BHARGAVKUMAR PARSOTTAMBHAI PATEL HUF,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed as indicated above

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Smt.Annapurna Guptaassessment Year : 2023-24 Arun Gopilal Samnani The I.T.O., Ward-5(3)(1) 7, Bank Of Baroda Society Vs Ahmedabad. Nr. P.T. College Paldi, Ahmedabad. Pan : Aywps 2887 D Assessment Year :2023-24 Bhargavkumarparsottambh The I.T.O., Ward-1(2)(1) Ai Patel-Huf Vs Ahmedabad. B/301, 3Rd Floor Shree Saran-2 Opp: Anand Niketan School Thaltej, Ahmedabad 380089. Pan : Aalhb 2685 R

depreciation, if any, under any provision of section 32, except clause (iia) of sub-section (1) of the said section, determined in such manner as may be prescribed; and (iv) without any exemption

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. KUNVARJI FINANCE PVT. LTD., AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Acit Kunvarji Finance Pvt.Ltd. Circle-2(1)(2) Vs Block B, 1St Floor Ahmedabad Siddhi Vinayak Tower Off S.G. Highway Mouje Makarba, Ahmedabad Pan: Aaack 8759 R अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Bandish Soparkar, Ar Revenue By : Smt. Malarkodi R., Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 20/06/2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 02/07/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

Exempt income 23,970 (ii)Depreciation as per IT 24,67,403 Total depreciation as per IT Act Act pertaining

ADANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

exempted income of Rs. 37.81 Crores. 10. The assessee also contended that there cannot be any disallowance of depreciation against

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. ADANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

exempted income of Rs. 37.81 Crores. 10. The assessee also contended that there cannot be any disallowance of depreciation against

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., AHMEDABAD

Accordingly, this ground raised by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2015-16 Acit, Cir.2(1)(1) M/S.Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vejalpur Vs Corporate House Ahmedabad. S.G. Highway Nr.Sola Bridge, Thaltej Ahmedabad 380 054. Pan : Aaaci 5120 L Asstt.Year : 2015-16 M/S.Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd Acit, Cir.2(1)(1) Corporate House Vs Vejalpur S.G. Highway Ahmedabad. Nr.Sola Bridge, Thaltej Ahmedabad 380 054. Pan : Aaaci 5120 L (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee By Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocae & Shri Parin Shah, Ar : Shri Ragnesh Das, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 28/04/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/05/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

depreciation with the objective of reducing its taxable income. 32. Further, it was noted that the goodwill so recorded in the books of the amalgamated company was allocated to its tax-exempt

INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

Accordingly, this ground raised by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2015-16 Acit, Cir.2(1)(1) M/S.Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vejalpur Vs Corporate House Ahmedabad. S.G. Highway Nr.Sola Bridge, Thaltej Ahmedabad 380 054. Pan : Aaaci 5120 L Asstt.Year : 2015-16 M/S.Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd Acit, Cir.2(1)(1) Corporate House Vs Vejalpur S.G. Highway Ahmedabad. Nr.Sola Bridge, Thaltej Ahmedabad 380 054. Pan : Aaaci 5120 L (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee By Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocae & Shri Parin Shah, Ar : Shri Ragnesh Das, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 28/04/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/05/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

depreciation with the objective of reducing its taxable income. 32. Further, it was noted that the goodwill so recorded in the books of the amalgamated company was allocated to its tax-exempt

KAMLESHBHAI MANUBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA

The appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Tr Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2012-13

exempt, the assessee had claimed loss by claiming depreciation at Rs.1,64,219/- which was restricted to Rs.83,230/-. However

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VADODARA vs. JAYANT SHANTILAL SANGHVI, VADODARA

In the result, appeal preferred by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1134/Ahd/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17) Deputy Commissioner Of Jayant Shantilal Sanghvi बनाम/ Pratham, Makrand Desai Income Tax Vs. Vadodara Road, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat 390007 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Anrps3651F (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Shri Ashesh R Rewar, Sr. Dr अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Milin Mehta, A.R. 22/07/2024 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 26/07/2024 O R D E R Per Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, (In Short ‘The Cit(A)’) Dated 06.11.2023 For The Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee, An Individual, E-Filed Return Of Income For A.Y. 2016-17 On 29.09.2016 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.13,82,36,020/-. In The Course Of Assessment, The Ao Found That The Assessee Had Declared Exempt Income Of Rs.4,02,26,125/- In Respect Of Profit

exempt income. 9. The other expenditure debited to P&L account were administrative expense of Rs.20,65,427/- and depreciation

EKLAVYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 315/Ahd/2020 (िनधार्रण वषर् / Assessment Year : 2016-17) बनाम/ Eklavya Education The Deputy Commissioner Of Income- Foundation Vs. Tax Core House, Off. C. G. Circle–1, Exemptions, Road, Nr. Parimal Garden, Ahmedabad Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad – 380006 (Gujarat) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaace7987R (अपीलाथीर् /Appellant) (प्र"यथीर् / Respondent) .. अपीलाथीर् ओर से /Appellant By : Shri M. K. Patel, A.R. प्र"यथीर् की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Sr. D.R. सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of 14/10/2022 Hearing घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of 31/10/2022 Pronouncement

exemption under Section 11D of the Act. In fact, total depreciation debited during the year was Rs.85,10,912/- which

MAKSON PHARMA CEUTICALS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,SURENDRANAGAR vs. PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2020-21

depreciation on plant & machinery of Rs.5,87,427/- (iii) disallowance u/s, 14A r.w.s. 8D for exempt income earned by the appellant

SHIVASHISH FOUNDATION TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT.CIT(OSD), CIRCLE-1 (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

depreciation of Rs.25,48,340/- claimed u/s 11, but upheld the disallowance of exemption u/s 11(1)(a) and 11(2) aggregating

SOCIETY FOR DENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION & RESEARCH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, AHMEDABAD

Appeal of the Assessee is allowed

depreciation. 3. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO has allowed irregular exemption. As per audit report, it is noticed

ANANYA FINANCE FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Mahavir Prasadassessment Year : 2011-12 Ananya Finance For Inclusive The Dcit, Cir.1(1)(1) Growth P Ltd. Ambawadi 401, Shaan, Op: M.J. Library Ahmedabad 380015. Ashram Road Ahmedabad 380 009. Pan : Aahca 8023 D

depreciation of Rs.7.58 cr. on intangible assets are not admitted by the appellant to the extent the same are contrary to the facts on record. 4.1 The Ld.CIT(A) has erred in upholding that the provisions of section 14A were attracted on account of exempt

THE JT. CIT(EXEMPTION)(OSD), CIRCLE-2, AHMEDABAD vs. DIVYA JYOTI TRUST, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Waseem Ahmed & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2015-16 Jt.Cit (Exemptions)(Osd) Divya Jyoti Trust Cir.2, Ahmedabad. Vs Tejas Eye Hospital Suthar Faliyaat & Post – Mandvi Surat 394 610. Pan : Aabtd 3401 D अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ketan Jagirdar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Urjit Shah, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 17/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 25/02/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against Order Dated 7.6.2019 In Appeal No. Cit(A)-9/10321/Dcit(E), Cir.2-/17-18Passed By The Ld.Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-9, Ahmedabad [For Short “Ld.Cit(A)] Relating To The Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

exempt income as applied for the charitable purposes and also considered the controversial issue of allowing the depreciation. The amendment

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, VEJALPUR, AHMEDABAD vs. AIA ENGINEERING LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed, whereas the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarआयकर अपील सं / Ita No. 397/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 बनाम Aia Engineering Limited, Dcit Vs. 115, Gvmm Estate, Odhav Road, Circle-1(1)(1), Odhav, Ahmedabad-382415 Ahmedabad Pan : Aabca 2777 J आयकर अपील सं / Ita No. 532/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 बनाम Aia Engineering Limited, Acit, Vs. 115, Gvmm Estate, Odhav Road, Circle-1(1)(1), Odhav, Ahmedabad-382415 Ahmedabad Pan : Aabca 2777 J अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" "" यथ" "" "" यथ" यथ"/ (Respondent) यथ" िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate & Shri Parimalsinh B. Parmar, Ar ""थ" की ओर से / Revenue By : Shri Pratik Sharma, Sr Dr & Shri Sudhendu Das, Cit-Dr तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2024 सुनवाई क" क" तारीख सुनवाई सुनवाई सुनवाई क" क" तारीख तारीख घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21.10.2024 घोषणा घोषणा घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

depreciation allowance in amalgamation or demerger, etc under the provisions of section 72A of the Act. iv. Exemption of capital

SPORTS AUTHORITY OF GUJARAT,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DCIT (EXEMPRTION) (HQ), AHMEDABAD

In the result, Ground Number 3 of the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

depreciation allowance, whether the same is claimed by the assessee or not, provided, the I.T.A No. 943/Ahd/2019 A.Y. 2010-11 Page No. 4 Sports Authority of Gujarat vs. DCIT (Exemption

THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(1), AHMEDBAD vs. ASHIF MEHBBOBELAHI RUSHNAIWALA, AHMEDABAD

exemption of the same u/s. 54F of the Act by investing the long term capital gains in a residential house, when, as per the AO the long term capital gain had in fact been claimed on a depreciable

ANANYA FINANCE FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

depreciation of Rs.5,68,50,000/- on intangible assets are not admitted by the appellant to the extent the same are contrary to the facts on record. 4.1 The Ld.CIT(A) has erred in upholding that the provisions of section 14A were attracted on account of exempt