BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

25 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi158Chennai86Pune69Mumbai45Bangalore44Visakhapatnam37Lucknow25Ahmedabad25Surat25Karnataka21Indore18Cuttack16Kolkata15Hyderabad13Cochin12Rajkot9Jaipur8Amritsar7Chandigarh6Patna4Nagpur4Jabalpur3Agra3Raipur3SC2Allahabad1Guwahati1Ranchi1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 272A(1)(d)30Penalty24Addition to Income22Section 271A20Section 14719Section 270A18Section 144B16Section 14414Section 69A

DCIT CIRCLE GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR vs. SHRI UMIYA CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD LINCH, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 1933/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271ESection 273BSection 3Section 56

272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA or section 2728 or sub- section (1) or sub-section (1A) of section 272BB or sub-section sub-section (1) of section 2 section 2728BB or clause (b) of sub-section (1) or clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 273, no penalty shall be Imposable on the person

Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

14
Natural Justice14
Section 6912
Unexplained Investment10

DCIT, CIRCLE GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR vs. SHRI UMIYA CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD LINCH, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 1932/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271ESection 273BSection 3Section 56

272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA or section 2728 or sub- section (1) or sub-section (1A) of section 272BB or sub-section sub-section (1) of section 2 section 2728BB or clause (b) of sub-section (1) or clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 273, no penalty shall be Imposable on the person

AIR WIND GREEN ENERGY LIMITED,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1, BHAVNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2435/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Varis Isani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri C Dharani Nath, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 272ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 273BSection 274

E-Appeals) (for short "Appellate Authority") has erred in dismissing the appeal of the appellant on the grounds of the limitation by not condoning of delay, and confirming the penalty levied u/s. 272A(1)(d) Income Tax Act. 2. The Lrd. Appellate Authority failed to appreciate that the appellant had a reasonable and sufficient caused for not filing the appeal

SOLEONE TRADELINKS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, CIRCLE 4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 603/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Malarkodi R., Sr. DR
Section 144

condonation, of delay is contrary to the principles of natural justice and deserves to be set aside. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not adjudicating the appellant's grounds on merits and mechanically dismissing the appeal on technical grounds. It is prayed that the matter be restored for fresh adjudication on merits. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) failed

CHINTAN BHARATBHAI SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, impugned order is set-aside and appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 678/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 678/Ahd/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18)

For Respondent: Shri V. K. Mangla, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 272A(1)(d)Section 69

delay is condoned. 3. The appellant has challenged the penalty levied under Section 272A(1)(d) of the Act to the tune of Rs.30,000/-. 4. The facts of the case is this that during the course of assessment proceeding notices under Section 142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire were issued to the appellant but without any result

GOMTIDAS GOVINDRAM SADHU,RAMJI MANDIR SHERTHA, GANDHINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2 GANDHINAGAR, UDYOG BHAWAN, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes with a direction as above

ITA 344/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad09 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No. 344/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Palak Pavagadhi, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Mamta Singh, Sr.DR
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 144ASection 250Section 69A

E R PER MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 19.12.2023 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”] for the Assessment Year

MAHEMUDKHAN AJAMUDDIN RANA,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), VADODARA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1198/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Suthar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Hargovind Singh, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 144Section 147Section 2(14)Section 69A

E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (in short “NFAC”), Delhi vide order dated 21.08.2024 passed for A.Y. 2018-19. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal

DINESH RAMANBHAI PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1506/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.1506/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Dinesh Ramanbhai Patel The Ito बनाम/ 23, Shyam Sharan Part-2 Ward-3(2)(1) V/S. Aarohi Club Road Ahmedabad Bopal-Ghuma Ahmedabad – 380 058 (Gujarat) "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Btbpp 3659 P अपीलाथ%/ (Appellant) &' यथ%/ (Respondent) ….. Assessee By : Shri Shri Kushal Fofaria, Ar Revenue By : Shri V.K. Mangla, Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 17/10/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 25/10/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Shri Kushal Fofaria, ARFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Mangla, Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 250(6)Section 272ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 272A(3)(aa)Section 69

2. A notice under Section 148 was issued on 26.03.2021 for A.Y. 2017-18, but it was sent to an email address created by the consultant, and not directly to the assessee. The consultant informed the assessee about the notice, and the assessee entrusted him with the task of handling the assessment. 3. The assessee inquired regularly about the status

VANKAR DAYABHAI ,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(4), VADODARA

ITA 2254/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay M. Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Kumar Agrawal, Sr. D.R
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 270ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69

e- Assessment/Faceless Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 under Section 151A of the Act and hence, the notice issued by the JAO is without jurisdiction and illegal and also in violation of Notification No: 18/2022 dtd. 29-03-2022, requires to be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well

VANKAR DAYABHAI ,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(4), VADODARA

ITA 2259/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay M. Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Kumar Agrawal, Sr. D.R
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 270ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69

e- Assessment/Faceless Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 under Section 151A of the Act and hence, the notice issued by the JAO is without jurisdiction and illegal and also in violation of Notification No: 18/2022 dtd. 29-03-2022, requires to be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well

VANKAR DAYABHAI ,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(4), VADODARA

ITA 2261/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay M. Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Kumar Agrawal, Sr. D.R
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 270ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69

e- Assessment/Faceless Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 under Section 151A of the Act and hence, the notice issued by the JAO is without jurisdiction and illegal and also in violation of Notification No: 18/2022 dtd. 29-03-2022, requires to be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well

VANKAR DAYABHAI ,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(4), VADODARA

ITA 2256/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay M. Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Kumar Agrawal, Sr. D.R
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 270ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69

e- Assessment/Faceless Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 under Section 151A of the Act and hence, the notice issued by the JAO is without jurisdiction and illegal and also in violation of Notification No: 18/2022 dtd. 29-03-2022, requires to be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well

VANKAR DAYABHAI ,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(4), VADODARA

ITA 2255/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay M. Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Kumar Agrawal, Sr. D.R
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 270ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69

e- Assessment/Faceless Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 under Section 151A of the Act and hence, the notice issued by the JAO is without jurisdiction and illegal and also in violation of Notification No: 18/2022 dtd. 29-03-2022, requires to be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well

VANKAR DAYABHAI ,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(4), VADODARA

ITA 2258/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay M. Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Kumar Agrawal, Sr. D.R
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 270ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69

e- Assessment/Faceless Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 under Section 151A of the Act and hence, the notice issued by the JAO is without jurisdiction and illegal and also in violation of Notification No: 18/2022 dtd. 29-03-2022, requires to be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well

VANKAR DAYABHAI ,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(4), VADODARA

ITA 2257/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay M. Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Kumar Agrawal, Sr. D.R
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 270ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69

e- Assessment/Faceless Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 under Section 151A of the Act and hence, the notice issued by the JAO is without jurisdiction and illegal and also in violation of Notification No: 18/2022 dtd. 29-03-2022, requires to be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well

VANKAR DAYABHAI ,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(4), VADODARA

ITA 2260/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Akshay M. Modi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Kumar Agrawal, Sr. D.R
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 270ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69

e- Assessment/Faceless Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022 under Section 151A of the Act and hence, the notice issued by the JAO is without jurisdiction and illegal and also in violation of Notification No: 18/2022 dtd. 29-03-2022, requires to be quashed. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well

MR. HASMUKHLAL MAVJIBHAI THAKKAR( PROP. OF M/S. NAVKAR POTEINS),DEESA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WAD-2, PALANPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 29/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2017-18

Section 115BSection 144Section 234ASection 270ASection 68

E-Appeals) (Hereinafter referred to as "Assessing Officer") has confirmed the action of Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 who has passed the ex-parte best judgment assessment order u/s. 144 of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2017-18 on 23/11/2019 which was received by the appellant on 02/12/2019. In the assessment Order the Lrd. Assessing Officer has raised huge

VALJIBHAI ARJANBHAI VEGAD,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(9), BHAVNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1063/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.1063/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Valjibhai Arjanbhai Vegad The Income Tax Officer बनाम/ Rajput Street Ward-1(9) V/S. Nawangam Ga Bhavnagar- 364 002 Tal : Vallabhipur Bhavnagar – 364 313 (Gujarat) "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aykpv 0860 F अपीलाथ&/ (Appellant) '( यथ&/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Mohit Balani, Ar Revenue By : Shri Surendra Kumar, Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 21/11/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Balani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Surendra Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 115BSection 144Section 234ASection 271ASection 69A

e-filing portal with the consultant’s email address for receiving official communications. 2.1. During the demonetization period (November 2016 to December 2016), cash deposits totalling to Rs.12,55,100/- were made in the assessee's bank account, along with other deposits throughout the financial year, aggregating to Rs.66,23,500/-. The AO issued several notices under Sections

AMIT KIRITBHAI MEHTA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 603/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2017-18 Amit Kiritbhai Mehta The Ito, Ward-2(1)(2) 272, Krishna, Manekbaug Society Vejalpur Ambawadi, Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad Pan: Agapm 0534 H (Applicant) (Responent) : None Assessee By Revenue By : Smt.Trupti Patel, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06/05/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 07/05/2025 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश

For Respondent: Smt.Trupti Patel, Sr.DR
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 250(6)Section 69A

E R आदेश आदेश आदेश PER MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR, AM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30.01.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”], under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961[hereinafter referred to as “the Act”] for the assessment year

KEVAL VISION CORPORATION,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 783/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Talati, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. P. Srivastava, Sr. DR
Section 145(3)Section 272A(1)(d)

E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (in short “NFAC”), Delhi vide order dated 27.09.2024 passed for A.Y. 2018-19. 2. At the outset, we note that the present appeal