BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

53 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 164(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka427Delhi207Mumbai133Bangalore105Chennai73Ahmedabad53Chandigarh47Jaipur37Cochin31Lucknow30Pune27Calcutta16Visakhapatnam16Kolkata10Agra5Amritsar4Cuttack4Indore4Rajkot3Telangana3Surat3Nagpur3Panaji3Allahabad3Patna2Jodhpur2Hyderabad2Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan2SC1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1155Section 2(15)52Exemption52Section 80G(5)45Section 12A43Section 143(1)37Section 1025Charitable Trust19Deduction14

SMT. PASHIBEN PRAJAPATI FAMILY TRUST (DISC),AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in the manner as indicated above

ITA 305/AHD/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Aug 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Ld. Cit(A) Has In-Turn Arisen From The Intimation Dated 07.12.2022 Issued By Cpc, Bengaluru, U/S.154(Cpc/2122/U5/ 314311772) Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri Rupesh R Shah, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 154Section 164(1)Section 250Section 80Section 80C

164. (1) Subject to the provisions of Sub-sections (2) and (3), where any income in respect of which the persons mentioned in clauses (iii) and (iv) of sub- section (1) of section 160 are liable as representative assessees or any part thereof is not specifically receivable on behalf or for whose benefit of any one person or where

Showing 1–20 of 53 · Page 1 of 3

Section 80G11
Section 143(3)10
Limitation/Time-bar8

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 265/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

164(2) applies to the whole or a part of the relevant income of a charitable or religious trust which forfeits exemption by virtue of the provisions of the Income-tax Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settler, etc., contained in section 13(1

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 805/AHD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

164(2) applies to the whole or a part of the relevant income of a charitable or religious trust which forfeits exemption by virtue of the provisions of the Income-tax Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settler, etc., contained in section 13(1

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 806/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

164(2) applies to the whole or a part of the relevant income of a charitable or religious trust which forfeits exemption by virtue of the provisions of the Income-tax Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settler, etc., contained in section 13(1

THE ACIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 2344/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad03 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate
Section 11Section 129Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 244A

164(2) applies to the whole or a part of the relevant income of a charitable or religious trust which forfeits exemption by virtue of the provisions of the Income-tax Act in regard to investment pattern or use of the trust property for the benefit of the settler, etc., contained in section 13(1

PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 991/AHD/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

For Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 133ASection 80G(5)

164, lends a meaning that denial of entire exemption is not contemplated in Section 13. As there is no apparent violation of provisions of Section 13 as discussed herein above, benefit provided in Section 11 and 12 cannot be denied. 5.8 So far as the activities of the trust are genuine, and income of the trust are applied

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST, , AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 1019/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

For Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 133ASection 80G(5)

164, lends a meaning that denial of entire exemption is not contemplated in Section 13. As there is no apparent violation of provisions of Section 13 as discussed herein above, benefit provided in Section 11 and 12 cannot be denied. 5.8 So far as the activities of the trust are genuine, and income of the trust are applied

PARUL UNIVERSITY,VADODARA vs. THE DY.CIT,EXEMPTION CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 993/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

For Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 133ASection 80G(5)

164, lends a meaning that denial of entire exemption is not contemplated in Section 13. As there is no apparent violation of provisions of Section 13 as discussed herein above, benefit provided in Section 11 and 12 cannot be denied. 5.8 So far as the activities of the trust are genuine, and income of the trust are applied

PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 992/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

For Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 133ASection 80G(5)

164, lends a meaning that denial of entire exemption is not contemplated in Section 13. As there is no apparent violation of provisions of Section 13 as discussed herein above, benefit provided in Section 11 and 12 cannot be denied. 5.8 So far as the activities of the trust are genuine, and income of the trust are applied

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE1(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST, AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 1018/AHD/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

For Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 133ASection 80G(5)

164, lends a meaning that denial of entire exemption is not contemplated in Section 13. As there is no apparent violation of provisions of Section 13 as discussed herein above, benefit provided in Section 11 and 12 cannot be denied. 5.8 So far as the activities of the trust are genuine, and income of the trust are applied

THE DY. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. UTTHAN SEWA TRUST,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 21/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad)

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D.RFor Respondent: Shri Jignesh Kumar P. Parikh, A.R
Section 11(1)Section 142(1)

164 ITR 439 476 (Raj), Raguvanshi Charitable Trust & Others v. DIT (2011) 211 Taxation 250 (Del) etc.. Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Shri Plot Shwetambar Murtipujak Jain Mandal has held as follows :- "A bare perusal of section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, shows that the income derived from property held under trust wholly

KOSHAMBH CHARITABLE TRUST,VADODARA vs. CPC, BANGALORE PRESENT JURISDICTION THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, VADODARA

In the result, the above ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 444/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay R. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Veerbadram Vislavath, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 139Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

Charitable Trust vs. ITO(E) Asst.Year –2018-19 - 6– Tribunal held that requirement of filing Form 10/10B is merely directory in nature and failure to furnish Form 10/10B before due date prescribed under Section 139(1) of the Act cannot be so fatal so as to deny very claim of exemption under Section

GUJARAT ROHIT SAMAJ TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2161/AHD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2161/Ahd/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2015-16 Gujarat Rohit Samaj Trust, D.C.I.T, 33, New Chandranagar Society, Vs. Cpc, B/H Supath-Ii, Bangalore. Union Bank Old Wadaj, Ahmedabad-380013. Pan: Aaatg7340R

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divatia, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.D.R
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 143(1)Section 164

1) That Hon’ble CIT(A)/Ahmedabad has erred in passing the appeal order by attracting provision of section 164 of the IT Act which is covered in the case of your appellant and dismissed the apeal 2) That your appellant is a recognized registered charitable trust

BARODA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,,VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT, (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1435/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed)

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri O.P. Sharma, CIT/ D.R
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 2(15)Section 2(24)(xviii)Section 234BSection 271Section 28

164. In ground nos. 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9, which we will take up together, the assessee has raised the following grievances: 2. On the facts and circumstances of appellant’s case as well as in law, it is prayed that the provisions of section 13(8) r.w.s. 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 should

THE DY. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-2,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. KASTURBEN JAGJIVANBHAI BHALODIA CHARITABLE TRUST,, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1545/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D.R
Section 11

Section 11(1)(a) of the Act to indicate that the income from trust property should have been applied for charitable or religious trusts only in the year in which such income has arisen. The expenditure incurred in the earlier year can be met out of the income of the subsequent year and utilization of such income for meeting

GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY,,AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT

In the result, the above ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 935/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Ms. Amrin Pathan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 147Section 148Section 263

charitable trust registered under section 12A, had substantially satisfied condition for availing benefit of exemption as a trust, it could not be denied exemption merely on bar of limitation in furnishing audit report in Form no. 10B. In the case of Vardhman Stanakvasi Jain Shravak Trust vs. Income-tax Officer [2025] 172 taxmann.com 165 (Ahmedabad-Trib

JAIN SANGH PARABDI KHATU TRUSTEE,ANKLAV vs. THE DCIT, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 354/AHD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 May 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddharatha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 353-354/Ahd/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18 Jain Sangh Parabdi Khayu Trustee, D.C.I.T., 1, In Bazar, Anklav, Vs. Cpc, Dist. Anand-388510, Bangalore.

For Appellant: Shri B.T. Thakar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Agarwal, Sr.D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 160Section 164Section 164(1)

1) of the Act which provides to charge the tax at the rate of maximum marginal rate. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT-A the assessee is in appeal before us. 7. The learned AR also contended that rate of tax as provided under section 164 of the Act as applicable to an individual should

JAIN SANGH PARABDI KHATU TRUSTEE,ANKLAV vs. THE DCIT, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 353/AHD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddharatha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 353-354/Ahd/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2016-17 & 2017-18 Jain Sangh Parabdi Khayu Trustee, D.C.I.T., 1, In Bazar, Anklav, Vs. Cpc, Dist. Anand-388510, Bangalore.

For Appellant: Shri B.T. Thakar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Agarwal, Sr.D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 160Section 164Section 164(1)

1) of the Act which provides to charge the tax at the rate of maximum marginal rate. 6. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT-A the assessee is in appeal before us. 7. The learned AR also contended that rate of tax as provided under section 164 of the Act as applicable to an individual should

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1., AHMEDABAD vs. NIRMAN FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 470/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Shukla, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)

164 ITR 439 476 (Raj) etc. Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Shri Plot Shwetambar Murtipujak Jain Mandal has held as follows :- "A bare perusal of section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, shows that the income derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes to the extent to which such income

MEHTA SAKARCHAND KALIDAS TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT CPC , BANGLORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 505/AHD/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Sept 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Sushil Prajapati, ARFor Respondent: Shri N.J. Vyas, Sr. D.R
Section 13(1)Section 143(1)Section 164(2)Section 250

164(2) was not applicable to the appellant Trust and its total income did not exceed exemption limit of Rs.2,50.000/-, it was not liable to maximum marginal rate. It is, therefore, prayed that the tax liability at maximum marginal rate upheld by the CIT(A) may kindly be deleted.” 3. The assessee is a charitable Trust and is registered