BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

97 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai208Pune191Delhi174Kolkata125Jaipur124Ahmedabad97Bangalore85Chennai80Surat40Chandigarh34Lucknow32Rajkot29Hyderabad27Indore26Nagpur24Amritsar15Agra13Raipur11Visakhapatnam9Cochin9Karnataka7Cuttack6Jodhpur6Panaji6Allahabad5Jabalpur4Patna3Punjab & Haryana2Dehradun2Telangana2Varanasi2Rajasthan1SC1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 12A262Section 80G172Section 80G(5)152Section 12A(1)(ac)117Exemption90Section 1167Charitable Trust43Section 2(15)34Section 10

GROW FOUNDATION GANDHINAGAR,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for 9

ITA 734/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri H Phani, CIT. DRFor Respondent: Shri H Phani, CIT. DR
Section 10Section 80Section 80FSection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

vi) and under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. In that case, the provisional registration was granted in form No.10AC on 27.10.2021. Admitted fact in the case is that the assessee Trust commenced its activities from 13.10.2021 being new Trust and assessee filed application for grant of approval under clause (iii) of first proviso

Showing 1–20 of 97 · Page 1 of 5

29
Condonation of Delay29
Section 80G(5)(iii)25
Addition to Income13

THE NA vs. ARI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY,NAVSARIVS.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(E), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 435/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Jun 2024

Bench: 30.09.2022 As It Has Already Commenced 06.03.2004 Activities On 06-03-2022. 2. The Ld Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Has Erred In Facts & In Law In Rejecting The Application Under Section 80G (5) For The Reason That The Trust University Has Made Application For Final Registration Within The Validity Of Provisional Registration & That The Provisional Registration Is Valid Till Ay 2025-26. 3. On The Facts & In Circumstances Of The Case As Well As Law, The Ld. Cit(Exemption) Has Erred In Rejecting Assessee'S Application U/S 80G(5) Filed On 28.03.2023 On The Ground That Assessee Didn'T File The Application Before 30.09.2022 When The Assessee Has Filed The Application In Time As Per The Extension Granted Till 30.09.2023 As Per Circular No.6/2023 Dated 29-05-2023

For Appellant: Shri Rohan Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT-D.R
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

vi) and under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. In that case, the provisional registration was granted in form No.10AC on 27.10.2021. Admitted fact in the case is that the assessee Trust commenced its activities from 13.10.2021 being new Trust and assessee filed application for grant of approval under clause (iii) of first proviso

BHURABHAI PUNJABHAI PARSANA FOUNDATION,RAJKOT, GUJARAT vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION) , AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 428/AHD/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Jun 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Pala, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-D.R
Section 12ASection 80(5)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

vi) and under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. In that case, the provisional registration was granted in form No.10AC on 27.10.2021. Admitted fact in the case is that the assessee Trust commenced its activities from 13.10.2021 being new Trust and assessee filed application for grant of approval under clause (iii) of first proviso

NANA AND RANDER SUNNI VOHRA MEDICAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (EXEMPTION ) AHMEDABAD, AHMRDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1000/AHD/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Ms.Himali Mistry, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

vi) and under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. In that case, the provisional registration was granted in form No.10AC on 27.10.2021. Admitted fact in the case is that the assessee Trust commenced its activities from 13.10.2021 being new Trust and assessee filed application for grant of approval under clause (iii) of first proviso

CLEAN TEETH CLEAN MOUTH CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 95/AHD/2024[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2024AY 2023-2024

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Darshak M Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

vi) and under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. In that case, the provisional registration was granted in form No.10AC on 27.10.2021. Admitted fact in the case is that the assessee Trust commenced its activities from 13.10.2021 being new Trust and assessee filed application for grant of approval under clause (iii) of first proviso

TATAM SEVA SANSTHAN,BHAVNAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMEPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 798/AHD/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Hiren Vepari, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. Darsi Suman Ratnam, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

vi) and under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. In that case, the Tatam Seva Sansthan vs. CIT(E) Asst.Year –2023-24 - 7– provisional registration was granted in form No.10AC on 27.10.2021. Admitted fact in the case is that the assessee Trust commenced its activities from 13.10.2021 being new Trust and assessee filed application

ADANI KINDERGARTEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 860/AHD/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Apr 2024

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar & Shri Parin ShahFor Respondent: Fr. Darsi Suman Ratnam, CIT D.R
Section 80Section 80G

vi) and under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. In that case, the provisional registration was granted in form No.10AC on 27.10.2021. Admitted fact in the case is that the ITA Nos. 859&860/Ahd/2023 Adani Education Foundation/ Adani Kindergarten Education Foundation vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year –N.A. assessee trust commenced its activities from

ADANI EDUCATION FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 859/AHD/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Apr 2024

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar & Shri Parin ShahFor Respondent: Fr. Darsi Suman Ratnam, CIT D.R
Section 80Section 80G

vi) and under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. In that case, the provisional registration was granted in form No.10AC on 27.10.2021. Admitted fact in the case is that the ITA Nos. 859&860/Ahd/2023 Adani Education Foundation/ Adani Kindergarten Education Foundation vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year –N.A. assessee trust commenced its activities from

THE BARODA LAKKAD PITHA PUNCH PROPERTY BARODA,VADODARA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1710/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Jun 2025

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Durga Dutt, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 80G(5)

charitable purposes. It was, therefore, urged that the statutory conditions prescribed under clause (vi)(B) of section 12A(1)(ac) were duly satisfied. 11. As regards the second appeal pertaining to the rejection of approval under section 80G(5) of the Act, the AR, by way of written submission, submitted that the dominant and operative objects of the assessee trust

THE BARODA LAKKAD PITHA PUNCH PROPERTY BARODA,VADODARA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1709/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Jun 2025

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Durga Dutt, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 80G(5)

charitable purposes. It was, therefore, urged that the statutory conditions prescribed under clause (vi)(B) of section 12A(1)(ac) were duly satisfied. 11. As regards the second appeal pertaining to the rejection of approval under section 80G(5) of the Act, the AR, by way of written submission, submitted that the dominant and operative objects of the assessee trust

MAHATMA GANDHI SABARMATI ASHRAM MEMORIAL TRUST(MGSAMT),AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose…”

ITA 1077/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Jan 2025

Bench: Dr.Brr Kumarshri Tr Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Ms Arti N Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT.DR
Section 10Section 80GSection 80G(5)

Section 80G of the Asst.Year NA - 3– I.T. Act, 1961. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the Assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal. We have perused the facts on record and the provisions of the Act along with the judicial precedents on the issue. 4. The sequence of events in this case are as under : Sr.No. Facts

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 265/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

80G(5)(vi) of the Act by and under the order dated 25.04.2006 issued under the signature of the Director of Income Tax (Exemption) being Memo No.DIT(E)/80G/42/W.2/2006-07. The assessee Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 806/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

80G(5)(vi) of the Act by and under the order dated 25.04.2006 issued under the signature of the Director of Income Tax (Exemption) being Memo No.DIT(E)/80G/42/W.2/2006-07. The assessee Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 805/AHD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

80G(5)(vi) of the Act by and under the order dated 25.04.2006 issued under the signature of the Director of Income Tax (Exemption) being Memo No.DIT(E)/80G/42/W.2/2006-07. The assessee Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income

THE ACIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2344/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

80G(5)(vi) of the Act by and under the order dated 25.04.2006 issued under the signature of the Director of Income Tax (Exemption) being Memo No.DIT(E)/80G/42/W.2/2006-07. The assessee Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income

AIA ENGINEERING LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 309/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80G

VI, to say, donations made to charitable trusts registered under section 80G-Held, yes Whether, therefore, since said donation on account of CSR was made by assessee to charitable trusts which were duly registered under section 80G(5

AIA ENGIONEERING LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 310/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80G

VI, to say, donations made to charitable trusts registered under section 80G-Held, yes Whether, therefore, since said donation on account of CSR was made by assessee to charitable trusts which were duly registered under section 80G(5

SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL GANDHINAGAR,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 362/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K Patel, ARFor Respondent: Shri R P Rastogi, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

charitable trust and had made an application for approval u/s 80G(5)(iv)(B) of the Act by filing Form No. 10AB electronically on 26.02.2024. From the application it was evident that the assessee trust had commenced its activities on 17.02.1993. The ld. CIT(Exemption) observed that in order to avail the benefit of section 80G(5

VIDYARTHI ASHRAM,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 425/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 May 2025

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K Patel, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT. DR
Section 12ASection 5Section 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable purpose and if it fulfils the following conditions, namely”– ………………………………. ………………………………. (vi) in relation to donations made after the 31st day of March, 1992, the institution or fund is for the time being "[approved by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner:] ………………………………. ………………………………. Provided that the institution or fund referred to in clause (vi) shall make an application in the prescribed form and manner

THE GANDHINAGAR AYYAPA POOJA SAMITI,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 368/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2025

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri M. K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Aashish Rajesh Rewar, CIT. DR
Section 12ASection 5Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

charitable purpose and if it fulfils the following conditions, namely”– ………………………………. ………………………………. ITA No. 368/Ahd/2025 [The Gandhinagar Ayyapa Pooja Samiti vs. CIT(E)] - 6 – (vi) in relation to donations made after the 31st day of March, 1992, the institution or fund is for the time being "[approved by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner:] ………………………………. ………………………………. Provided that the institution or fund referred