LAKHUBHAI NATHUBHAI SISODIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(3), AHMEDABAD, CURRENT ITO WARD 3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 716/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Aug 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal
For Appellant: Shri P D Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Prateek Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69
condone the delay of 763
days in filing the appeal
On merits:
4. The brief facts of the case are that the case of the assessee was reopened under section 147 of the Act for the reason there was the detection of substantial cash deposits in savings bank accounts, amounting
