Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 53Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur38 Bangalore23 Chennai18 Mumbai16 Patna7 Kolkata7 Delhi5 Hyderabad5 Pune4 Visakhapatnam3 Chandigarh3 Amritsar2 Indore2 SC2 Ahmedabad2 Telangana1 Calcutta1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 1484 Section 50C(5)3 Section 50C2 Penalty2

SARLABEN R. ARORA,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2072/AHD/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Feb 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royअपील सं./Ita No.2072/Ahd/2015 & "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2007-2008

For Appellant: Shri Biren Shah, A.R

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay. 5. Now we proceed to deal with the merit of the matter. The appellant is an individual declaring income from long term capital gain and other sources of income by filing return of income on 26.12.2007 declaring total income at Rs.3,42,781/- in the Assessment Year 2007-08. Upon scrutiny the matter was re-opened

SARLABEN R. ARORA,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(3),, AHMEDABAD

LALJIBHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI GAUDANI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHEMDABAD

SARLABEN R. ARORA,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(3),, AHMEDABAD

LALJIBHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI GAUDANI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHEMDABAD