Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272A(2)(k)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai26 Pune18 Cuttack16 Cochin11 Panaji10 Lucknow8 Bangalore6 Chandigarh5 Jaipur5 Rajkot5 Ahmedabad3 Delhi3 Hyderabad3 Visakhapatnam3 Surat2 Kolkata1 Jodhpur1 Mumbai1

Key Topics

Section 272A(1)(d)5 Section 1444 Section 142(1)3 Penalty3 Addition to Income3 Section 69A2 Limitation/Time-bar2 Condonation of Delay2

CHINTAN BHARATBHAI SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, impugned order is set-aside and appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 678/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 678/Ahd/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18)

For Respondent: Shri V. K. Mangla, Sr. DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 272A(1)(d)Section 69

delay is condoned. 3. The appellant has challenged the penalty levied under Section 272A(1)(d) of the Act to the tune of Rs.30,000/-. 4. The facts of the case is this that during the course of assessment proceeding notices under Section 142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire were issued to the appellant but without any result

CHINTAN BHARATBHAI SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

CHINTAN BHARATBHAI SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

GOMTIDAS GOVINDRAM SADHU,RAMJI MANDIR SHERTHA, GANDHINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 GANDHINAGAR, UDYOG BHAWAN, GANDHINAGAR

TIMBA MUVADI DUDH MANDALI,MAHIASAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, LUNAWADA