BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

60 results for “depreciation”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai184Ahmedabad60Delhi44Chandigarh44Kolkata20Bangalore18Hyderabad16Chennai9Surat6Jaipur4Cuttack3Cochin3Agra2Karnataka2Kerala1Calcutta1Indore1

Key Topics

Addition to Income55Disallowance49Section 143(3)48Section 14A39Depreciation38Section 145A34Section 92C20Section 143(2)19Section 4016Section 80

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ADANI PETRONET( DAHEJ) PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, this ground of appeal is dismissed

ITA 3459/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Mahavir Prasad)

For Appellant: Shri Mudit Nagpal, Sr. DR and Smt. Aparna Agarwal, CIT/DRFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar & Parin Shah, A.R
Section 115JSection 145Section 145ASection 14ASection 5

section 145A of the I. T. Act. 2. The ld.CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance ofRs.36,64,551/- made by the AO with respect of leasehold land when there is no such provision in the Income Tax Act to allow depreciation

Showing 1–20 of 60 · Page 1 of 3

16
Deduction16
TDS15

HAGGLUNDS DRIVES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ( NOW MERGED IN BOSCH REXROTH (INDIA) LTD.),,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 931/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Oct 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & ShriFor Respondent: Shri Ankit Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 145ASection 40

depreciation on new plant and machinery, arguing that this also includes office appliances and supports their classification as plant and machinery. During the hearing before DRP, the assessee submitted that the company employs an exclusive method of accounting for Excise Duty and CENVAT, indicating that the valuation method prescribed under Section 145A

BOSCH REXROTH (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 448/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Oct 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & ShriFor Respondent: Shri Ankit Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 145ASection 40

depreciation on new plant and machinery, arguing that this also includes office appliances and supports their classification as plant and machinery. During the hearing before DRP, the assessee submitted that the company employs an exclusive method of accounting for Excise Duty and CENVAT, indicating that the valuation method prescribed under Section 145A

SHREE RAMA MULTI-TECH LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT(OSD) CIRCLE-8, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1345/AHD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jan 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 147Section 148Section 43BSection 80I

145A of the Act. However, the Ld. CIT-A vide order dated 5th January 2007 was pleased to allow the claim of the assessee by observing as under: ITA Nos.722,218&1306/Ahd/2014 & ITA No. 1345/Ahd/2015 A.Ys. 2000-01&2007-08 to 2009-10 7 “7.2 I have considered the facts and submissions of the appellant and I am inclined

SHREE RAMA MULTI-TECH LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 722/AHD/2014[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jan 2022AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 147Section 148Section 43BSection 80I

145A of the Act. However, the Ld. CIT-A vide order dated 5th January 2007 was pleased to allow the claim of the assessee by observing as under: ITA Nos.722,218&1306/Ahd/2014 & ITA No. 1345/Ahd/2015 A.Ys. 2000-01&2007-08 to 2009-10 7 “7.2 I have considered the facts and submissions of the appellant and I am inclined

ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

Appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 2035/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedasstt. Sr.No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Vartik Choksi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, C.I.T.DR
Section 143(3)Section 28Section 35Section 92C

depreciation claim on Motor Car-, Office Equipment and UPS. (7) That the ld.CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs.2,56,69,111/- made on account of disallowance u/s 145A of the Act. being unutilized CENVAT credit. ITA No.2030/Ahd/2016 and 3 others A.Y. 2011-12 19 (8) That the ld.CIT(A) erred

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. AMOL DICALITE LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 1247/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D .RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, A. R
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40

depreciation under section 32(iia) of the Act. Accordingly, we hold that there is no infirmity in the order of learned CIT-A and accordingly no interference is required. Thus the AO is directed to delete the addition made by him. Hence the ground of appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” We find no reason to depart from the established

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. AMOL DICALITE LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 1248/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D .RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, A. R
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40

depreciation under section 32(iia) of the Act. Accordingly, we hold that there is no infirmity in the order of learned CIT-A and accordingly no interference is required. Thus the AO is directed to delete the addition made by him. Hence the ground of appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” We find no reason to depart from the established

STERLING ABRASIVES LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the department in ITA Nos

ITA 334/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Nov 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 704 & 705/Ahd/2014 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/ Assessment Year : 2009-10 & 2010-11 वष" Dy. Commissioner Of Income Sterling Abrasives Ltd. Tax, Vs 45/46, Gidc, Circle-8, Odhav Road, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad – 382 415 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 334/Ahd/2015 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/ Assessment Year : 2011-12 वष" Sterling Abrasives Ltd. Dy. Commissioner Of Income 45/46, Gidc, Vs Tax, Odhav Road, Circle-8, Ahmedabad – 382 415 Ahmedabad अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" य "" यथ" "" य "" य थ" थ"/ (Respondent) थ" Assessee By : Shri K. Madhusudan, Sr.D.R. Revenue By : Shri S. N. Soparkar, A.R. सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2017 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/11/2017 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश Per Mahavir Prasad:- These Three Appeals, Two By The Revenue & One By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-Xiv, Ahmedabad Dated 04/12/2013 (Revenue) & Cit(A)-10, Ahmedabad Dated 19/12/2014 For Assessment Year 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively. 2. The Revenue Has Taken Following Grounds In Its Appeal Vide Ita No.704/Ahd/2014 For Asst. Year 2009-10:

For Appellant: Shri K. Madhusudan, Sr.D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, A.R
Section 143(1)Section 68

section 145A of the Act. 8.2 In response to the same the assesses vide its letter dated 16.12.2011 has submitted as under: "Your goodself has asked as to whether the closing balance of Excise Duty Set off RG 23A amounting to Rs.64,048/-, Excise Duty Set off RG 23C -suspense amounting to Rs.64,048/-,Sales tax receivable amounting to Rs.32

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-8,, AHMEDABAD vs. STERLING ABRASIVES LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the department in ITA Nos

ITA 704/AHD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Nov 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 704 & 705/Ahd/2014 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/ Assessment Year : 2009-10 & 2010-11 वष" Dy. Commissioner Of Income Sterling Abrasives Ltd. Tax, Vs 45/46, Gidc, Circle-8, Odhav Road, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad – 382 415 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 334/Ahd/2015 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"/ Assessment Year : 2011-12 वष" Sterling Abrasives Ltd. Dy. Commissioner Of Income 45/46, Gidc, Vs Tax, Odhav Road, Circle-8, Ahmedabad – 382 415 Ahmedabad अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" य "" यथ" "" य "" य थ" थ"/ (Respondent) थ" Assessee By : Shri K. Madhusudan, Sr.D.R. Revenue By : Shri S. N. Soparkar, A.R. सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2017 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 13/11/2017 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश Per Mahavir Prasad:- These Three Appeals, Two By The Revenue & One By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-Xiv, Ahmedabad Dated 04/12/2013 (Revenue) & Cit(A)-10, Ahmedabad Dated 19/12/2014 For Assessment Year 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively. 2. The Revenue Has Taken Following Grounds In Its Appeal Vide Ita No.704/Ahd/2014 For Asst. Year 2009-10:

For Appellant: Shri K. Madhusudan, Sr.D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, A.R
Section 143(1)Section 68

section 145A of the Act. 8.2 In response to the same the assesses vide its letter dated 16.12.2011 has submitted as under: "Your goodself has asked as to whether the closing balance of Excise Duty Set off RG 23A amounting to Rs.64,048/-, Excise Duty Set off RG 23C -suspense amounting to Rs.64,048/-,Sales tax receivable amounting to Rs.32

GUJARAT ALKALIES AND CHEMICALS LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 688/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.688/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2011-2012 Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd., D.C.I.T., Near Ipcl Complex, Circle-1(1), Vs. Baroda-390007. P.O Petrochemicals, At Ranoli, Dist. Baroda-391346. Pan: Aaacg8896M आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.937/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2011-2012 D.C.I.T, Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd., Circle-1(1), Near Ipcl Complex, Vs. Baroda-390007. P.O Petrochemicals, At Ranoli, Dist. Baroda-391346. Pan: Aaacg8896M

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 234BSection 80I

145A of the Act in the given facts & circumstances. In view of the above, we do not concur with the view of the Ld. CIT(A) and accordingly reverse the same. The AO accordingly is directed to delete the addition made by him. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed. 19. The next issue raised

BRIGHT AUTOPLAST LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. ASSTT. CIT,CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1990/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedsl.

For Appellant: Ms. Sonia Kumar Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Milin Mehta, AR
Section 234BSection 234CSection 234DSection 271(1)(c)Section 35D

section 158A of the Act to avoid the repetitive appeals. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the plea of the ld. AR for the assessee. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee is dismissed. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. ITA No.1990/Ahd/2015 & ten others Bright Autoplast Ltd. vs. ACIT Circle

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ADANI ENTERPRISE LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 523/AHD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

depreciation on office equipment directed to be deleted. 64.7 In view of the above discussion and respectfully following the order this tribunal in own case of assessee the ground of appeal raised by the Revenue is hereby dismissed. 38.1 In view of the above finding in the own case of the assessee for A.Y. 2011- 12 we do not find

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 336/AHD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

depreciation on office equipment directed to be deleted. 64.7 In view of the above discussion and respectfully following the order this tribunal in own case of assessee the ground of appeal raised by the Revenue is hereby dismissed. 38.1 In view of the above finding in the own case of the assessee for A.Y. 2011- 12 we do not find

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 285/AHD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

depreciation on office equipment directed to be deleted. 64.7 In view of the above discussion and respectfully following the order this tribunal in own case of assessee the ground of appeal raised by the Revenue is hereby dismissed. 38.1 In view of the above finding in the own case of the assessee for A.Y. 2011- 12 we do not find

THE DCIT CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ADANI ENTERPRISE LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 472/AHD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

depreciation on office equipment directed to be deleted. 64.7 In view of the above discussion and respectfully following the order this tribunal in own case of assessee the ground of appeal raised by the Revenue is hereby dismissed. 38.1 In view of the above finding in the own case of the assessee for A.Y. 2011- 12 we do not find

CRYSTAL QUINONE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 1420/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Mar 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & M/S. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1420/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12) बनाम/ Crystal Quinone Pvt. Ltd. Dcit, Cir-1(1)(2), Opp. Old Excise Chawky, Vs. Ahmedabad S.M. Road, Ahmedabad

For Appellant: Bandish Soparkar, ARFor Respondent: Santosh Karnani, Sr. DR
Section 145ASection 14ASection 194CSection 40

145A of the Act. 4.3 The Ld. CIT(A) has further erred in confirming addition of Rs. 1,81,870/- made by Assessing Officer being difference in cenvat receivable. The appellant respectfully submits that the cenvat receivable is an item of asset and difference there in cannot be added in income. 4.4 The appellant therefore submits that total disallowance

M/S. BODAL CHEMICALS LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals being IT(SS)A No

ITA 318/AHD/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 Jul 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Nagar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT-DR and Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr.DR
Section 115JSection 132(1)Section 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 153A(1)(b)

section 115JB (2) of the Act, lower of the amount of the brought forward loss or unabsorbed depreciation as per books of accounts, is required to be reduced from the profit as per profit and loss account. The working of unabsorbed business loss of Rs. 3,56,51,941 reduced from the profit by the assessee was given as under

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. PRIMA AUTOMATION (I) PVT.LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result, Cross Objection No

ITA 1717/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Nov 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasl.

For Appellant: Shri G.C. Pipara, ARFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 145A

Section 145A have been violated and accordingly made an addition of Rs. 51,59,563/-. 2. Assessee carried the matter before the ld. CIT(A) and reiterated its claim. After considering the facts and the submissions and after considering the various judicial decisions, the ld. CIT(A) held as under:- 7.2 I have carefully considered the rival submissions. I have

M/S. SINTEX-BAPL LIMITED,,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1 (1) (1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for the statistical purposes whereas the appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 1857/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Bhavin Marfatia, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D.R
Section 154

depreciation on the payment of a non-compete fee to the party. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere in the order of the learned CIT (A). The ground of appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. 14.1 As the impugned issue has already been decided by this tribunal in the own case of the assessee (Supra