Search: condonation of delay

160 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 249(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income51 Limitation/Time-bar42 Section 14839 Condonation of Delay33 Section 271(1)(c)28 Penalty27 Section 24925 Section 14425 Section 147

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S REDEX PROTECH P LTD, AHMEDABAD

ITA 462/AHD/2002[95-96]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 May 2019

Bench: The Tribunal Against Order Of The Ld.Cit(A)-Xi, Ahmedabad Dated 31.12.2001 Passed For The Asstt.Year 1995- 96. On Receipt Of Notice In The Revenue’S Appeal, The Assessee Has Filed Cross Objection Bearing No.28/Ahd/2002. Ita No.462/Ahd/2002 & Others With Co (Special Bench)

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar with Shri P.M. Mehta and Shri Parin ShahFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma, CIT-DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 249(4)Section 255(4)Section 264Section 80I

4), there should be a valid appeal following all the requirements of section 249 of the Income Tax Act. Elaborating his arguments, he submitted that suppose an appeal was not filed within time limit provided in the Act, then unless delay ITA No.462/Ahd/2002 & Others with CO (Special Bench) 6 in filing the appeal is being condoned

Showing 1–20 of 160 · Page 1 of 8

...

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S REDEX PROTECH P LTD, AHMEDABAD

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S REDEX PROTECH P LTD, AHMEDABAD

SHRI NAGIN A VAGHELA,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, VADODARA

SHRI NAGIN A VAGHELA,VADODARA vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, VADODARA

WELSPUN PROJECTS LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS MSK PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD.),BARODA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), BARODA

WELSPUN PROJECTS LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS MSK PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD.),BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, RANGE-4,, BARODA

M/S. BRIJLAXMI LEASING & FINANCE LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

SMT. NEELU SANJAY GUPTA,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD

BANYAN & BERRY ALLOYS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD),, AHMEDABAD

RADHE FINSEC INDIA LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD

PRISM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4,, BARODA

PRISM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4,, BARODA

YOGESH JASHUBHAI PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4) NOW WARD- 1(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

YOGESH JASHUBHAI PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4) NOW WARD- 1(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

SHIVAM WATER TREATERS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

SHIVAM WATER TREATERS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

TAHERALI ZABUAWALA,VADODARA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), VADODARA

ATULKUMAR KIRTILAL SHAH,,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(3)(1),, AHMEDABAD

SHRI DILIP KUMARPAL SHAH,,VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)2,, VADODARA

SHRI PINAKIN KUMARPAL SHAH,,VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)2,, VADODARA

SHRI DILIP KUMARPAL SHAH,,VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)2,, VADODARA