BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Patna466Pune431Chennai431Bangalore225Delhi213Mumbai95Nagpur78Visakhapatnam59Hyderabad54Cochin44Jaipur40Karnataka21Dehradun21Surat19Kerala19Ahmedabad13Agra10Amritsar10Kolkata10Lucknow10Panaji10Jodhpur9Indore8Rajkot8Raipur6Chandigarh5Ranchi4Guwahati2Jabalpur2

Key Topics

Section 234E40Section 200A30Section 20030Section 206C30Addition to Income11Limitation/Time-bar11TDS10Survey u/s 133A10Section 271(1)(c)

STATE BANK OF INDIA (BHILAD BRANCH),,VALSAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC GHAZIABAD,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 3226/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Jul 2017AY 2013-14

condoning the delay and proceeding to dismiss the appeals summarily; and (ii) against learned CIT(A)’s not holding that the impugned levy of fees under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by way of intimation under section 200A

STATE BANK OF INDIA (SARIGAM BRANCH),,VALSAD vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC GHAZIABAD,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 3267/AHD/2016[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Jul 2017AY 2015-16

condoning the delay and proceeding to dismiss the appeals summarily; and (ii) against learned CIT(A)’s not holding that the impugned levy of fees under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by way of intimation under section 200A

2
Section 1392

M/S. BARODA AGRO CHEMICALS LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2512/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2509 to 2513/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 29 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

M/S. RAVI PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2505/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2504 to 2508/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 70 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

M/S. RAVI PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2507/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2504 to 2508/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 70 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

M/S. BARODA AGRO CHEMICALS LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2510/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2509 to 2513/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 29 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

M/S. RAVI PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2504/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2504 to 2508/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 70 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

M/S. RAVI PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2506/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2504 to 2508/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 70 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

M/S. RAVI PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2508/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2504 to 2508/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 70 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

M/S. BARODA AGRO CHEMICALS LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2509/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2509 to 2513/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 29 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

M/S. BARODA AGRO CHEMICALS LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2513/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2509 to 2513/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 29 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

M/S. BARODA AGRO CHEMICALS LTD.,,HALOL vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS,, GAZIABAD

In the result, all these 5 appeals are allowed

ITA 2511/AHD/2016[2015-16(Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2017
Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234E

section 200A of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.2509 to 2513/Ahd/2016 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Page 2 of 6 3. These appeals are time barred by 29 days. The assessee has moved condonation petition. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative on the same. We are of the considered view that the explanation given by the assessee was reasonable and deserves

LAKHUBHAI NATHUBHAI SISODIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(3), AHMEDABAD, CURRENT ITO WARD 3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 716/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Aug 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri P D Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Prateek Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

condone the delay of 763 days in filing the appeal On merits: 4. The brief facts of the case are that the case of the assessee was reopened under section 147 of the Act for the reason there was the detection of substantial cash deposits in savings bank accounts, amounting