BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi88Karnataka37Mumbai30Bangalore22Calcutta21Amritsar11Telangana11Indore11Chennai8Jaipur6Hyderabad6Punjab & Haryana4SC4Ahmedabad3Agra3Allahabad3Kolkata3Cochin3Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Lucknow2Pune2Rajasthan2J&K1Rajkot1Chandigarh1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6Section 115Section 1544Section 80I4Section 271(1)(c)2Section 222Deduction2

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(EXEMPTIONS)CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. SURAT URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(SUDA), SURAT

In the result, the appeal preferred by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5/AHD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Nov 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Prateek Toshniwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT DR
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 22

trust fails to apply the entire income of the year. Therefore, the addition is not justified as SUDA is eligible to claim INR ACIT vs. Surat Urban Development Authority Asst.Year –2015-16 9,10,65,153/- as 15% deduction u/s ll(l)(a) of the Act as the application of funds need not be more than

M/S. VAIBHAV CONSTRUCTION,ANAND vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1,, ANAND

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1597/AHD/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Oct 2019AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Aseem L. Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma, CIT.DR &
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

Charitable Trust v. Union of India [20101 327ITR 73/188 Taxman 402 (Punj. & Ear.) - Commissioner however once again refused to grant registration observing that assessee was only engaged in leasing out building to third party, and no educational activities were provided by assessee - Whether in view of above said finding of Tribunal, Commissioner was not right in relooking at issue

M/S. VAIBHAV CONSTRUCTION,ANAND vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1,, ANAND

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2692/AHD/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Oct 2019AY 2006-07
For Appellant: Shri Aseem L. Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma, CIT.DR &
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80I

Charitable Trust v. Union of India [20101 327ITR 73/188 Taxman 402 (Punj. & Ear.) - Commissioner however once again refused to grant registration observing that assessee was only engaged in leasing out building to third party, and no educational activities were provided by assessee - Whether in view of above said finding of Tribunal, Commissioner was not right in relooking at issue