BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 40A(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi71Mumbai45Chennai23Bangalore21Chandigarh15Amritsar11Visakhapatnam11Pune10Kolkata10Jaipur10Ahmedabad8Surat8Rajkot6Cuttack4Hyderabad3Indore2Nagpur2Jodhpur1Dehradun1Agra1Karnataka1Patna1Telangana1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 2(15)10Section 80I10Section 117Section 35(1)(ii)7Exemption5Deduction4Section 271(1)(c)3Section 13(8)3Section 143(2)3

DISHMAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue and its cross objections are dismissed, whereas the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2593/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Amarjit Sinh

For Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 801ASection 80I

Charitable Trust registered under section 12AA of the Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax. During the course of assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer had issued notice pursuant to which the petitioner had given its reply explaining as to why it was entitled to the said deductions. The Assessing Officer after considering the explanation given by the petitioner had passed

THE ITO, WARD-1(4),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. DISHMAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

Penalty3
Disallowance3
Survey u/s 133A3

In the result, appeal of the Revenue and its cross objections are dismissed, whereas the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2663/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Amarjit Sinh

For Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 801ASection 80I

Charitable Trust registered under section 12AA of the Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax. During the course of assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer had issued notice pursuant to which the petitioner had given its reply explaining as to why it was entitled to the said deductions. The Assessing Officer after considering the explanation given by the petitioner had passed

PARAG DAVE,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) (PREVIOUSLY CIRCLE-3(3)), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 894/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Makarand V. Mahadeokarassessment Year 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Khandhar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Amit Pratap Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 35(1)(ii)Section 36(1)

3 is dismissed. 6. As regards ground nos. 1 and 2, the ld. A.R. submitted that the CIT(A) was not right in rejecting the claim of deduction u/s. 35(1)(ii) of Rs. 26,25,000/- in respect of amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- contributed by the assessee through RTGS and the same is based on irrelevant

THE DY. CIT (EXEMPTIONS),, AHMEDABAD vs. FRIENDS OF WWB INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1549/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 2(15)Section 40A(2)(a)

3. The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue reads as under:- “1) The Ld.CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in allowing the payment of Rs.5 cores made to IFGI holding it to be not covered by section 40A(2)(a) of the Act and treating it as allowable expenditure. 2) The Ld.CIT(A) has erred

THE DCIT(EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD vs. FRIENDS OF WWB,INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1117/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad

For Appellant: Shri Mudit Nagpal, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 2(15)Section 40A(2)(a)Section 56

3. The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue as under:- “1) The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in allowing the payment of Rs. 5 crores made to IFGI holding it to be not covered by section 40A(2)(a) of the Act and treating it as allowable expenditure

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,, VADODARA

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 999/AHD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad1. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.999/Ahd/2017 2. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1000/Ahd/2017 3. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1001/Ahd/2017 (Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively)

For Appellant: Ms.Aparna M.Agarwal, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Nirmit Mehta, AR
Section 11Section 13(8)Section 2(15)Section 271(1)(c)

Trust) engaged in the activity of promoting the game of cricket. It filed its return of income for AY 2009-10 in question declaring total income in the negative at Rs.(-)1,57,21,610/- and thereafter filed the revised return on 31/03/2011 showing revised total income in negative at Rs.(-) 4,50,00,000/-. The ITA Nos.999, 1000, 1001/Ahd/2017

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,, VADODARA

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1001/AHD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad1. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.999/Ahd/2017 2. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1000/Ahd/2017 3. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1001/Ahd/2017 (Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively)

For Appellant: Ms.Aparna M.Agarwal, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Nirmit Mehta, AR
Section 11Section 13(8)Section 2(15)Section 271(1)(c)

Trust) engaged in the activity of promoting the game of cricket. It filed its return of income for AY 2009-10 in question declaring total income in the negative at Rs.(-)1,57,21,610/- and thereafter filed the revised return on 31/03/2011 showing revised total income in negative at Rs.(-) 4,50,00,000/-. The ITA Nos.999, 1000, 1001/Ahd/2017

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,, VADODARA

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1000/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad1. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.999/Ahd/2017 2. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1000/Ahd/2017 3. आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1001/Ahd/2017 (Assessment Years : 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively)

For Appellant: Ms.Aparna M.Agarwal, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Nirmit Mehta, AR
Section 11Section 13(8)Section 2(15)Section 271(1)(c)

Trust) engaged in the activity of promoting the game of cricket. It filed its return of income for AY 2009-10 in question declaring total income in the negative at Rs.(-)1,57,21,610/- and thereafter filed the revised return on 31/03/2011 showing revised total income in negative at Rs.(-) 4,50,00,000/-. The ITA Nos.999, 1000, 1001/Ahd/2017