BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272A(2)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune188Delhi154Chennai76Bangalore43Visakhapatnam37Mumbai36Cochin26Surat22Karnataka21Nagpur19Lucknow14Kolkata10Panaji10Ahmedabad9Cuttack8Hyderabad6Indore4Jaipur4Rajkot3Patna3Raipur3SC2Jodhpur1Amritsar1Guwahati1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 269S10Penalty8Section 272A(1)(d)7Section 271D6Addition to Income6Section 142(1)5Section 1445Section 115B5Limitation/Time-bar

DCIT, CIRCLE GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR vs. SHRI UMIYA CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD LINCH, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 1932/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271ESection 273BSection 3Section 56

272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA or section 2728 or sub- section (1) or sub-section (1A) of section 272BB or sub-section sub-section (1) of section 2 section 2728BB or clause (b) of sub-section (1) or clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 273, no penalty shall be Imposable on the person

5
Section 273B4
Section 684
Cash Deposit4

DCIT CIRCLE GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR vs. SHRI UMIYA CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD LINCH, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 1933/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271ESection 273BSection 3Section 56

272A, sub-section (1) of section 272AA or section 2728 or sub- section (1) or sub-section (1A) of section 272BB or sub-section sub-section (1) of section 2 section 2728BB or clause (b) of sub-section (1) or clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 273, no penalty shall be Imposable on the person

AIR WIND GREEN ENERGY LIMITED,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1, BHAVNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2435/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Varis Isani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri C Dharani Nath, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 272ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 273BSection 274

C Dharani Nath, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 11.03.2026 Date of Pronouncement 12.03.2026 O R D E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (in short “NFAC”), Delhi vide order dated

SOLEONE TRADELINKS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, CIRCLE 4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 603/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Malarkodi R., Sr. DR
Section 144

272A(1)(d) and 270A of the Act, were also initiated. 4. In appeal, CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, on the ground of the inordinate delay of 687 days in filing the appeal. Although an Affidavit for condonation of delay was submitted before CIT(Appeals) stating that delay was on account of mistake of the accountant

MAHEMUDKHAN AJAMUDDIN RANA,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), VADODARA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1198/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Suthar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Hargovind Singh, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 144Section 147Section 2(14)Section 69A

C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.1198/Ahd/2025 (Assessment Year: 2018-19) Mahemudkhan Ajamuddin Rana, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 1/17, Karachia, P.O.: Karachia, Ward-1(3)(1), Tal. Savli, Dist. Vadodara, Vadodara Gujarat-391520 [PAN No.AIIPR9252G] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Hemant Suthar, AR Respondent by: Shri Hargovind Singh

CHUDAJI THAKOR,VASAJADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 2049/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 142(1)Section 148Section 272A(1)(d)Section 273B

C” BENCH Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member And Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member ITA No: 2049/Ahd/2025 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Chudaji Thakor Income Tax Officer, Vasajada, Dhejia, Ward-1, Gandhinagar Garodia, Kalol, Vs Gandhinagar Gandhinagar, Gujart-382721 PAN: AOVPT3573N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented: Ms. Divya S Agarwal, A.R. Revenue Represented: Smt. Ananya Kulshresth, Sr. D.R. Date

MR. HASMUKHLAL MAVJIBHAI THAKKAR( PROP. OF M/S. NAVKAR POTEINS),DEESA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WAD-2, PALANPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 29/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2017-18

Section 115BSection 144Section 234ASection 270ASection 68

C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2017-18 Hasmukhlal Mavjibhai Thakkar, The Income Tax Officer, Proprietor of M/s. Navkar Ward – 2, Proteins, Palanpur. 38, Bhavya Galaxy, Near Diamond Society, Vs. Gayatri mandir Area, Deesa – 385 535, Gujarat. [PAN – AIHPT 2031 P] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Varis

SHRI NAGJIBHAI KUBERBHAI KHENI,BHAVNAGAR vs. ASST UNIT , I TAX DEPT. ( INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(9) BHAVANAGAR ), BHAVNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 862/AHD/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Mar 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2020-21. I.T.A No. 862/Ahd/2023 A.Y. 2020-21 Page No 2 Shri Nagjibhai Keberbhai Kheni vs. ITO 2. The brief facts of the case is that the assessee is an individual and Senior Citizen, engaged in agricultural activities along with

TIMBA MUVADI DUDH MANDALI,MAHIASAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, LUNAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1874/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 Mar 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Shri Tr Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K Patel, ARFor Respondent: Shri Uday Kakne Kishanrao, Sr. DR
Section 234ASection 250(6)Section 271ASection 69C

C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT SHRI TR SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.1874/Ahd/2025 (Assessment Year: 2019-20) Timba Muvadi Dudh Mandali, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Timba Muvadi Lunawada, Ward-1, Mahisagar-389230. Lunawada. [PAN :AAFAT1199 R] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Mehul K Patel, AR Respondent by: Shri Uday Kakne Kishanrao, Sr. DR Date