BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 244Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai26Karnataka25Allahabad16Ahmedabad8Chandigarh8Chennai7Jaipur5Bangalore4Cuttack2Pune1Delhi1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 2(15)22Section 1113Section 142(1)10Section 12A8Section 143(2)7Exemption7Section 143(3)6Section 2506Section 244A6Set Off of Losses

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 806/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A
2
Carry Forward of Losses2
Disallowance2

Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2011-12 with the DDIT(E)- Circle – 17(2), Bangalore declaring total income as Nil which was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act on 25.07.2012 resulting into a refund

THE ACIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2344/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2011-12 with the DDIT(E)- Circle – 17(2), Bangalore declaring total income as Nil which was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act on 25.07.2012 resulting into a refund

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 265/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2011-12 with the DDIT(E)- Circle – 17(2), Bangalore declaring total income as Nil which was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act on 25.07.2012 resulting into a refund

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 805/AHD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

Trust is also registered under Section 35AC of the Act by and under the notification dated 23.10.2007. 4. On 22.09.2011 the assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2011-12 with the DDIT(E)- Circle – 17(2), Bangalore declaring total income as Nil which was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act on 25.07.2012 resulting into a refund

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. CHARUTAR AROGYA MANDAL,,

In the result, revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 731/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jan 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Ms. Aparna Agrawal, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.R
Section 10Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 154Section 234ASection 244A

section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to “The Act”) for the Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The revenue has challenged the order passed by the Learned CIT(A) in allowing deficit of Rs.6,49,06,986/- to be carried forward for future set off. 3. The brief facts leading to the case is this that

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. ANIMAL BREEDING RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, (INDIA), ANAND

In the result, this tax appeal is dismissed

ITA 773/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Dev, Sr. D.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 80G

charitable purposes. The main objectives of the trust are-to breed the cattle and endeavour to improve the quality of the cows and oxen in view of the need of good oxen as India is prominent agricultural country, to produce and sale the cow milk; to hold and cultivate agricultural lands; to keep grazing lands for cattle keeping and breeding

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. ANIMAL BREEDING RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, (INDIA), ANAND

In the result, this tax appeal is dismissed

ITA 2639/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Ms. Aparna Agrawal, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 44ASection 80G(5)

charitable purposes. The main objectives of the trust are-to ITA No.2639/Ahd/2017 & CO No.07/Ahd/2019 DCIT vs. Animal Breeding Research Organization Asst.Year – 2013-14 breed the cattle and endeavour to improve the quality of the cows and oxen in view of the need of good oxen as India is prominent agricultural country, to produce and sale the cow milk; to hold

SUNIL PIYUSH SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. NFAC, DELHI PRESENT JURIS. -THE ITO, WARD-5(3)(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1917/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Piyush Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Chand Meena, Sr. D.R
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 144BSection 147Section 148ASection 244ASection 250Section 270ASection 270A(9)Section 29A

section 244A, as the demand giving rise to such payments is unlawful. I.T.A No. 1917/Ahd/2025 Sunil Piyush Shah, A.Y. 2019-20 8. That the orders of the learned AO and learned CIT(A) are arbitrary, contrary to facts and law, violative of the principles of equity, fairness, and natural justice, and hence liable to be quashed in their entirety