BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai28Jaipur21Surat18Chennai17Delhi16Chandigarh14Rajkot12Kolkata11Bangalore11Hyderabad11Pune8Ahmedabad7Dehradun6Visakhapatnam3Guwahati3Indore2SC2Cochin2Amritsar2Lucknow1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)10Addition to Income7Section 271A6Section 234A6Unexplained Investment6Penalty6Cash Deposit6Section 270A5Section 10

GUJARAT MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY AHMEDABAD,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1, EXEMP, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 2612/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 234ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 69

delay should have been condoned and learned CIT(A) should have adjudicated appeal on merits and should not have dismissed the same in limine. 2. (a) The learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in upholding the learned Assessing Officer's order in confirming additions of Rs.47,81,89,398/- comprising of following items in the assessment order

5
Section 695
Exemption5
Section 69B3

GUJARAT MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY AHMEDABAD,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1, EXEMP, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 2613/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 234ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 69

delay should have been condoned and learned CIT(A) should have adjudicated appeal on merits and should not have dismissed the same in limine. 2. (a) The learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in upholding the learned Assessing Officer's order in confirming additions of Rs.47,81,89,398/- comprising of following items in the assessment order

GUJARAT MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY AHMEDABAD,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1, EXEMP, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 2614/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 234ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 69

delay should have been condoned and learned CIT(A) should have adjudicated appeal on merits and should not have dismissed the same in limine. 2. (a) The learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in upholding the learned Assessing Officer's order in confirming additions of Rs.47,81,89,398/- comprising of following items in the assessment order

GUJARAT MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY AHMEDABAD,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1, EXEMP, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 2616/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 234ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 69

delay should have been condoned and learned CIT(A) should have adjudicated appeal on merits and should not have dismissed the same in limine. 2. (a) The learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in upholding the learned Assessing Officer's order in confirming additions of Rs.47,81,89,398/- comprising of following items in the assessment order

GUJARAT MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY AHMEDABAD,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1, EXEMP, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 2615/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 234ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 69

delay should have been condoned and learned CIT(A) should have adjudicated appeal on merits and should not have dismissed the same in limine. 2. (a) The learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in upholding the learned Assessing Officer's order in confirming additions of Rs.47,81,89,398/- comprising of following items in the assessment order

ANJU BHARAT CHELANI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-6(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2598/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Respondent by: Ms. Ketaki Desai, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Ms. Ketaki Desai, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 149(1)Section 271ASection 69ASection 69B

69B read with section 115BBE of the Act. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 143(3) read with sections 147 and 144B of the Act assessing the total income at Rs. 3,21,150/- and the Assessing Officer also initiated penalty proceedings under section 271AAC(1) of the Act. 5. Aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee

MAJIDKHAN YAKUBKHAN PATHAN,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1)(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 625/AHD/2024[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad10 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumarasstt.Year : 2012-13 Majidkhan Yakubkhab Pathan Ito, Ward-3(1)(2) Basement Sardar Complex Vs Vadodara. Nr. Bank Of India Raopura, Vadodara Vadodara 390 001. Pan : Axlpp 0545 M (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee By Shri P.F. Jain, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ravindra, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10/10/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 10/10/2024 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश

For Respondent: Shri Ravindra, SR.DR
Section 144Section 234ASection 250Section 68Section 69BSection 69C

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short). 2. In the appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds: (1): The learned CIT(A) has grievously erred in law and on facts in dismissing the Appeal of the assessee Filed On 01.01.2020 against order of A.O. passed u/s 144 r.w.s.147 making addition of Rs.31