the assessee. 14. Dissatisfied with this action of the Assessing Officer, assessee went in appeal before the Commissioner. The Ld. Commissioner further granted opportunity to the assessee, particularly, assessee has claimed 90% of the salary and bonus which has been restricted to 50% by the Assessing Officer. He reduced