BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 167B(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi18Mumbai13Ahmedabad5Pune4Hyderabad3Cuttack3Visakhapatnam2Bangalore2Lucknow2Panaji2Cochin1Jaipur1Chennai1Jodhpur1Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 12A9Section 115Section 167B4Section 143(1)4Exemption4Section 23Section 164(1)3Section 143(3)2Limitation/Time-bar2

SMT. PASHIBEN PRAJAPATI FAMILY TRUST (DISC),AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in the manner as indicated above

ITA 305/AHD/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Aug 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Ld. Cit(A) Has In-Turn Arisen From The Intimation Dated 07.12.2022 Issued By Cpc, Bengaluru, U/S.154(Cpc/2122/U5/ 314311772) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Rupesh R Shah, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 154Section 164(1)Section 250Section 80Section 80C

trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes, or which is of the nature referred to in sub- clause (iia) of clause (24) of section 2.] [or which is of the nature referred to in sub- section (4A) of section 11.] tax shall be charged on so much of the relevant income as is not exempt under section 11 [or section

Addition to Income2
Natural Justice2
Deduction2

TARAMANDAL CHARITABLE TRUST,VADODARA vs. ACIT, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 454/AHD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jan 2022AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Parimal Sinh B. Parmar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Shukla, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 167BSection 234ASection 250(6)

167B of the Act. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the disallowance of deduction of Rs. 51,420/- being amount applied to charitable purposes by the appellant u/s. 11 of the Act. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the disallowance

SHRI SORATHIYA DARJI KEDVANI MANDAL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/AHD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2021-22

For Appellant: Shri Pratik P. Darji, A.RFor Respondent: Shri N.J. Vyas, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 167BSection 2

Section 143(1) is fundamentally flawed. The taxes demanded exceed the declared income, which is contrary to the principle that taxes cannot exceed the total income. This erroneous computation has resulted in an unjustified financial burden on the appellant. 6) The unjustified demand raised by the Department adversely affects the appellant's charitable activities. The appellant has been engaged

SHRI BRTALISH DASH HUMMAD JAIN CHOKHLA PUNCH SANCHALIT KESHAVLAL MAGANLAL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,EXEMPTION-2,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 166/AHD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Nov 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)

charitable purposes since it has to be considered as providing the facility of Dharamshala with the object of providing general public utility. 18. It is humbly prayed that if the delay is not condoned, it will severely impact the functioning of the appellant. 19. The appellant begs your good honour to condone the delay in filing the appeal

SHRI BETALISH DASH HUMMAD JAIN CHOKHLA PUNCH SANCHALIT KESHAVLAL MAGANLAL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 165/AHD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Nov 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)

charitable purposes since it has to be considered as providing the facility of Dharamshala with the object of providing general public utility. 18. It is humbly prayed that if the delay is not condoned, it will severely impact the functioning of the appellant. 19. The appellant begs your good honour to condone the delay in filing the appeal