Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai23 Delhi16 Bangalore9 Jaipur8 Chennai7 Kolkata5 Hyderabad3 Allahabad3 Ahmedabad2 Indore2 Nagpur2 Patna2 Telangana1 Visakhapatnam1 Rajkot1 SC1 Surat1 Lucknow1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 364 Section 282 Section 402 Addition to Income2

RATHORE FREIGHT CARRIERS PVT. LTD.,,GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3296/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 3296/Ahd/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Rathore Freight Carriers Pvt. Ltd., D.C.I.T., Plot No.68, Rathore Chamber, Vs. Central Circle-3(1)(2), National Highway, Ahmedabad. Sector No.9/C, Gandhidham, Kitch-370201. Pan: Aabcr0134L

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate, with Shri P.B. Parmar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Sr.D.R

Section 234BSection 271Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40

condone the delay of 415 days in filing the appeal and proceed to hear the appeal on merit for the purpose of adjudication. 6. The 1st issue raised by the assessee is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance made by the AO for Rs. 3,15,000/- on account of diversion of interest-bearing fund

RATHORE FREIGHT CARRIERS PVT. LTD.,,GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

RATHORE FREIGHT CARRIERS PVT. LTD.,,GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

KAMLESH GHANSHYAMDAS THAWANI,KUBERNAGAR, AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7(2)(1) AHMEDABAD, INCOME TAX OFFICE, PRATYAKSHA KAR BHAWAN