Search: depreciation | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 153Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai93 Amritsar45 Bangalore36 Delhi35 Jaipur18 Chennai18 Karnataka14 Cuttack12 Guwahati7 Lucknow5 Visakhapatnam5 Kolkata4 Dehradun4 Hyderabad3 Ahmedabad3 Pune3 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7 Section 92C4 Section 1533 Section 403 Section 132(1)3 Section 143(2)2 Section 142(1)2 Section 2542 Addition to Income2

M/S. BODAL CHEMICALS LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals being IT(SS)A No

ITA 318/AHD/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 Jul 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Nagar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT-DR and Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr.DR

Section 115JSection 132(1)Section 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 153A(1)(b)

Limitation/Time-bar2

section 153B(1)(b) of the Act. 2. For issue-wise adjudication, we take first the appeal of the Revenue in IT(SS)A.No.27/Ahd/2021 for Asst. Year 2006-07. 3. IT(SS)A.No.27/Ahd/2021 : (Revenue’s appeal for A.Y. 2006-07 Ground No.1 : Whether the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance of depreciation

ZYDUS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.),AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 162/AHD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 162/Ahd/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2016-17)

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(13)Section 153Section 92BSection 92C

depreciation on the above (as per Para No.7) 10. Trade Mark Registration fee & Rs. 14,14,36,698 Patent Fee (as per Para No. 8) 11. Research & Development Rs. 109,74,61,000 (as per Para No. 9) 12.Disallowance u/s. 14A of the Act Rs.8,05,91,640/- Rs.234,23,50,734/- (as per Para No. 10) Assessed Business Income

CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 710/AHD/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Patel, A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14ASection 153Section 154Section 195Section 234CSection 244ASection 254Section 271(1)(c)

Depreciation on rented property 1,66,628/- I.T.A No. 710/Ahd/2019 A.Y. 2009-10 Page No. 4 Cadila Healthcare Ltd. vs. DCIT 4. Aggrieved by the disallowances, the assessee preferred appeal before ITAT and ITAT vide Order dated 03-03-2017 remitted the matter to the file of DRP for fresh adjudication, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee