BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 35(2)(ab)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka102Mumbai82Bangalore46Chennai40Delhi40Chandigarh29Cochin27Jaipur27Hyderabad19Ahmedabad16Cuttack16Pune15Indore12Kolkata10Lucknow7Agra6Kerala5Dehradun4Varanasi2Rajasthan1Rajkot1SC1Surat1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Telangana1Jodhpur1Visakhapatnam1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 80G(5)35Section 12A29Section 80G19Section 80G(5)(iii)12Exemption12Section 80I10Section 2(15)6Section 116Section 80G(5)(iv)

ITO(EXEMPTIONS),, AHMEDABAD vs. CHAMUNDA FOUNDATION,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the CO No.83/Ahd/2015 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 829/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl.

For Appellant: Shri M.S. Chhajed, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jagdish, CIT-DR &
Section 12ASection 2(15)

ab initio. Even Assessment order passed on the basis of said notice is bad and required to be quashed. Appellant has drawn the attention of the Ld.A.O. that no valid notice U/S. 143(2) of the Act is issued by him. Appellant also objected that in absence legal and valid notice U/S 143(2) of the Act, assessment proceedings

CHAMUNDA FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT,, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the CO No.83/Ahd/2015 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

4
Charitable Trust4
Limitation/Time-bar4
Natural Justice3
ITA 1071/AHD/2013[-]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 May 2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl.

For Appellant: Shri M.S. Chhajed, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jagdish, CIT-DR &
Section 12ASection 2(15)

ab initio. Even Assessment order passed on the basis of said notice is bad and required to be quashed. Appellant has drawn the attention of the Ld.A.O. that no valid notice U/S. 143(2) of the Act is issued by him. Appellant also objected that in absence legal and valid notice U/S 143(2) of the Act, assessment proceedings

CLEAN TEETH CLEAN MOUTH CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 95/AHD/2024[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2024AY 2023-2024

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Darshak M Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

ab), the person in receipt of the income who wants to claim benefit of section 11 & 12 is to made an application in the prescribed form 10A or 10AB and in prescribed manner to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, for registration of the Trust or institution. 7.3 Similarly, for approval u/s.80G of the Act, similar changes were effected

NANA AND RANDER SUNNI VOHRA MEDICAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (EXEMPTION ) AHMEDABAD, AHMRDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1000/AHD/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Ms.Himali Mistry, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

ab), the person in receipt of the income who wants to claim benefit of section 11 & 12 is to made an application in the prescribed form 10A or 10AB and in prescribed manner to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, for registration of the Trust or institution. 7.3 Similarly, for approval u/s.80G of the Act, similar changes were effected

THE ITO, WARD-1(4),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. DISHMAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue and its cross objections are dismissed, whereas the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2663/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Amarjit Sinh

For Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 801ASection 80I

Charitable Trust registered under section 12AA of the Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax. During the course of assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer had issued notice pursuant to which the petitioner had given its reply explaining as to why it was entitled to the said deductions. The Assessing Officer after considering the explanation given by the petitioner had passed

DISHMAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(4),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue and its cross objections are dismissed, whereas the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2593/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Amarjit Sinh

For Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 801ASection 80I

Charitable Trust registered under section 12AA of the Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax. During the course of assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer had issued notice pursuant to which the petitioner had given its reply explaining as to why it was entitled to the said deductions. The Assessing Officer after considering the explanation given by the petitioner had passed

THE NA vs. ARI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY,NAVSARIVS.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(E), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 435/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Jun 2024

Bench: 30.09.2022 As It Has Already Commenced 06.03.2004 Activities On 06-03-2022. 2. The Ld Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Has Erred In Facts & In Law In Rejecting The Application Under Section 80G (5) For The Reason That The Trust University Has Made Application For Final Registration Within The Validity Of Provisional Registration & That The Provisional Registration Is Valid Till Ay 2025-26. 3. On The Facts & In Circumstances Of The Case As Well As Law, The Ld. Cit(Exemption) Has Erred In Rejecting Assessee'S Application U/S 80G(5) Filed On 28.03.2023 On The Ground That Assessee Didn'T File The Application Before 30.09.2022 When The Assessee Has Filed The Application In Time As Per The Extension Granted Till 30.09.2023 As Per Circular No.6/2023 Dated 29-05-2023

For Appellant: Shri Rohan Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT-D.R
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

ab), the person in receipt of the income who wants to claim benefit of section 11 & 12 is to made an application in the prescribed form 10A or 10AB and in prescribed manner to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, for registration of the Trust or institution. 7.3 Similarly, for approval u/s.80G of the Act, similar changes were effected

TATAM SEVA SANSTHAN,BHAVNAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMEPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 798/AHD/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Hiren Vepari, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. Darsi Suman Ratnam, CIT-DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

ab), the person in receipt of the income who wants to claim benefit of section 11 & Tatam Seva Sansthan vs. CIT(E) Asst.Year –2023-24 - 6– 12 is to made an application in the prescribed form 10A or 10AB and in prescribed manner to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, for registration of the Trust or institution. 7.3 Similarly, for approval

BHURABHAI PUNJABHAI PARSANA FOUNDATION,RAJKOT, GUJARAT vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION) , AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 428/AHD/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Jun 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Pala, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-D.R
Section 12ASection 80(5)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

ab), the person in receipt of the income who wants to claim benefit of section 11 & 12 is to made an application in the prescribed form 10A or 10AB and in prescribed manner to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, for registration of the Trust or institution. 7.3 Similarly, for approval u/s.80G of the Act, similar changes were effected

GROW FOUNDATION GANDHINAGAR,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for 9

ITA 734/AHD/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri H Phani, CIT. DRFor Respondent: Shri H Phani, CIT. DR
Section 10Section 80Section 80FSection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

ab), the person in receipt of the income who wants to claim benefit of section 11 & 12 is to made an application in the prescribed form 10A or 10AB and in prescribed manner to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, for registration of the Trust or institution. 7.3 Similarly, for approval u/s.80G of the Act, similar changes were effected

ASH EDUCATION TRUST,MEHSANA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1 (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1831/AHD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Sanjay Kumar Lal, CIT DR
Section 11Section 143(1)Section 154

charitable trust past 30 years who substantially satisfies the condition for availing such exemption, should not be denied the same merely on the bar of limitation especially when the legislature has conferred wide discretionary powers to condone such delay on the authorities concerned. 32. We may also refer to the decision of this Court in CIT v. Gujarat

ASH EDUCATION TRUST,MEHSANA vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1 (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

ITA 1830/AHD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jun 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: \nShri Mehul Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Sanjay Kumar Lal, CIT DR
Section 11Section 143(1)Section 154

charitable\ntrust registered under Section 12A of the Act had substantially satisfied\ncondition for availing benefit of exemption as a trust, it could not be\ndenied exemption merely on bar of limitation in furnishing audit report in\nForm No. 10B. While passing the order the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court\nmade the following observations:\n\"31. Having given

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 296/AHD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Sh. Umedsingh Bhati & Sh. Abhimanyu SinghFor Respondent: Sh. Subhendu Das, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 253(3)Section 69C

AB of the Customs Act 1962). The said acts of omission and commission on the part of the M/s. Bishnoi Trading Corporation have rendered themselves liable for penalty under the provisions of Section 114A/112(a) & 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The said goods, as detailed in Annexure-'A' to this SCN and which is not physically available for seizure

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 297/AHD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Sh. Umedsingh Bhati & Sh. Abhimanyu SinghFor Respondent: Sh. Subhendu Das, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 253(3)Section 69C

AB of the Customs Act 1962). The said acts of omission and commission on the part of the M/s. Bishnoi Trading Corporation have rendered themselves liable for penalty under the provisions of Section 114A/112(a) & 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The said goods, as detailed in Annexure-'A' to this SCN and which is not physically available for seizure

JAN MANGAL PHARMACY FOUNDATION,,VALSAD vs. CIT, (EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD

The appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 680/AHD/2018[N.A.]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Feb 2020

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.679 & 680/Ahd/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : - )

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K. Patel, ARFor Respondent: Shri Samir Tekriwal, CIT-DR
Section 12A

35 taxmann.com 104 (Gujarat) wherein it was held as under: “Section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Charitable or religious trust – Procedure for registration [Denial of registration] – Whether where there was no material to conclude that objects of trust or activities of trust were not genuine or any doubt arose in respect of genuineness of activities, registration under section

JAN MANGAL PHARMACY FOUNDATION,,VALSAD vs. CIT, (EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD

The appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 679/AHD/2018[N.A.]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Feb 2020

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.679 & 680/Ahd/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : - )

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K. Patel, ARFor Respondent: Shri Samir Tekriwal, CIT-DR
Section 12A

35 taxmann.com 104 (Gujarat) wherein it was held as under: “Section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Charitable or religious trust – Procedure for registration [Denial of registration] – Whether where there was no material to conclude that objects of trust or activities of trust were not genuine or any doubt arose in respect of genuineness of activities, registration under section