PRAYATNA CHARITABLE TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

section 80G(5)(ii) and Explanation 3, and was therefore not eligible for registration. CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application filed in Form 10AB and cancelled the provisional registration granted earlier to Prayatna Charitable Trust. 4

DR K R SHROFF FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1, EXMP, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed\n\n29

3) of the Act. The Assessing Officer had denied the\nexemption under Section 11 & 12 of the Act for the reason that according\nto the Assessing Officer, the assessee was not engaged in any charitable\nactivity. The main object of the Trust was to provide better quality\neducation to teachers and students in the Government Schools.\nAccording to the Assessing

ACIT (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE 1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. DR K R SHROFF FOUNDATION, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed\n\n29

3) of the Act. The Assessing Officer had denied the\nexemption under Section 11 & 12 of the Act for the reason that according\nto the Assessing Officer, the assessee was not engaged in any charitable\nactivity. The main object of the Trust was to provide better quality\neducation to teachers and students in the Government Schools.\nAccording to the Assessing

DCIT (EXMP) CIRCLE 1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. GUJARAT STATE BOARD OF SCHOOL TEXT BOOK, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, both the M

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

charitable or religious purposes. Accordingly, the AO disallowed the exemption claimed by the Assessee Trust. 2.2 Thus Ld. A.O. framed the Assessment Order under section 143(3) of the Act on 17/12/2018 assessing total income of the assessee at Rs.16,37,29,790/- invoking section 11(4

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. GUJARAT STATE BOARD OF SCHOOL TEXT BOOK, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, both the M

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

charitable or religious purposes. Accordingly, the AO disallowed the exemption claimed by the Assessee Trust. 2.2 Thus Ld. A.O. framed the Assessment Order under section 143(3) of the Act on 17/12/2018 assessing total income of the assessee at Rs.16,37,29,790/- invoking section 11(4

DCIT(E), CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. GUJARAT STATE BOARD OF SCHOOL TEXT BOOK, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, both the M

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

charitable or religious purposes. Accordingly, the AO disallowed the exemption claimed by the Assessee Trust. 2.2 Thus Ld. A.O. framed the Assessment Order under section 143(3) of the Act on 17/12/2018 assessing total income of the assessee at Rs.16,37,29,790/- invoking section 11(4

DCIT (EXMP) CIRCLE-1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. GUJARAT STATE BOARD OF SCHOOL TEXT BOOK, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, both the M

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

charitable or religious purposes. Accordingly, the AO disallowed the exemption claimed by the Assessee Trust. 2.2 Thus Ld. A.O. framed the Assessment Order under section 143(3) of the Act on 17/12/2018 assessing total income of the assessee at Rs.16,37,29,790/- invoking section 11(4

SHRI SOUDHARMA BRIHAD TAPOGACHCHIYA TRISTUTIK JAIN SANGHA SAMARPANAM,AHMEDABAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is devoid of\nmerits and the same is hereby dismissed

charitable trust.\n4. On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the\nlearned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has erred in holding that\nassessee-trust has conducted 'specified violations' as per the explanation to\nsection 12AB(4) of the Act without considering that objects of assessee trust are\nnot limited to benefit

SHRI RAJESH RAVINDRAN CHARITY TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

Trust. vs. CIT(E)] - 4 – expenditure on religious activity being limited to the extent specified in Section 80G(5B) of the Act. The ITAT interpreted the provisions of Section 80G, 80G(5)(ii), Explanation (3) to Section 80G(5) and Section 80G(5B) of the Act by holding so in a recent decision in the case of Shree Sthanakvasi Jain

CHAMUNDA FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT,, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the CO No.83/Ahd/2015 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl.

4) As per section 12AA(3) of the Act, the Ld. CIT can exercise the But, the Assessee trust does not fall in the above two situations. So the question of the cancellation of the certificate does not arise. However, the Ld. CIT after considering the submission made by the assessee observed as under: 1) The provision of section 12AA

ITO(EXEMPTIONS),, AHMEDABAD vs. CHAMUNDA FOUNDATION,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the CO No.83/Ahd/2015 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl.

4) As per section 12AA(3) of the Act, the Ld. CIT can exercise the But, the Assessee trust does not fall in the above two situations. So the question of the cancellation of the certificate does not arise. However, the Ld. CIT after considering the submission made by the assessee observed as under: 1) The provision of section 12AA

KOSHAMBH CHARITABLE TRUST,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-EXEMPTION, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

4. Your Appellant reserves the right to add, alter, amend or withdraw any of the above grounds of appeal.” Koshambh Charitable Trust vs. ITO Asst.Year –2017-18 - 2– 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee, a Trust, registered under Section

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-2, AHMEDABAD vs. SHREE KHODAL DHAM TRUST, KAGWAD, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedअपील सं./Ita No.904/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2014-2015 D.C.I.T.(Exemptions) Shree Khodal Dham Trust, Circle-2, Vs. Kagwad, Ahmedabad. Alka Society, 4Th Floor, Shri Sardar Patel Bhavan, Near Water Tank, Rajkot-360004. Pan: Aajts1017J

3 of 15 Asstt. Year 2014-15 • Expenditure on its stated objects of the trust deed, i.e.-educational, Medical, Monitory help, refinement and social development could not be deciphered from any bills or details produced during assessment proceedings. 5.3 From the perusal of the details on record and the website of the assessee trust, it is established that the assessee

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

3. The brief facts leading to this case is this that the assessee trust came into existence in the year 1996 registered under section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act by and under the order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-II, Bangalore, being Memo No. Trust/718/10A/Vol.A-III, V- ITA Nos.265, 805, 806 & 2344/Ahd/2018 DCIT vs. VyaktiVikas Kendra

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

3. The brief facts leading to this case is this that the assessee trust came into existence in the year 1996 registered under section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act by and under the order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-II, Bangalore, being Memo No. Trust/718/10A/Vol.A-III, V- ITA Nos.265, 805, 806 & 2344/Ahd/2018 DCIT vs. VyaktiVikas Kendra

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

3. The brief facts leading to this case is this that the assessee trust came into existence in the year 1996 registered under section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act by and under the order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-II, Bangalore, being Memo No. Trust/718/10A/Vol.A-III, V- ITA Nos.265, 805, 806 & 2344/Ahd/2018 DCIT vs. VyaktiVikas Kendra

THE ACIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

3. The brief facts leading to this case is this that the assessee trust came into existence in the year 1996 registered under section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act by and under the order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-II, Bangalore, being Memo No. Trust/718/10A/Vol.A-III, V- ITA Nos.265, 805, 806 & 2344/Ahd/2018 DCIT vs. VyaktiVikas Kendra

THE ITO, (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. GUJARAT INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.219/Ahd/2018 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2013-2014 Income Tax Officer, Gujarat Institute Of Chemical (Exemptions), Vs. Technology, Ward-1, Suraksha Sankool, Thaltej Ahmedabad. Gandhinagar Highway Thaltej, Ahmedabad-380054. Pan : Aaatg2481M

4,75,00,000 on account of the disallowance of the donation made by the assessee. 3. The facts in brief are that the assessee in the present case is an AOP (trust) and registered with the Charity Commissioner vide registration number F/349/Ahmedabad dated 23/05/1968 as well as under section 12A/80G of the Act. The main activity of the assessee