BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

119 results for “depreciation”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai534Delhi381Chennai172Kolkata170Bangalore138Ahmedabad119Raipur108Jaipur66Hyderabad57Pune46Visakhapatnam41Surat39Cuttack37Cochin25Lucknow19Guwahati18Amritsar16Indore15Karnataka10Chandigarh10Nagpur7Allahabad5SC4Rajkot4Telangana4Rajasthan3Agra3Jodhpur3Calcutta3Kerala2Panaji2Patna2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)82Disallowance79Addition to Income71Section 14A68Section 43B65Depreciation61Deduction51Section 115J27Section 80I27Section 263

MADHYA GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD.,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 191/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.191/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Pr.Commissioner बनाम/ Sardar Patel Vidyut Bhavan Of Income V/S. Race Course Tax-1 Vadodaa – 390 007 Vadodara – 390 007 "ायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aadcm 7439 H (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) ("" यथ"/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri M.K. Patel, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43B

section 43B of the Act, is therefore upheld . Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. vs. Pr.CIT Asst. Year : 2017-18 13 24. With respect to the last issue of Capital Grants & Subsidies and Consumer Contribution written back by the assessee on account of which addition was made by the AO but was found to be short by the Ld.PCIT

Showing 1–20 of 119 · Page 1 of 6

21
Section 143(2)20
Section 36(1)(va)17

SHREE RAMA MULTI-TECH LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 722/AHD/2014[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jan 2022AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 147Section 148Section 43BSection 80I

43B for customs duty actually paid during the year. The AO has not observed anything whether this customs duty was actually paid in the previous year or not and he has disallowed this claim by only relying upon the legal issues that after introduction of Sec. 145(91) of the IT Act, the assessee is not entitled for deduction

SHREE RAMA MULTI-TECH LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT(OSD) CIRCLE-8, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1345/AHD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jan 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 147Section 148Section 43BSection 80I

43B for customs duty actually paid during the year. The AO has not observed anything whether this customs duty was actually paid in the previous year or not and he has disallowed this claim by only relying upon the legal issues that after introduction of Sec. 145(91) of the IT Act, the assessee is not entitled for deduction

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA vs. M/S. GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL POWER CO.LTD.,, BARODA

In the result, the captioned appeals are

ITA 1534/AHD/2009[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Feb 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Marfatia, Shri Nirmit Mehta &For Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)Section 801ASection 80I

43B & (v) depreciation on Managing Director’s residence. Thus, the Ld Assessing Officer determined the total income as Rs.1,83,04,23,203/- and demanded the tax of Rs.2,03,900/- which includes interest under s.234B & 234C. 6.1. First issue regarding Replacement of parts in machineries treated as capital in nature. On scrutiny of the repairs & maintenance expenses debited

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA vs. GUJARAT INDUSTRIES POWER CO.LTD.,, BARODA

In the result, the captioned appeals are

ITA 3003/AHD/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Feb 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Marfatia, Shri Nirmit Mehta &For Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT DR
Section 14ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)Section 801ASection 80I

43B & (v) depreciation on Managing Director’s residence. Thus, the Ld Assessing Officer determined the total income as Rs.1,83,04,23,203/- and demanded the tax of Rs.2,03,900/- which includes interest under s.234B & 234C. 6.1. First issue regarding Replacement of parts in machineries treated as capital in nature. On scrutiny of the repairs & maintenance expenses debited

STHAPATI ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIORS PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2361/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2361/Ahd/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Sthapati Architecture & Dcit, बनाम/ Interiors Pvt. Ltd., Circle – 8, Vs. 502, New York Plaza, Ahmedabad. Opp. Judges Bunglow, Satellite, Ahmedabad – 380015 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aahcs 8758 F .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri Sakar Sharma, C.A. अपीलाथ" ओर से / Appellant By : ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri T. Sankar, Sr. D.R.

For Respondent: Shri T. Sankar, Sr. D.R
Section 194JSection 201Section 32Section 36(1)(va)Section 37Section 40Section 43B

43B. Disallowance under section 32 3. The learned CIT (A) erred on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law in confirming the disallowance of Rs.590440/- without appreciating facts that depreciation

GUJARAT MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1880/AHD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year : 2013-14 Gujarat Mineral Development The Dy.Cit Corporation Limited Vs. Circle-2(1)(1) 6, Floor Khanij Bhavan Ahmedabad 132, Ft.Ring Road B/H. Gandhi Labour Institute, Ahmedabad Pan:Aaacg 7987 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Bandish Soparkar, Ar & Shri Parin Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Alok Kumar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 07/09/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 19/10/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per Ms.Suchitra Kamblethis Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 23/10/2019 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2, Ahmedabad [“Cit(A)” In Short] For Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Ground Of Appeal Is As Under :- “1. On Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Your Appellant, Most Respectfully Submits That The Ld.Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & On Facts By Confirming The Gujarat Mineral Development Corpn Ltd. Vs. Dcit Ay 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, AR &For Respondent: Shri Alok Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 43B

depreciation and disallowance u/s 43B in respect of payment made towards mining closure fund. The total income assessed by the Assessing Officer was Rs. 890,62,66,619/-. 4. Being aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated 10.10.2018, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 5. The Ld. AR submitted that

ATUL LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT (OSD), RANGE-1,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal are dismissed

ITA 2406/AHD/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Apr 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Us, Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Took Us Through The Chronology Of Events Leading To The Rectification Order Passed U/S. 154 Of The Act ,Which Was Carried In Appeal Before The Ld. Cit(A) Who Dismissed The Same & Against Which The Assessee Has Come Up In Appeal Before Us. Ld. Counsel For The

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. P. Srivastava, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 250(6)Section 80GSection 80ISection 92C

43B ,Depreciation is to be set off/adjusted for determining the profits as per 32 of the Act and further the unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years is to be treated as current years depreciation as per 32(2) of the Act as under: SECTION

THE DCIT, BARODA CIRCLE-1,, BARODA vs. AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,, BARODA

In the result, appeal of the assesse and the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1762/AHD/2015[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 May 2022AY 2001-02

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, CIT D.R
Section 14BSection 35DSection 37Section 40A(9)Section 43Section 43B

depreciation amounting to Rs.2,36,83,086/-. The Assessing Officer further made disallowance for provisions of Festival allowance, Miscellaneous expenses, PF/FPF not paid within due dates, PF damages, Selling expenses, Salary/Wages and other expenses of Packart Press Unit. The Assessing Officer also made disallowance under Section 40A(9) amounting to Rs.2,40,000/- as well as Voluntary Retirement Scheme which

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1,, BARODA

In the result, appeal of the assesse and the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1771/AHD/2015[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 May 2022AY 2001-02

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, CIT D.R
Section 14BSection 35DSection 37Section 40A(9)Section 43Section 43B

depreciation amounting to Rs.2,36,83,086/-. The Assessing Officer further made disallowance for provisions of Festival allowance, Miscellaneous expenses, PF/FPF not paid within due dates, PF damages, Selling expenses, Salary/Wages and other expenses of Packart Press Unit. The Assessing Officer also made disallowance under Section 40A(9) amounting to Rs.2,40,000/- as well as Voluntary Retirement Scheme which

SAFAL HOSPITALITY AND MAINTANANCE SERVICE,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 76/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Jan 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Khandhar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Saumya Pandey Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(24)Section 28Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 438

section 43B of the Income Tax Act. 1.4 In view of above, the appellant relied upon the following judgements (A) CIT v Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd (2017) 84 taxmann com 173 SLP filled by the Revenue department before Supreme Court has been rejected/dismissed in (2017) 250 Taxman 16 (SC) (B)Essae Teraoka

DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE PR. CIT-1,, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1527/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Years : 2015-16 Dakshin Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd., Pri. Commissioner Of Urja Sadan, Nana Varachha Road, Vs Income-Tax-1, Kapodara Char Rasta, Surat, Ahmedabad Guajrat-395006 Pan : Aabcd 8912 C अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri M.K. Patel, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/03/2022 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(iia)

depreciation of 20% in respect of cost of new plant or machinery acquired and installed is also extended even to the assessees who are engaged only in the business of distribution of electricity. He has contended that this amendment is made in Section 32(1)(iia) in order to rationalize the incentive for power sector and the same, therefore

KIFS SECURITIES PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result Ground No.9 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 1885/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon'Ble Justice P.P.Bhatt & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

section 43B, the same is allowable. It is therefore prayed that the additions so made may kindly be deleted. 2.The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in fact in restricting depreciation

KIFS SECURITIES PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result Ground No.9 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 786/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon'Ble Justice P.P.Bhatt & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

section 43B, the same is allowable. It is therefore prayed that the additions so made may kindly be deleted. 2.The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in fact in restricting depreciation

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3,, AHMEDABAD vs. KIFS SECURITIES LIMITED,, AHMEDABAD

In the result Ground No.9 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 2882/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon'Ble Justice P.P.Bhatt & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

section 43B, the same is allowable. It is therefore prayed that the additions so made may kindly be deleted. 2.The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in fact in restricting depreciation

KIFS SECURITIES LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT.CIT, RANGE- 3,, AHMEDABAD

In the result Ground No.9 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 643/AHD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon'Ble Justice P.P.Bhatt & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

section 43B, the same is allowable. It is therefore prayed that the additions so made may kindly be deleted. 2.The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in fact in restricting depreciation

THE DY. CIT., CIRCLE-3,, AHMEDABAD vs. KHANDWALA INTEGRATED FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result Ground No.9 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 932/AHD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon'Ble Justice P.P.Bhatt & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

section 43B, the same is allowable. It is therefore prayed that the additions so made may kindly be deleted. 2.The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in fact in restricting depreciation

KIFS SECURITIES LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT.CIT, RANGE- 3,, AHMEDABAD

In the result Ground No.9 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 2717/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon'Ble Justice P.P.Bhatt & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

section 43B, the same is allowable. It is therefore prayed that the additions so made may kindly be deleted. 2.The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in fact in restricting depreciation

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD vs. KIFS PVT.LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result Ground No.9 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 914/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon'Ble Justice P.P.Bhatt & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

section 43B, the same is allowable. It is therefore prayed that the additions so made may kindly be deleted. 2.The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in fact in restricting depreciation

KIFS SECURITIES PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result Ground No.9 of the revenue is allowed for

ITA 63/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon'Ble Justice P.P.Bhatt & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

section 43B, the same is allowable. It is therefore prayed that the additions so made may kindly be deleted. 2.The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in fact in restricting depreciation