BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “depreciation”+ Section 80Pclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore54Delhi43Chennai24Visakhapatnam21Hyderabad20Mumbai20Kolkata19Surat18Pune16Cochin10Jaipur10Jodhpur8Karnataka8Ahmedabad8Chandigarh5Nagpur4Rajkot3Panaji2SC2Indore2Lucknow2Patna1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(d)11Deduction8Section 327Section 32(1)(ii)6Depreciation6Addition to Income6Section 2635Limitation/Time-bar5Section 143(3)4

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AAYKAR BHAWAN VEJALPUR vs. SABARKANTHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED, MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1588/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R. N. Dsouza, CIT DR & B.P. Srivastava
Section 32Section 32(1)(ii)Section 80P(2)(d)

Section 32(1)(ii) with respect to the Assessment Year in question? 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld CIT(A) was justified in allowing depreciation and additional depreciation claimed on CANs and Equipments amounting to Rs. 1,07,64,866/- when it is clear that Milk Cans

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1)(1) AHMEDABAD, AAYKAR BHAWAN VEJALPUR, PRAHLAD NAGAR vs. SABARKANTHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK PORODUCERS UNION LIMITED, MILK PRODUCERS UNION

Section 80P4
Disallowance4
Section 573

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1589/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R. N. Dsouza, CIT DR & B.P. Srivastava
Section 32Section 32(1)(ii)Section 80P(2)(d)

Section 32(1)(ii) with respect to the Assessment Year in question? 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld CIT(A) was justified in allowing depreciation and additional depreciation claimed on CANs and Equipments amounting to Rs. 1,07,64,866/- when it is clear that Milk Cans

GUJARAT FISHERIES CENTRE CO .OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LIMITED,,AHMEDABDA vs. ITO, WRAD-5(2)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 232/AHD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jun 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Jignesh Parikh, A.RFor Respondent: Shri James Kurian, CIT-D.R
Section 263Section 271Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)

depreciable assets u/s 50 of the Act and the same was not offered for taxation. The principal CIT noted that the same was also not allowable for deduction under the provisions of section 80P

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AAYKAR BHAWAN VEJALPUR vs. SABARKANTHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED, BORIA, HIMATNAGAR

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1648/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Feb 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: \nShri Vimal Desai, A.RFor Respondent: \nShri R. N. Dsouza, CIT DR & B.P. Srivastava
Section 32Section 32(1)(ii)Section 80P(2)(d)

Section 32(1)(ii) with respect to the\n Assessment Year in question?\n3.\nWhether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld\nCIT(A) was justified in allowing depreciation and additional depreciation claimed on\nCANs and Equipments amounting to Rs.1,07,64,866/- when it is clear that Milk Cans and\nEquipment

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), AHMEDABAD vs. KOTA BARAN TOLLWAY PVT. LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 2025/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Jaimin Shah, A.R
Section 80I

depreciation. Further, it was submitted that in the case of group concern of the assessee, Chittorgarh Kota Baran Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad, similar expenditure has been allowed as revenue expenditure. The assessee further submitted that the assessee company is also eligible for claiming for deduction under Section 80IA(4) of the Act and relied on Gujarat High Court decision

GUJARAT STATE COOPERATIVE COTTON FEDERATION LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD -1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 538/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Manish J. Shah &For Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

Section 80P(2)(a)(iii) and 80P(2)(a)(iv) provided for income received from marketing of agricultural produce grown by members of co-operative society and purchase of seeds etc. for the purpose of supplying them to its members. Thus, Pr. CIT held that, the Assessing Officer has erred in allowing deduction u/s. 80P

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2 1 1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. SABARKANTHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2522/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg (Judicial Member), Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 32Section 80P(2)(d)

section 143(3)of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2015-16. I.T.A No. 2522/Ahd/2025 A.Y. 2015-16 2 DCIT Vs. Sabarkantha District Co-op. Milk Producers Union Ltd. 2. The Grounds of Appeal raised by the Revenue are as follows: 1. "Whether the Ld. CIT(A) has erred

SOHAMNAGAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. VIBHAG II,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(6), AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 177/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad , Which Has Arisen From The Appellate Order Dated 17-01-2023 In Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022-23/1048850676(1)

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Balani, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Trupti Patel, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234Section 250Section 37Section 56Section 57

depreciation and had also failed to justify apportionment of expenditure to earning of interest income, its claim was rightly rejected by authorities below - Held, yes [Paras 32 and 35][In favour of revenue]" 6.8 The facts of the appellant's case is squarely covered with the facts of the case decided by ITAT Pune Bench. Keeping in view the aforesaid