SHRI KRIPALU SAMADHI MANDIR TRUST,KALOL vs. THE CIT (EXEMP), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms.Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2025-26 Kripalu Muni Mandal Trust The Ito, Ward At Malav, Taluka Kalol Vs. Exemption. Dist: Panchmahal. Vadodara. Pan : Aaatk 7859 F Asstt.Year : 2025-26 Shri Kripalu Samadhi Mandir Trust The Ito, Ward At, Post Malav Taluka Kalol Vs Exemption. Malav, Kalol. . Vadodara. Pan : Aapts 9485E (Applicant) (Responent) : Shri Nishit Shah, Ar Assessee By : Shri Rignesh Das, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 15/10/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/10/2025

3. Facts of the Cases: 3.1 Both the assessees, namely Kripalu Muni Mandal Trust and Shri Kripalu Samadhi Mandir Trust, are long-standing charitable institutions registered under section 12A

CLEAN TEETH CLEAN MOUTH CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

12A or under clause (iii) of the first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act, as the case may be. Hence, in cases where any trust, institution or fund has already made an application in Form No.10AB under the said provisions on or before the issuance of this Circular, and where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner

THE DCIT (EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-2, AHMEDABAD vs. SHREE KHODAL DHAM TRUST, KAGWAD, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedअपील सं./Ita No.904/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2014-2015 D.C.I.T.(Exemptions) Shree Khodal Dham Trust, Circle-2, Vs. Kagwad, Ahmedabad. Alka Society, 4Th Floor, Shri Sardar Patel Bhavan, Near Water Tank, Rajkot-360004. Pan: Aajts1017J

charitable in nature. 3. The facts in brief are that the assessee in the present case is a trust and registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1950 vide registration No. E/8846/Rajkot dated 18th March 2010 with the Assistant Charity Commissioner of Rajkot region. The assessee was also registered under the provisions of section 12A

BHOJALRAM LEUVA PATEL SEVA SAMAJ TRUST,DEVKI GALOL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

charitable and religious trust eligible for claiming exemption under Section 11, it becomes relevant to test it on the anvil of Section 13. 10. In view of the above judicial precedents, looking into the facts of the instant case, we are of the considered view that the provisions of Section 13 of the Act can be invoked only

BHOJALRAM LEUVA PATEL SEVA SAMAJ TRUST,DEVKI GALOL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

charitable and religious trust eligible for claiming exemption under Section 11, it becomes relevant to test it on the anvil of Section 13. 10. In view of the above judicial precedents, looking into the facts of the instant case, we are of the considered view that the provisions of Section 13 of the Act can be invoked only

SHRI SOUDHARMA BRIHAD TAPOGACHCHIYA TRISTUTIK JAIN SANGHA SAMARPANAM,AHMEDABAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is devoid of\nmerits and the same is hereby dismissed

3. Thus a conjoint reading of Sections 11, 12, 12A and 12AA of\nthe Act makes it clear that registration under sections 12A and\n12AA is a condition precedent for availing benefit under Sections\n11 and 12. Unless an institution is registered under the aforesaid\nprovisions, it cannot claim the benefit of Sections 11 and 12.\nSection

NANA AND RANDER SUNNI VOHRA MEDICAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (EXEMPTION ) AHMEDABAD, AHMRDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

3(ii) shall also apply in case of all pending applications under clause (iii) of the first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 or sub-clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A or under clause (iii) of the first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act, as the case

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

3. The brief facts leading to this case is this that the assessee trust came into existence in the year 1996 registered under section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act by and under the order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-II, Bangalore, being Memo No. Trust/718/10A/Vol.A-III, V- ITA Nos.265, 805, 806 & 2344/Ahd/2018 DCIT vs. VyaktiVikas Kendra

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

3. The brief facts leading to this case is this that the assessee trust came into existence in the year 1996 registered under section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act by and under the order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-II, Bangalore, being Memo No. Trust/718/10A/Vol.A-III, V- ITA Nos.265, 805, 806 & 2344/Ahd/2018 DCIT vs. VyaktiVikas Kendra

THE ACIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

3. The brief facts leading to this case is this that the assessee trust came into existence in the year 1996 registered under section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act by and under the order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-II, Bangalore, being Memo No. Trust/718/10A/Vol.A-III, V- ITA Nos.265, 805, 806 & 2344/Ahd/2018 DCIT vs. VyaktiVikas Kendra

DCIT (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1, BANGLORE vs. VYAKTI VIKAS KENDRA INDIA,, AHMEDABAD

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar& Ms. Madhumita Roy

3. The brief facts leading to this case is this that the assessee trust came into existence in the year 1996 registered under section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act by and under the order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-II, Bangalore, being Memo No. Trust/718/10A/Vol.A-III, V- ITA Nos.265, 805, 806 & 2344/Ahd/2018 DCIT vs. VyaktiVikas Kendra

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE1(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST, AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

3) of the Act. The provisions of Section 13(1)(d) further speak about utilisation of trust income and investments thereof in particular manners. There is prohibition of utilisation of trust funds to be invested or deposited otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11 and on perusal

PARUL UNIVERSITY,VADODARA vs. THE DY.CIT,EXEMPTION CIRCLE-1, AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

3) of the Act. The provisions of Section 13(1)(d) further speak about utilisation of trust income and investments thereof in particular manners. There is prohibition of utilisation of trust funds to be invested or deposited otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11 and on perusal

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD vs. PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST, , AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

3) of the Act. The provisions of Section 13(1)(d) further speak about utilisation of trust income and investments thereof in particular manners. There is prohibition of utilisation of trust funds to be invested or deposited otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11 and on perusal

PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

3) of the Act. The provisions of Section 13(1)(d) further speak about utilisation of trust income and investments thereof in particular manners. There is prohibition of utilisation of trust funds to be invested or deposited otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11 and on perusal

PARUL AROGYA SEVA MANDAL TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Accountnat Member

3) of the Act. The provisions of Section 13(1)(d) further speak about utilisation of trust income and investments thereof in particular manners. There is prohibition of utilisation of trust funds to be invested or deposited otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11 and on perusal

ANNAPURNA CHARITABLE TRUST,BANASKANTHA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Us Raising The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) 5. The above judgments will hold good to a Trust created before 01- 04-2021. Since the assessee has to first cross the hurdle of being eligible to exemption under section 11 by obtaining a certificate of registration under section 12A of the Act. Having crossed this hurdle then after the provisions of Section

CHAMUNDA FOUNDATION,AHMEDABAD vs. THE CIT,, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, the CO No.83/Ahd/2015 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roysl.

12A of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'). For this reason, in the previous year to the year with which we are concerned and in which year the depreciation was claimed, the entire expenditure incurred for acquisition of capital assets was treated as application of income for charitable purposes under Section