Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka21 Delhi11 Bangalore5 Visakhapatnam3 Ahmedabad2 Kolkata2 Chennai1 Mumbai1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 1472 Section 1482 Section 142(1)2 Section 80P(1)(b)2 Section 46A2 Section 80P2 Deduction2 TDS2 Addition to Income

THE THAVAR DUDH UTPADAK SAHKARI MANDLI LIMITED,BANASKANTHA vs. THE ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE- GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1555/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. BRR KUMAR (Vice President), Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 46ASection 80PSection 80P(1)(b)

condoned the delay in filing the appeal, however not entertained application u/s. 46A of the Rules, since the assessee failed to file the same before the Assessing Officer, thereby rejected the claim of the assessee and upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer by observing as follows: “…..vi. From the submissions of the appellant assessee this Appellate authority

THE THAVAR DUDH UTPADAK SAHKARI MANDLI LIMITED,BANASKANTHA vs. THE ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE- GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR

THE THAVAR DUDH UTPADAK SAHKARI MANDLI LIMITED,BANASKANTHA vs. THE ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE- GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR

THE THAVAR DUDH UTPADAK SAHAKARI MANDLI LIMITED,BANASKANTHA vs. THE ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE-GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR