ACIT (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE 1 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. DR K R SHROFF FOUNDATION, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed\n\n29

charitable\npurpose' as it was working for the advancement of general public utility in\nthe field of education.\n\n17. On the issue of denial of exemption under Section 11 & 12 of the\nAct by invoking provisions of Section 13(1)(c) r.w.s.13(3) of the Act, the\nLd. Sr. Counsel submitted that tax on capital gain on transfer

DAWOODI BOHRA MUSAFIRKHANA TRUST,KHAMBHAT vs. THE ITO, WARD (EXEMPTION), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalिनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 Vs. Dawoodi Bohra Musafirkhana Income-Tax Officer, Trust, Ward (Exemption), 1, Dawoodi Bohra Musafirkhana, Vadodara Opp. Bus Stand, Khambhat, Gujarat-388620 Pan : Aaatd 2007 L अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" "" यथ" "" "" यथ" यथ"/ (Respondent) यथ" Assessee By : Shri Ankit Chokshi, Ar Revenue By : Shri Ashok Kumar Suthar, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" क" तारीख तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.02.2024 सुनवाई सुनवाई सुनवाई क" क" तारीख तारीख घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03.05.2024 घोषणा घोषणा घोषणा क" क" तारीख तारीख आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per Annapurna Gupta:

charitable purposes in terms of Section 11(1)(a) of the Act. Thus, while the corpus donation of Rs.1,08,37,253/- was claimed as exempt u/s 11(1)(d) of the Act, Rs.99,12,380/- of the corpus donation utilized for capital purposes was also claimed as exempt u/s 11(1)(a) of the Act. It is in this

SHRI BHAVNAGAR DASHASHRIMALI KANTHIBANDH (VAISHNAV) VANIK GNATI,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

253(5) of the Income- tax Act, 1961, is to be exercised in a liberal and justice-oriented manner so as to advance substantial justice rather than to defeat it on technical grounds. 2.5 The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji & Others [(1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC)] laid down the guiding principles ITA No.134

SHRI BHAVNAGAR DASHASHRIMALI KANTHIBANDH (VAISHNAV) VANIK GNATI,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

253(5) of the Income-\ntax Act, 1961, is to be exercised in a liberal and justice-oriented manner so\nas to advance substantial justice rather than to defeat it on technical\ngrounds.\n2.5 The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji\n& Others [(1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC)] laid down the guiding principles\ngoverning condonation

BRAHMAKSHATRIYA KANJI DAMJI HINDU SARVAJANIK DHARAMSHALA PALITANA,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

3 i.e. Nature of activities as "Religious cum Charitable and as per the Registration Certificate issued by the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Bhavnagar trust is registered on 05.12.1962. 8. For the purpose of ready reference provision of sec 13(1)(b) of the Act are reproduced as under: 13. (1) Nothing contained in or section 12 shall operate

BHAVNATH EDUCATION TRUST,BAVNAGAR vs. THE ITO(EXEMPTION) WARD, BHAVNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1559/Ahd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19) बनाम/ Bhavnath Education Trust Income Tax Officer Bhanagar Highway, Dist. (Exemption) Vs. Bhavnagar, Ranghola- Ward, Bhavnagar 364230 / Aayakar Bhawan, Income Sanghavi & Company, Tax Office, Bhavanagar Prasham, 4Th Floor, Kasturba Road, Nr. Bilkha Plaza, Rajkot - 360001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaatb2003J (Appellant) .. (Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri M K Patel, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Smt. Mamta Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06/01/2026 07/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement

charitable Trust duly registered u/s 12A of the Act. 4. That I beg to submit that in accordance with the provisions of Section. 253(3

SHRI NAMINATH JAIN DERASAR TRUST,MEHSANA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No. 201/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : Na

253(3) of the Act. The assessee has filed an application supported by an affidavit sworn by Shri Abhaykumar Manubhai Fadia, trustee of the trust, explaining the reasons for such delay. As per the affidavit and submissions the impugned order of the CIT(Exemption) dated 03.09.2024 was sent via email to the registered email address of the assessee trust. However

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

253(3) of the 1961 Act. The Revenue has claimed that in view of extension of period of limitation by Hon’ble Supreme Court owing to Pandemic Covid-19 in Suo Motu Writ Petition(C) No. 3 of 2020 , wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court extended the period of limitation for filing appeals, there

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

253(3) of the 1961 Act. The Revenue has claimed that in view of extension of period of limitation by Hon’ble Supreme Court owing to Pandemic Covid-19 in Suo Motu Writ Petition(C) No. 3 of 2020 , wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court extended the period of limitation for filing appeals, there

LAKULISH SANATAN SANSKARITI PRABODHAN ABHIYAN,VADODARA, GUJARAT vs. CIT EXEMPTION , AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in the interests of justice

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Charitable Trust, Ahmedabad ITAT) mandate remand rather than cancellation for procedural lapses. Lakulish Sanatan Sanskriti Prabodhan Abhiyan vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year –N.A. - 2– 4. Ground 4: The Appellant's failure to file documents was not wilful or deliberate. Even if time limit was missed, the Tribunal possesses discretion under Section 253(5) to condone the delay. A petition

ARUNA KISHOR FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

253(5) of the Act, 1961. We find that the delay is neither contumacious nor deliberate, but rather a consequence of an erroneous interpretation of the Circular and the legal procedure. Accordingly, in the interest of substantial justice and considering the charitable ITA No.293/Ahd/2025 and 3 Others 4 nature of the assessee's activities, the delay of 156 days

ARUNA KISHOR FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

253(5) of the Act, 1961. We find that the delay is neither contumacious nor deliberate, but rather a consequence of an erroneous interpretation of the Circular and the legal procedure. Accordingly, in the interest of substantial justice and considering the charitable ITA No.293/Ahd/2025 and 3 Others 4 nature of the assessee's activities, the delay of 156 days

ARUNA KISHOR FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

253(5) of the Act, 1961. We find that the delay is neither contumacious nor deliberate, but rather a consequence of an erroneous interpretation of the Circular and the legal procedure. Accordingly, in the interest of substantial justice and considering the charitable ITA No.293/Ahd/2025 and 3 Others 4 nature of the assessee's activities, the delay of 156 days

ARUNA KISHORE FOUNDATION,VADODARA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

253(5) of the Act, 1961. We find that the delay is neither contumacious nor deliberate, but rather a consequence of an erroneous interpretation of the Circular and the legal procedure. Accordingly, in the interest of substantial justice and considering the charitable ITA No.293/Ahd/2025 and 3 Others 4 nature of the assessee's activities, the delay of 156 days

SHRI BASANTILAL RATHI CHARITABLE TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) Asst.Year –N.A. - 2– 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee / applicant trust filed application for grant of registration under Section 12A of the Act in Form 10AB. Ld. CIT(E) issued notices to the assessee dated 11.06.2024 and 29.06.2024 asking for certain details / documents. The CIT(E) noted that the applicant

VADODARA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2 (EXEMP), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

253. In view of the foregoing discussion and analysis, the following conclusions are recorded regarding the interpretation of the changed definition of "charitable purpose" (w.e.f. 01.04.2009), as well as the later amendments, and other related provisions of the IT Act. I.T.A Nos. 342/Ahd/2023 & 5 Ors. A.Ys. 2016-17 to 2018-19 Page No 17 Vadodara Urban Development Authority vs. ACIT

JT.CIT(E), CIRCLE-2 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. VADODARA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

253. In view of the foregoing discussion and analysis, the following conclusions are recorded regarding the interpretation of the changed definition of "charitable purpose" (w.e.f. 01.04.2009), as well as the later amendments, and other related provisions of the IT Act. I.T.A Nos. 342/Ahd/2023 & 5 Ors. A.Ys. 2016-17 to 2018-19 Page No 17 Vadodara Urban Development Authority vs. ACIT

JT.CIT(EXEMPTION)CIRCL-2 AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. VADODARA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

253. In view of the foregoing discussion and analysis, the following conclusions are recorded regarding the interpretation of the changed definition of "charitable purpose" (w.e.f. 01.04.2009), as well as the later amendments, and other related provisions of the IT Act. I.T.A Nos. 342/Ahd/2023 & 5 Ors. A.Ys. 2016-17 to 2018-19 Page No 17 Vadodara Urban Development Authority vs. ACIT