DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

charitable or religious purposes in India falls short of 34[eighty-five] per cent of the income derived during that year from property held under trust, or, as the case may be, held under trust in part, by any amount— (i) for the reason that the whole or any part of the income has not been received during that year

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

charitable or religious purposes in India falls short of 34[eighty-five] per cent of the income derived during that year from property held under trust, or, as the case may be, held under trust in part, by any amount— (i) for the reason that the whole or any part of the income has not been received during that year

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

charitable or religious purposes in India falls short of 34[eighty-five] per cent of the income derived during that year from property held under trust, or, as the case may be, held under trust in part, by any amount— (i) for the reason that the whole or any part of the income has not been received during that year

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-2, AHMEDABAD vs. SHREE KHODAL DHAM TRUST, KAGWAD, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedअपील सं./Ita No.904/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2014-2015 D.C.I.T.(Exemptions) Shree Khodal Dham Trust, Circle-2, Vs. Kagwad, Ahmedabad. Alka Society, 4Th Floor, Shri Sardar Patel Bhavan, Near Water Tank, Rajkot-360004. Pan: Aajts1017J

Section 12AA in existence. The finding of the AO that the presence of Garbhgruh and Rangmandap means that the trust is religious, is held to be factually incorrect. 7.4 The next finding of the AO is that, the details so provided by the appellant trust nowhere reveal that the trust had done major charitable activities. He also held that, from

ITO(EXEMPTIONS),, AHMEDABAD vs. CHAMUNDA FOUNDATION,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the CO No.83/Ahd/2015 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl.

Charitable Trust derived from building, plant and machinery and furniture was liable to be computed in normal commercial manner although the Trust may not be carrying on any business and the assets in respect whereof depreciation is claimed may not be business assets. In all such cases, section 32 of the Income-tax Act providing for depreciation for computation

CHAMUNDA FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT,, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the CO No.83/Ahd/2015 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl.

Charitable Trust derived from building, plant and machinery and furniture was liable to be computed in normal commercial manner although the Trust may not be carrying on any business and the assets in respect whereof depreciation is claimed may not be business assets. In all such cases, section 32 of the Income-tax Act providing for depreciation for computation

CLEAN TEETH CLEAN MOUTH CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

35 of the Act, till 30.06.2024; (ii) Form No. 10AB, in case of an application under clause (iii) of the first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 or under sub-clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section ( I) of section 12A or under clause (iii) of the first proviso to sub-section (5) of section

ANNAPURNA CHARITABLE TRUST,BANASKANTHA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Us Raising The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

charitable to public at large in nature, which are mixed objects. 4.1. Therefore the solitary question that arise for consideration is whether a Trust created before 01-04-2021 can be denied registration under section 12AB of the Act and by invoking the provisions of Section 13(1)(b) of the Act? This issue is no more res- integra since

NANA AND RANDER SUNNI VOHRA MEDICAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (EXEMPTION ) AHMEDABAD, AHMRDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

35 of the Act, till 30.06.2024; (ii) Form No. 10AB, in case of an application under clause (iii) of the first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 or under sub-clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section ( I) of section 12A or under clause (iii) of the first proviso to sub-section (5) of section

DR K R SHROFF FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1, EXMP, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed\n\n29

charitable trust in existence since\n2001 and registered under Section 12AA of the Act. The assessee\nhad received 80,00,000 numbers of equity shares of e-Infochips\nLimited as corpus donation from its trustee Shri Pratul Krishnakant\nShroff on 12.12.2017. Thereafter, all the shares of e-Infochips\nLimited, including those held by the assessee, were acquired by\nArrow Electronics

SHRI BHAVNAGAR DASHASHRIMALI KANTHIBANDH (VAISHNAV) VANIK GNATI,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

35 Guj), Bayath Kutchhi Dasa Oswal Jain Mahajan Trust (2017 8 ITR-OL 494 Guj), etc. were all rendered under the pre-amendment legal regime. Those decisions interpreted section 12AA (old law), not section 12AB (new law). Hence, the Co-ordinate Bench limited their binding force only to trusts created before 01-04-2021, because for such trusts, their rights

ACIT (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE 1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. DR K R SHROFF FOUNDATION, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed\n\n29

charitable trust in existence since\n2001 and registered under Section 12AA of the Act. The assessee\nhad received 80,00,000 numbers of equity shares of e-Infochips\nLimited as corpus donation from its trustee Shri Pratul Krishnakant\nShroff on 12.12.2017. Thereafter, all the shares of e-Infochips\nLimited, including those held by the assessee, were acquired by\nArrow Electronics

SHREE SANAND JAMALIYA PATIDAR PANCH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed

Bench: DR. BRR KUMAR (Vice President), Shri T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR (Judicial Member)

charitable to public at large in nature, which are mixed objects. 4.1. Therefore the solitary question that arise for consideration is whether a Trust created before 01-04-2021 can be denied registration under section 12AB of the Act and by invoking the provisions of Section 13(1)(b) of the Act? This issue is no more res-integra since

SHRI BHAVNAGAR DASHASHRIMALI KANTHIBANDH (VAISHNAV) VANIK GNATI,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

35 and\nCIT v. Bayath Kutchhi Dasa Oswal Jain Mahajan Trust (2017) 8 ITR-OL 494\n(Guj), held that\n5. The above judgments will hold good to a Trust created before 01-04-\n2021. Since the assessee has to first cross the hurdle of being eligible\nto exemption under section 11 by obtaining a certificate of registration\nunder section

P.M. BHIMANI ORGOCHEM PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

35(1)(ii) of the Act. 7.2 Regarding the donation made to the “NCT”, we note that the benefit of the deduction under section 35AC of the Act was denied to the assessee on the reasoning that the trustee of such trust in the statement given under section 133A during the survey operation has admitted the fact

P.M. BHIMANI ORGOCHEM PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

35(1)(ii) of the Act. 7.2 Regarding the donation made to the “NCT”, we note that the benefit of the deduction under section 35AC of the Act was denied to the assessee on the reasoning that the trustee of such trust in the statement given under section 133A during the survey operation has admitted the fact

P.M. BHIMANI ORGOCHEM PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

35(1)(ii) of the Act. 7.2 Regarding the donation made to the “NCT”, we note that the benefit of the deduction under section 35AC of the Act was denied to the assessee on the reasoning that the trustee of such trust in the statement given under section 133A during the survey operation has admitted the fact

BRAHMAKSHATRIYA KANJI DAMJI HINDU SARVAJANIK DHARAMSHALA PALITANA,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

trust and above referred objects, which are in the nature of charitable is restricted to benefit of a particular religious community or caste "Hindu" and therefore as per law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex court in the above referred cases, the provision of sec 13(1)(b) would be applicable and therefore the applicant/assessee would not be eligible