DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

80G(5)(vi) of the Act by and under the order dated 25.04.2006 issued under the signature of the Director of Income Tax (Exemption) being Memo No.DIT(E)/80G/42/W.2/2006-07. The assessee Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

80G(5)(vi) of the Act by and under the order dated 25.04.2006 issued under the signature of the Director of Income Tax (Exemption) being Memo No.DIT(E)/80G/42/W.2/2006-07. The assessee Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

80G(5)(vi) of the Act by and under the order dated 25.04.2006 issued under the signature of the Director of Income Tax (Exemption) being Memo No.DIT(E)/80G/42/W.2/2006-07. The assessee Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income

PRANAM CHARITABLE TRUST ,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Section 80G of the Act. The counsel for the assessee submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) has very selectively cited a few of the objects of the assessee trust to come to the conclusion that the assessee is carrying out religious activity and further did not even analyze whether the assessee trust Pranam Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) Asst.Year

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. UNITED WAY OF BARODA,, VADODARA

In the result, ITA No. 3565/Ahd/16 is dismissed

5 of 15 8. The Assessing Officer thus computed taxable profits at Rs 1,85,46,802. Aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A). Learned CIT(A), in a very elaborate and well reasoned order, reversed the stand of the Assessing Officer and held the assessee to be eligible for section 11 and 12 benefits

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. UNITED WAY OF BARODA,, VADODARA

In the result, ITA No. 3565/Ahd/16 is dismissed

5 of 15 8. The Assessing Officer thus computed taxable profits at Rs 1,85,46,802. Aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A). Learned CIT(A), in a very elaborate and well reasoned order, reversed the stand of the Assessing Officer and held the assessee to be eligible for section 11 and 12 benefits

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. UNITED WAY OF BARODA,, VADODARA

In the result, ITA No. 3565/Ahd/16 is dismissed

5 of 15 8. The Assessing Officer thus computed taxable profits at Rs 1,85,46,802. Aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A). Learned CIT(A), in a very elaborate and well reasoned order, reversed the stand of the Assessing Officer and held the assessee to be eligible for section 11 and 12 benefits

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. UNITED WAY OF BARODA,, VADODARA

In the result, ITA No. 3565/Ahd/16 is dismissed

5 of 15 8. The Assessing Officer thus computed taxable profits at Rs 1,85,46,802. Aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A). Learned CIT(A), in a very elaborate and well reasoned order, reversed the stand of the Assessing Officer and held the assessee to be eligible for section 11 and 12 benefits

DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S.UNITED WAYOF BARODA, VADODARA

In the result, ITA No. 3565/Ahd/16 is dismissed

5 of 15 8. The Assessing Officer thus computed taxable profits at Rs 1,85,46,802. Aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A). Learned CIT(A), in a very elaborate and well reasoned order, reversed the stand of the Assessing Officer and held the assessee to be eligible for section 11 and 12 benefits

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. UNITED WAY OF BARODA,, VADODARA

In the result, ITA No. 3565/Ahd/16 is dismissed

5 of 15 8. The Assessing Officer thus computed taxable profits at Rs 1,85,46,802. Aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A). Learned CIT(A), in a very elaborate and well reasoned order, reversed the stand of the Assessing Officer and held the assessee to be eligible for section 11 and 12 benefits