Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1477 Addition to Income7 Section 253(3)6 Section 1485 Section 1395 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 684 Cash Deposit4 Section 143(3)

KHENGARSINH JADAVBHAI GOHEL ,PETLAD vs. ITO PETLAD, PETLAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 579/AHD/2024[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad21 Jun 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M. Anand Kumar, Sr. D.R

Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 253(3)Section 69A

condone the delay of 33 days and proceed to adjudicate this appeal on merits in accordance with law. 4b) The ld. Departmental Representative submitted and prayed that the order of ld. Addl/JCIT(A) be confirmed. On being asked about the compliance of Section 250(6) by ld. Addl/JCIT(A) while passing the appellate order, the ld. Departmental Representative fairly submitted

KHENGARSINH JADAVBHAI GOHEL ,PETLAD vs. ITO PETLAD, PETLAD

KHENGARSINH JADAVBHAI GOHEL ,PETLAD vs. ITO PETLAD, PETLAD

NIRAJ PRATAPBHAI SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3(3)(2), (FORMERLY ITO, WARD-3(3)(3),, AHMEDABAD

NIRAJ PRATAPBHAI SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(2)(FORMERLY ITO, WARD-3(3)(3)), AHMEDABAD

GOPALKRISHNA NAGINBHAI PATEL,PETLAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(1), PETLAD

SARDARBHAI RAMSANGBHAI DHULIYA ,PALANPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 PREVIOUSLY WARD-5, PALANPUR

ALKABEN KETULKUMAR PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(2), AHMEDABAD

BHARATKUMAR BHIKHABHAI CHAVDA,HARIYALA KHEDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, NADIAD