Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata32 Mumbai29 Chennai24 Delhi23 Hyderabad5 Bangalore4 Patna4 Lucknow3 Visakhapatnam2 Indore2 Jaipur2 Rajkot2 Surat2 Varanasi2 Ahmedabad2 Amritsar1 Raipur1 Karnataka1 Jabalpur1 Cochin1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 133(6)3 Section 194J3

LANDMARK LIFESTYLE CARS PRIVATE LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1959/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri B.P. Srivastav, Sr. DR

Section 133(6)Section 194JSection 250

condoned in absence of proper, good and sufficient reasons for delay in the filing the appeal be assessee.” 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assesee company deals in sale of motor Vehicles and motor Parts. The case of the assessee was selected for limited scrutiny to verify the genuineness of large expenses incurred by the Landmark

LANDMARK LIFESTYLE CARS PRIVATE LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

C. D. INTEGRATED SERVICES LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(3) PRESENT JURISDICTION THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

LANDMARK LIFESTYLE CARS PRIVATE LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

C. D. INTEGRATED SERVICES LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(3) PRESENT JURISDICTION THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD