DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

section 12 shall be deemed to be part of the income; (2) if, in the previous year, the income applied to charitable or religious purposes in India falls short of 34[eighty-five] per cent of the income derived during that year from property held under trust

THE ACIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

section 12 shall be deemed to be part of the income; (2) if, in the previous year, the income applied to charitable or religious purposes in India falls short of 34[eighty-five] per cent of the income derived during that year from property held under trust

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

section 12 shall be deemed to be part of the income; (2) if, in the previous year, the income applied to charitable or religious purposes in India falls short of 34[eighty-five] per cent of the income derived during that year from property held under trust

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-2, AHMEDABAD vs. SHREE KHODAL DHAM TRUST, KAGWAD, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedअपील सं./Ita No.904/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2014-2015 D.C.I.T.(Exemptions) Shree Khodal Dham Trust, Circle-2, Vs. Kagwad, Ahmedabad. Alka Society, 4Th Floor, Shri Sardar Patel Bhavan, Near Water Tank, Rajkot-360004. Pan: Aajts1017J

charitable in nature. 3. The facts in brief are that the assessee in the present case is a trust and registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1950 vide registration No. E/8846/Rajkot dated 18th March 2010 with the Assistant Charity Commissioner of Rajkot region. The assessee was also registered under the provisions of section

CHAMUNDA FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT,, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the CO No.83/Ahd/2015 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl.

Trust from the property held for charitable or religious purposes and it also provides for application and accumulation of income. On the other hand, section 28 of the Income-tax Act deals with chargeability of income from profits and gains of business and section 29 provides that income from profits and gains of business shall be computed in accordance with

ITO(EXEMPTIONS),, AHMEDABAD vs. CHAMUNDA FOUNDATION,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the CO No.83/Ahd/2015 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl.

Trust from the property held for charitable or religious purposes and it also provides for application and accumulation of income. On the other hand, section 28 of the Income-tax Act deals with chargeability of income from profits and gains of business and section 29 provides that income from profits and gains of business shall be computed in accordance with

THE DY. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. UTTHAN SEWA TRUST,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad)

Trust from the property held for charitable or religious purposes and it also provides for application and accumulation of income. On the other hand, section 28 of the Income Tax Act deals with chargeability of income from profits and gains of business and section 29 provides that income from profits and gains of business ahll be computed in accordance with

ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 3054 CHARITABLE TRUST ,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs 34, World Business House, Near Parimal Garden, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad-380006 PAN: AAETR1710L (Respondent) (Appellant) Assessee Represented: Shri Anil Kshatriya, Advocate Revenue Represented: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR Date of hearing : 27-08-2024 Date of pronouncement : 26-11-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against

THE JT. CIT(EXEMPTION)(OSD), CIRCLE-2, AHMEDABAD vs. DIVYA JYOTI TRUST, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Waseem Ahmed & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2015-16 Jt.Cit (Exemptions)(Osd) Divya Jyoti Trust Cir.2, Ahmedabad. Vs Tejas Eye Hospital Suthar Faliyaat & Post – Mandvi Surat 394 610. Pan : Aabtd 3401 D अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ketan Jagirdar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Urjit Shah, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 17/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 25/02/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against Order Dated 7.6.2019 In Appeal No. Cit(A)-9/10321/Dcit(E), Cir.2-/17-18Passed By The Ld.Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-9, Ahmedabad [For Short “Ld.Cit(A)] Relating To The Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

charitable trust registered under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 as well as registered under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) Assessee-trust was engaged for the services of poor people in the field of eye-care needs. The founder of the trust himself is Ophthalmologist. The Trust has begun with an eye-hospital

M/S. ARMEE INFOTECH,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, ITA No.1778/Ahd/2016 (by Revenue) is dismissed, and ITA No

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1778/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Acit,Cir.6(1), Vs. Armee Infotech Ahmedabad. 1002, Akik Building Opp: Rajpath Club, Sg Highway, Ahmedabad 380 0054. Pan : Aaifa 4964 D

charitable status could be cancelled. Registration under section 12AA could be cancelled as per the procedure contemplated in section 12AA(3) of the Act. The funds which were not used for objects of the Trust, that can be brought to tax under section 13(3) of the Act. A perusal of the scheme of Income Tax Act, it would reveal

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-6(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. ARMEE INFOTECH,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, ITA No.1778/Ahd/2016 (by Revenue) is dismissed, and ITA No

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1778/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Acit,Cir.6(1), Vs. Armee Infotech Ahmedabad. 1002, Akik Building Opp: Rajpath Club, Sg Highway, Ahmedabad 380 0054. Pan : Aaifa 4964 D

charitable status could be cancelled. Registration under section 12AA could be cancelled as per the procedure contemplated in section 12AA(3) of the Act. The funds which were not used for objects of the Trust, that can be brought to tax under section 13(3) of the Act. A perusal of the scheme of Income Tax Act, it would reveal

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION),CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. NANDESARI INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION,, NANDESARI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed)

Section 2(15) of the Act defines 'charitable purposes'. First proviso, thereto with effect from assessment year 2009-10 laid down that, if any trust etc. (a) is engaged in pursuing objects of general public utility ('other objects') and (b) carries on any activity in the nature of trade, business or commerce or provides any services in relation

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. MUDRA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH & EDUCATION,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

Section 11 of the Act in respect of income applied for charitable purposes, in the return of income, the appellant had claimed the exemption in respect of capital expenditure of Rs.1,34,89,333/- as application of income for charitable purposes. The AO has held that as per normal accounting principles the expenses have to be spread over the useful

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. MUDRA FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH & EDUCATION,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

Section 11 of the Act in respect of income applied for charitable purposes, in the return of income, the appellant had claimed the exemption in respect of capital expenditure of Rs.1,34,89,333/- as application of income for charitable purposes. The AO has held that as per normal accounting principles the expenses have to be spread over the useful

THE ACIT(E), CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD vs. UTTHAN SEVA SANSTHAN, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year :2015-16

charitable trust enjoying exemption under section 12A from the year 2010 as well as granted approval under section 80G(5) of the Act from 2012 onwards. For the Asst.Year 2015-16, the assessee filed its return of income on 24.2.2016 claiming deficit of Rs.5,71,98,746/-. The reasons for deficit was that the assessee claimed accumulation amounting to Rs.1

THE ITO(EXEMPTIONS), WARD-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. POLIO FOUNDATION,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

sections 60 to 63, the following income shall not be included in the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt of the income— [(a) income derived from property 34 held under trust wholly for charitable

BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,,VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT, (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal is allowed in the terms indicated above

34. What essentially follows from the above discussions is that, even after the 2008 amendment and insertion of proviso to Section 2(15), so far as 'any other object of general public utility is concerned, as long as profit earning is not the predominant purpose of the activity of the assessee, the benefit of Section 2(15) cannot be declined

BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,,VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT, (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal is allowed

34. What essentially follows from the above discussions is that, even after the 2008 amendment and insertion of proviso to Section 2(15), so far as 'any other object of general public utility is concerned, as long as profit earning is not the predominant purpose of the activity of the assessee, the benefit of Section 2(15) cannot be declined

VINAYAKA EDUCATION TRUST,NADIAD vs. THE DDIT, CPC, BENGALURU JURIS. AO- THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

34,360/-.\nITA 1402/Ahd/2025\nAsst. Year: 2021-22\n2\n2. Facts of the Case\n2.1 The brief factual background of the case, as emanating from the\nassessment records and the orders of the lower authorities, is that the\nassessee, a charitable trust registered under section