BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “depreciation”+ Section 54Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai40Delhi26Chennai13Jaipur13Bangalore7Ahmedabad6Kolkata5Pune5Indore5Hyderabad4Surat3Karnataka3Lucknow3Agra3Visakhapatnam2Chandigarh2Patna2SC2Amritsar1Calcutta1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Cochin1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 54F13Section 271(1)(c)7Section 143(3)6Addition to Income6Section 2635Section 2(14)4Long Term Capital Gains4Section 142(1)3Section 503Section 148

SIRHIND STEELS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT-4, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 713/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 713/Ahd/2019 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2014-2015 Sirhind Steel Ltd., P.C.I.T-4, 7Th Floor, Shalin Building, Vs. Ambawadi, Nr. Nehru Bridge Corner, Ahmedabad. Ashram Road, Ahmedabad.

For Appellant: Shri Vartik R. Choksi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma, CIT.D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 50

depreciation during the year and accordingly details called for are not applicable. 9.11 Thus from the above, it is transpired that the AO during the assessment proceedings have carried out necessary verification after applying his mind. Thereafter he has taken a conscious decision by accepting the income declared by the assessee in the revised return of income. Once

3
Depreciation3
Exemption3

THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(1), AHMEDBAD vs. ASHIF MEHBBOBELAHI RUSHNAIWALA, AHMEDABAD

ITA 329/AHD/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Jun 2022AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr. D.RFor Respondent: Shri S L Poddar, A.R
Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 50Section 54F

54F of the Act by investing the long term capital gains in a residential house, when, as per the AO the long term capital gain had in fact been claimed on a depreciable business asset, and was therefore in the nature of short term capital gain as per section

THE ACIT CIRCLE-3(3), AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI CHANDRAKANT G PATEL, AHMEDABAD

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 799/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Feb 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr. D.RFor Respondent: Shri Parimalsinh B. Parmar, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 2(14)Section 271(1)(c)

54F investment of sale consideration is the condition. From the facts of the case it is a clear cut case of bona fide calculation mistake. Such mistakes are rectifiable during the course of assessment proceedings. Rectifications of such mistakes are not concealment of the Act. The A.O. though has invoked explanation-1 to section

SMT. MAYA K. DHARWANI,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(2)(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 461/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Oct 2018AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divetia, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Lalit P. Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 54F

section 54F of the act , therefore, we restrict the deduction u/s. 54F of the act to the amount of Rs. 30 lacs as final agreement could not be executed because of unavoidable circumstances in the form of pending legal proceedings due to sudden demise of the first party seller of the property. Accordingly the appeal of the assessee is partly

THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI BIPIN BABUBHAI PANCHAL, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 949/AHD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 50CSection 54F

Depreciation Expenses, Petrol & Diesel expenses and Tea & Refreshment Expenses. The same was disallowed to the extent of 1/5th thereby making addition of Rs.31,424/- by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer further made addition of Rs.1,190/- towards the Telephone Expenses. Thus, the Assessing Officer passed Assessment Order dated 23.03.2015 which was subsequently set aside by the PCIT under Section

ABDULVAHED A. SHEIKH, LEGAL HEIROF LATE SMT. SARIFABEN BIKHUBHAI SHEK,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-7(2)(5),, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in above terms

ITA 2948/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri A.C. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S. S. Shukla, Sr. D.R
Section 120(3)(a)Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250(6)Section 282Section 54F

54F claim in respect of residential house purchased. 4. The assessee has also filed additional grounds before us vide communication dated 06.08.2021 as under: 01. The learned AO has passed the assessment order dated 20-12-2016 which is void ab initio on the following grounds: I.T.A No. 2948/Ahd/2017 A.Y. 2012-13 Page No 3 Abdulvahed A.Sheikh